246 × 5
I queried every court code in the official schema for every weekday from 8 to 12 June 2026: 1,230 complete responses.
Romania · 8–12 June 2026
A displayed time looks like an individual appointment. In Romania's court lists, it is often a shared label for a batch.
65% of 131,180 analysed positions share their time with at least nine others in the same hearing list.
See the distribution01 / THE NATIONAL PATTERN
I grouped identical times only within the same source session. Each unit is one <SedintaDosar> position, not one unique lawsuit across the week.
02 / FIND YOUR COURT
Choose any court and one of the five days. Each rectangle is one published time within a session; the number shows how many positions received it.
Rectangle size uses readable bands; printed counts are exact. Session order and separation follow the official response.
03 / FIVE DAYS
The share in batches of at least ten rises slightly from Monday to Friday. The complete range is narrow: five percentage points.
04 / METHOD
The query, unit and exclusions were fixed before the national result was calculated.
I queried every court code in the official schema for every weekday from 8 to 12 June 2026: 1,230 complete responses.
The unit is one <SedintaDosar> appearance in a list. A case may appear again on another day; the study does not deduplicate lawsuits across the week.
Times are grouped only inside their containing <Sedinta> element. Similar panels or labels in separate source nodes remain separate.
The 152 positions carrying this time are reported separately because the consulted source does not document its meaning. Three malformed values were excluded; no times were missing.
The API contains no actual call time, waiting time, hearing duration, attendance or real calling order. A shared time describes the published schedule.
The court regulation allows cases to be called in a different order while respecting the allocated interval. This study shows the shape of one completed week's lists; it does not measure delays, workload or the quality of justice.
Procedural context: Internal court regulation, Article 121(5).
05 / DATA TRAIL
Independent analysis by Marius Comper. This project is not affiliated with Romania's courts or Ministry of Justice. Public case data was reduced to aggregate counts before publication.