#How this page was made
The test was written down before counting: if seals have at least 60% of the profiles taken in winter (June–September) under the ice south of 60°S, the idea of the page stands; otherwise it is dropped. In the form written then, with any profile in the archive whatever variable it measured, the result was 73.8% (75,864 of 102,790).
The page then uses only temperature profiles that have, on at least two levels of the drawn grid, values derived (including by interpolation) from measurements accepted by the archive’s quality control (at profile, depth and value level) (every 50 metres to 1,000, then every 250 to 2,000): 81,328, with 75.8% from seals. Each one is a thread on the map. Another 4,849 profiles with fewer than two drawn levels, including all those from moorings, are not counted. Classes: seals = profiles from animal-borne sensors (in the MEOP programme, where most come from, seals); ships = CTD, bottles, XBT and MBT; floats = profiling floats.
Checks, on the count written beforehand: without 115 possible duplicate records (same date, hour and position), seals have 73.8%. Profiles falling in coast, land or missing cells of the ice map took the value of the nearest sea cell whose centre on the projected grid is within 75 kilometres of the original cell’s centre (5,686 profiles, 29 left without a value): 75.0%. MEOP gives 72,711 seal profiles with the same filter, against 75,864 in the archive; the two lists were not matched profile by profile. In cells with a monthly concentration below 15%, seals have 56.5%.
Seals usually dive a few hundred metres: 17,519 seal profiles have accepted temperatures at 500 metres or deeper, against 17,827 from floats. The sea floor is from ETOPO 2022; the ice on the map is each year’s September. The pre-registration, the verdict and the count by year are published below.