FRANCE · INTELLIGENCE SERVICES · ART. L.861-4

The ministerreads it first.

France now requires current agents of its six specialised intelligence services, and former agents for ten years after leaving, to transmit covered works to the minister responsible for their service before publication or distribution, or before sharing them with third parties for either purpose. Review can reach unclassified operational procedures and technical capabilities when disclosure could impair a service's effectiveness or endanger its personnel. S01S05

The law was published on 18 August 2026. The article has been in force since 19 August. No implementing decree was located in the official sources checked through 23 August. S01S02S07

Follow the routing slip
ROUTING SLIP / L.861-4FR / 2026

WORK ABOUT A SERVICE'S ACTIVITIES

CURRENT AGENT OR FORMER AGENT / LEFT < 10 YEARS AGO

ORDER IS MANDATORY
6specialised services
10 yearsafter leaving service
≤ 4 monthscap on the ministerial silence period

The decree will set the exact period. A modification demand interrupts the clock, so total elapsed time may exceed four months.

01 / THE LEGAL ROUTE

How a work reaches publication

The statute calls the mechanism a prior declaration. The author sends the work, or the information it is expected to contain, before publication or distribution and before communication to a third party for either purpose. S01S04

The six services

  • DGSEDirection générale de la sécurité extérieure
  • DRSDDirection du renseignement et de la sécurité de la défense
  • DRMDirection du renseignement militaire
  • DGSIDirection générale de la sécurité intérieure
  • DNREDDirection nationale du renseignement et des enquêtes douanières
  • TRACFINTraitement du renseignement et action contre les circuits financiers clandestins

  1. AUTHOR

    Current agent or recent former agent

    The duty covers every agent of the listed services. It continues for ten years after service ends, with no seniority or role exemption in the text. S01S03S05

  2. WORK

    An authored intellectual work about the services

    The covered person must be the author, and the work must concern the activities of one of the six services. The French œuvre de l'esprit category is broad. The Senate report says it can include books, essays, documentaries, podcasts and other works recognised by intellectual-property law. S01S04

  3. TRANSMISSION

    The ministry receives the material before the publisher

    The author declares the project and transmits the work or the information intended for inclusion in it. The Senate report expressly says this stage comes before communication to a publisher. S01S04

    The advance-notice period will be set by decree.

  4. REVIEW

    The minister checks three defined grounds

    Review covers national-defence secrets, protected identities and affiliations, and operational procedures or technical capabilities whose disclosure could impair effectiveness or compromise personnel safety. S01S03

  5. RESPONSE

    A modification demand comes before opposition

    The minister identifies the material to change. If the author refuses, the minister may oppose publication, distribution, or communication to third parties for either purpose. S01

    Silence after the decree-set period means no opposition.

  6. COURT

    The author can challenge both acts

    A modification demand and an opposition decision can be challenged in court, including through urgent proceedings. Before opposition, the author can make written observations and oral observations on request. S01S03

02 / THE DECISIVE GROUND

What can trigger a modification demand?

The same work reaches the minister's desk. Choose what it would disclose. The result shows the power described in Article L.861-4 without evaluating a real case.

Choose the work's content

REVIEW RESULT

The minister may require changes if disclosure could impair the service's operational effectiveness or endanger its agents.

This ground can apply even when the information has never been formally classified.

WHAT FOLLOWS

If the author refuses, the minister may oppose publication. The author can seek court review, including urgent proceedings.

BASIS S01S03S04

Explanatory tool. It does not decide whether a person or work is covered, and it is not legal advice.

03 / BEFORE PUBLICATION

A single statutory route across all six services

Existing secrecy duties and criminal offences continue to apply. The DGSE already had a service-specific rule, and informal review existed elsewhere. Article L.861-4 creates a uniform statutory process for all six services and covers former agents for ten years after they leave. S04

EXISTING CRIMINAL PROTECTIONSARTICLE L.861-4
Timing After disclosure, through investigation and prosecution. Before publication or distribution and before communication to a third party for either purpose.
Question Did the author reveal a classified secret, protected identity, or other criminally protected information? Would the work reveal a procedure or technical capability in a way that impairs effectiveness or endangers personnel?
Response If prosecutors prove the offence, a court may impose the statutory penalties. The minister may require changes, followed by possible opposition if the author refuses.

↳The operational ground has its own harm threshold and can reach information that was never formally classified. S04

04 / THE LIMITS ON REVIEW

The safeguards that carried constitutional weight

The deputies who referred the law to the Constitutional Council argued that it restricted expression and gave ministers too much discretion. The Council rejected those claims on 6 August 2026. S03

01 / PEOPLE

Current personnel and former personnel within the ten-year period.

02 / SUBJECT

Only authored works concerning the activities of one of the six services.

03 / GROUNDS

Ministerial action must fit the secrecy, identity, or operational-harm grounds in the statute.

04 / PROCEDURE

Written observations, oral observations on request, and court access for modification demands and opposition.

The Council found that these limits struck a constitutionally acceptable balance with freedom of expression. The minister reviews the work first, and courts can review both a modification demand and an opposition. S03

05 / RULE STATUS

The article is in force. Its procedural clock is incomplete.

  1. The Constitutional Council issues its decision.
  2. The President promulgates the law.
  3. The law is published in the Journal officiel.
  4. Article L.861-4 enters into force.
  5. No implementing decree was located in the official sources checked.

An implementing decree adopted after consultation with the Conseil d'État must set the author's advance-notice period, the period after which ministerial silence counts as no opposition, and the remaining procedural details. The statute caps only the silence period at four months. A modification demand interrupts it; a new period starts when the minister receives the author's reply. S01S07

Status checked on 23 August 2026

06 / THE PUBLIC RECORD

The official record behind this page

The page separates operative law, parliamentary explanation, and the documented decree search. Each link opens the official document used.

  1. S01

    Légifrance · in force from 19 August 2026

    Internal Security Code, Article L.861-4

    Covered people and works, prior transmission, intervention grounds, procedure, timing and the penalty.

    Open source

  2. S02

    Légifrance · published on 18 August 2026

    Law no. 2026-791, Article 31

    The enactment that created Article L.861-4 and its Journal officiel publication date.

    Open source

  3. S03

    Conseil constitutionnel · 6 August 2026, paragraphs 17-38

    Decision no. 2026-907 DC

    Freedom of expression, the regime's limits, adversarial procedure, court review and the penalty's proportionality.

    Open source

  4. S04

    Sénat · 20 May 2026

    Law Committee report on the regime

    Earlier service practices, the case for preventive review, transmission before the publisher, and the distinction between classification and operational sensitivity.

    Open source

  5. S05

    Légifrance · current list

    Internal Security Code, Article R.811-1

    The list of the six specialised intelligence services.

    Open source

  6. S06

    Conseil d'État · 26 March 2026

    Opinion on the bill, paragraphs 36-40

    Proportionality and the need to consider the passage of time when exercising the opposition power.

    Open source

  7. S07

    Légifrance · search run on 23 August 2026

    Regulatory Book VIII and the 23 August JORF

    The documented search status for the implementing decree in official sources through the stated date.

    Open source Also open the 23 August JORF

Last checked on 23 August 2026. Review after the implementing decree, an amendment to Article L.861-4, or a relevant court decision.

Back to top