mariuscomper.ukRO
Histogram of the gap between taps for 3,576 people: most lie between 0.4 and 1.2 seconds, with the middle at 0.73 s.

A 15-second test

Inner tempo: how fast 3,576 people tap a finger when nothing sets the pace

Asked to tap at a comfortable pace, each person settles on a pace of their own. A 2021 study at the University of Hamburg timed 3,576 people doing just that and published the gaps between their taps. Take the study’s 15-second test and your dot joins theirs.

Tap the circle for 15 seconds at the pace that feels most comfortable and natural right now. Keep the gaps between taps as even as you can.

On a keyboard, press Space.

Who are the 3,576 dots?

Each dot is one person, flashing once per tap at the pace they chose. In 2018 and 2019 a web page of the University of Hamburg asked visitors to tap for 15 seconds on a phone, tablet, keyboard or mouse, at a pace that felt “most comfortable and natural to you right now”.

Visitors were told the test measured how evenly they could tap. What the researchers wanted was the pace each of them picked, which psychologists call spontaneous motor tempo.

How fast do people tap when nothing sets the pace?

Here the same people stand in order of the gap they left between taps: short gaps on the left, long ones on the right. The quickest left 0.12 s, about 8 taps a second. The slowest left 2.15 s.

The middle person left 0.73 s, which is 82 taps a minute.

Your dot appears here once you have tapped. Go to the test

Is there one natural human tempo?

Since the 1970s the reference value has been about 600 milliseconds between taps, or 100 a minute. It goes back to the work of the psychologist Paul Fraisse, who also noted that people differ.

In this sample, 543 of the 3,576 people (15%) tapped with gaps between 500 and 600 ms. Two in three (66%) were slower than 600. The largest of the paper’s six groups, 1,184 people, is centred on 525 ms.

A 2023 review of 107 studies, 13 of which give values for healthy adults, came to the same view: the reference value “is far from being a common value of 600 ms” in healthy adults, and what the studies show is a range.

Your dot appears here once you have tapped. Go to the test

Why does the line have several humps?

The line does not rise to one peak. The authors’ statistical model groups the sample into six, and the group averages fall near multiples of a quarter of a second: 265, 525, 754, 997, 1,314 and 1,757 ms.

They write that this “might be indicative” of an internal rhythm of about four beats a second, with people tapping on every second, third or fourth beat, and so on. The paper offers it as a possibility, not as a finding.

The authors add a caution about both ends. Some of the fastest people, at the far left, may have used two fingers or ignored the instructions; some of the slowest may have counted beats in their head and tapped only every other one.

Your dot appears here once you have tapped. Go to the test

How even is a steady tap?

Nobody taps like a metronome. Height now shows how much each person’s gaps varied around their own average: almost nothing at the bottom, 10% at the top. Half of the sample stayed under 5.4%; for a gap of 0.7 s that is less than 0.04 s.

The flat upper edge is the test’s own rule. Anyone whose gaps varied by more than 10% was asked to tap again, as many times as it took; people needed 1.6 tries on average.

Among people who passed the 10% rule, pace and evenness have little to do with each other: fast and slow tappers are spread over the same heights.

Your dot appears here once you have tapped. Go to the test

Do calm people tap more slowly?

After tapping, everyone answered one question: “How do you feel right now?”, from very calm to very excited. Each column is one answer, with slower tapping higher up; the bar marks the middle person.

And you, right now?

Your dot appears here once you have tapped. Go to the test

The middle steps down from column to column: 759 ms among the very calm, then 741, 716, 675, and 647 among the 22 people who said very excited. The columns overlap almost completely, so the answer says little about any one person. The paper found no difference in mood between its six groups, and a small one inside them: people who felt more excited tapped a little faster.

Does the inner tempo slow with age?

Laboratory studies say it does at the two ends of life. Children of five to eight tap about once every 400 ms. For old people, one study gives 700–800 ms and others, at ages 66 to 94, give 1,050–1,125 ms.

Your age?

Your dot appears here once you have tapped. Go to the test

This sample stops at 49, and inside it the trend is faint. The middle person taps every 628 ms under 18, 680 at 18–24, 768 at 25–29 and 795 at 30–39, then 706 among the 303 people aged 40–49. Knowing someone’s age tells very little about their pace, though the authors read their own result as confirming that tapping slows with age.

What do another person’s 15 seconds sound like?

Choose any dot to hear the taps that person made, with the gaps from the published file, in their order; the page keeps the first 30 of each person.

Your own pace is not fixed either. The 2023 review names four studies that found an effect of the time of day; in two of them tapping was slower in the morning than in the evening. Tap again tomorrow morning: this device keeps your last result, so you will see both.

The whole sample in nine numbers

Each row gives the gap that a given share of the 3,576 people stayed under.

Share who tapped fasterGap between tapsTaps a minute
10%429 ms140
20%511 ms118
30%575 ms104
40%649 ms93
50%729 ms82
60%823 ms73
70%920 ms65
80%1,019 ms59
90%1,190 ms50

Inner tempo: short answers

What is spontaneous motor tempo?

The pace a person falls into when asked to tap, clap or walk at a comfortable rate with nothing to follow. Researchers usually measure it as the average gap between finger taps.

How many taps a minute is normal?

There is no single normal value. In the Hamburg sample the middle person tapped 82 times a minute (one tap every 0.73 s), and the middle half of the sample ran from 62 to 110 a minute. Only 15% tapped between 100 and 120 a minute (gaps of 500–600 ms).

Does the test work on a phone?

The study itself ran on phones, tablets and computers, and so does the test here. A screen or a keyboard adds a small error to the time of each tap, which matters little for an average taken over 15 seconds.

Where do my taps go?

Nowhere. The result is worked out on your device, and the last one stays saved there so that you can compare later. The clear button removes it.

How the numbers were made

The data come from David Hammerschmidt, Klaus Frieler and Clemens Wöllner, “Spontaneous Motor Tempo: Investigating Psychological, Chronobiological, and Demographic Factors in a Large-Scale Online Tapping Experiment”, Frontiers in Psychology, 2021. The authors published the gaps between each participant’s taps on Zenodo under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

The paper’s own exclusions were applied to that file: first participation only, an average gap of at least 100 ms, ages no more than 1.5 interquartile ranges outside the quartiles, and one person who claimed to be from Antarctica. That leaves the paper’s 3,576 people. The paper’s mean (780 ms), median (729 ms), range, correlation with age and the sizes of its six groups are reproduced from the file.

Who took part limits what the dots can say. 81% were from China, ages run from 7 to 49 with an average of 27.6, nobody watched how people tapped, and each of them tapped for only 15 seconds.

The file also records an hour for each test, and the paper reports slower tapping earlier in the day. The paper describes the hours as local time and puts the early peak down to many visitors arriving in a short time. Those hours are not used here: for the participants from China they peak between 4 and 6 in the morning, which suggests the clock may not have been local time for everyone.

The test on this page follows the study’s task and wording, with differences. The study’s visitors filled in a short form first and were not told that their pace was being measured. Above 10% variation they had to tap again, while this page shows the result anyway. Afterwards they saw how evenly they had tapped, compared with earlier visitors, and not their pace.

Sources

Data: Hammerschmidt, D., Frieler, K., & Wöllner, C. (2021), Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4897921, CC BY 4.0. The filtering, grouping and drawings on this page are not the authors’.