Bundibugyo ebolavirus · DR Congo and Uganda

Zaire Bundibugyo detection threshold

The test said no

Samples from Ituri went into the cartridge machine the world uses to find Ebola, and it returned negative. The machine was working correctly. It had been built to look for Zaire ebolavirus, which is the one species the licensed vaccine covers and the only one the two approved drugs are approved for. The virus in those samples was Bundibugyo.

  • 6known species of ebolavirus
  • 4cause disease in people
  • 1has a licensed vaccine

The DR Congo outbreak · 5,375 confirmed cases and 2,557 confirmed deaths · DRC INSP/government data through 20 August 2026

Bunia, May 2026

The machine was right

When people in Ituri started dying with high fever and bleeding, their samples went to the Provincial Public Health Laboratory in Bunia and into a . The machine said negative.

Days later the same samples came back positive on a that looks for every filovirus at once, run in a reference laboratory. On 22 May the World Health Organization wrote the sentence flat: the GeneXpert platform cannot detect Bundibugyo virus.

The cartridge was not broken. It was looking for sequences from Zaire ebolavirus, because Zaire ebolavirus is what it was designed for, and the samples from Bunia did not contain Zaire ebolavirus. Confirmation and isolation were delayed. The outbreak was found so late that it began with more cases than any Ebola outbreak on record.

The GeneXpert platform cannot detect Bundibugyo virus.World Health Organization, Disease Outbreak News, 22 May 2026
Three defences

Three doors

Behind these doors sit the three defences the world has against Ebola: a test, a vaccine, a drug. Choose which kind of Ebola arrives.

The testthe door stays shut
The vaccinethe door stays shut
The drugthe door stays shut
What works against each species that makes people ill
SpeciesRoutine field testLicensed vaccineApproved drug
Zaireyesyesyes
Sudannonono
Bundibugyononono
Taï Forestnonono

The flat line is the negative result, the same trace as in the plot at the top.

Four kinds of Ebola make people ill. One of them has all three doors open.

The routine field test is the GeneXpert Ebola cartridge, built for Zaire. For Bundibugyo, the regulatory door stays shut: Ervebo is not licensed and clinical protection has not been demonstrated. On 7 August 2026, WHO recommended taking it directly into a Phase III study in the current outbreak after new non-human-primate, ferret and pseudovirus-neutralisation evidence suggested possible cross-protection. The approved drugs are Inmazeb and Ebanga, both for Zaire only.

The economics of proof

A drug is only proved during an outbreak

Ervebo, Inmazeb and Ebanga were approved on the strength of studies run on people during outbreaks. That is how anyone finds out whether an Ebola vaccine or treatment works: you give it to people who have the disease or are about to be exposed to it, and you compare what happens to them. There is no other place and no other moment to do it.

Ervebo exists because the West African epidemic between 2013 and 2016 left more than 11,000 dead and, with them, enough sick people for a trial. Inmazeb and Ebanga came out of the 2018 to 2020 outbreak in DR Congo.

Both previous Bundibugyo outbreaks were too small for that. The first, in Uganda in 2007 and 2008, had 131 reported cases and 42 deaths. The second, in DR Congo in 2012, had 62 cases and 34 deaths. There were never enough sick people to prove anything, and never enough well people for a manufacturer to sell to.

There is a European document that says this out loud. When the European Medicines Agency recommended the two-dose Ebola vaccine Zabdeno and Mvabea in May 2020, it wrote that the authorisation was granted under exceptional circumstances „because the applicant was able to demonstrate that it is not possible to conduct a randomised controlled study that might generate comprehensive clinical data on the efficacy of the new Ebola vaccine even after authorisation”. The regulator wrote down the trap in 2020 and licensed the product anyway.

Nobody ever bought it. On 1 May 2026 the European Commission withdrew the authorisation at the manufacturer’s request, for commercial reasons. Fourteen days later, DR Congo declared an Ebola outbreak.

Ebola countermeasures on the European and United States registers, 25 July 2026
ProductSpecies coveredStatus
ErveboZaireauthorised in the EU since November 2019
Zabdeno and MvabeaZaireEU authorisation withdrawn on 1 May 2026
InmazebZaireapproved in the United States, not in the EU
EbangaZaireapproved in the United States, not in the EU

The world’s filovirus kit is not a map of the dangerous viruses. It is a register of the outbreaks that grew large enough to be used as proof.

The three Bundibugyo outbreaks

The window

A treatment can only be proved while there are patients who can enter a trial.Every dot is one reported case.The first two outbreaks ended at 131 and 62 cases.There is no universal threshold: the number needed depends on the treatment, mortality and trial design.

2 July 2026PARTNERS opened in Bunia on 2 July 2026. The epidemiological situation reported for 1–2 July contained 1,481 confirmed cases in DR Congo, Uganda and France.

2 July 2026 PARTNERS begins enrolment 2007 and 2008 Uganda 2012 DR Congo 2026 DR Congo

131 reported cases. 42 deaths.

62 reported cases. 34 deaths.

5,375 confirmed cases and 2,557 confirmed deaths in the DRC. DRC INSP/government data run through 20 August.

2 July: PARTNERS begins enrolling patients.

The third outbreak created the first window in which a trial could begin.

The 2007 and 2012 figures are reported cases from the US CDC. For the current situation the DRC’s INSP and government report 5,375 confirmed cases and 2,557 confirmed deaths, with data through 20 August. The daily series may be revised retrospectively.

Uganda, 2022

Success destroyed the evidence

4years between the drug and the question still unanswered

In 2022 Uganda had an outbreak of Sudan ebolavirus. There was no approved treatment for Sudan either, so some patients were given MBP134, a pair of antibodies designed to cover several ebolavirus species at once. It was given , outside any trial, because there was nothing else to give.

Uganda stopped the outbreak faster than anyone expected. The outbreak ended before anyone could find out whether the drug had worked.

In July 2026 MBP134 entered the first trial that tests it in patients, in Bunia. Same drug. Same question. Four years in between, and it took another outbreak.

23 August 2026

What is being built now

Day 98of 100Day 0 · 17 May 2026Day 100 · 25 August 2026

A clock started when WHO declared the international emergency on 17 May. The target is called the 100 Days Mission, and it asks for tests, treatments and vaccines against a new pathogen to exist within a hundred days of that declaration. Day 100 falls on 25 August 2026; this snapshot is Day 98.

What exists for each species that makes people ill, at Day 98
SpeciesRapid test in the fieldLicensed vaccineApproved treatment
ZaireGeneXpert cartridgeErveboInmazeb, Ebanga
Sudannonenonenone
BundibugyoRADI kit, under validationnonenone
Taï Forestnonenonenone

The flat line is the negative result, the same trace as in the plot at the top. Here it means nothing exists.

  • On 2 July the first patient was enrolled in Bunia into PARTNERS, the trial testing MBP134 and remdesivir, separately and together.
  • On 14 July EBO-PEP began, giving obeldesivir, a drug taken by mouth, to people who have been exposed to the virus.
  • On 1 June, CEPI put money behind three candidate vaccines: up to 3.2 million dollars for IAVI, 8.6 million for Oxford with the Serum Institute of India, 50 million for Moderna.
  • On 13 July the University of Oxford announced the world’s first human trial of a Bundibugyo vaccine. Fifty healthy volunteers between 18 and 55, in Oxford. The announcement counts 57 days since the emergency was declared.
  • On 7 August WHO’s technical group recommended taking Ervebo directly into a Phase III study in the current outbreak to test possible cross-protection. Ervebo is not yet licensed for Bundibugyo.
  • 22 May–22 August · IHR Temporary Recommendations. The set issued by WHO on 22 May reached the automatic three-month limit under the International Health Regulations. The Emergency Committee met again on 18 August; when checked on 23 August, WHO’s committee page did not include revised or extended recommendations. The international emergency has a separate legal status and remains in force.
  • 21 August · the first doses reach DR Congo. More than 16,000 Ervebo doses arrived in Kinshasa. The DRC Ministry of Health and ACP give 16,520; AP and AFP reported 16,250. ACP describes this shipment as part of 50,120 doses expected between 21 and 24 August. WHO allocated 70,000 doses in total: 20,000 for the Phase III trial and 50,000 for frontline and health workers.
  • 22 August · available stock is smaller than the allocation. INSP’s director says the DRC currently has 20,750 doses available: 20,000 for the Phase III trial and 750 for frontline workers. The first announced strategy is a vaccination belt around Ituri to limit spread towards Tshopo, Haut-Uele and Bas-Uele. The sources reviewed do not yet confirm administration or the start of the trial. Ervebo remains unlicensed for Bundibugyo, and its clinical effectiveness against this species has not been demonstrated.

On that same 13 July, at Rwampara general hospital inside the epicentre, epidemiologists, case investigators, drivers and gravediggers went on strike because they had not been paid since the outbreak began. On Wednesday staff at Bunia general hospital struck too and blocked the entrance. Confirmed cases were passing 2,000 that week, with 754 dead.

The Oxford trial runs on healthy volunteers in a country with no Ebola. It shows whether that candidate is safe and whether it raises an immune response. Whether it protects anyone can only be learned where the disease is, which means Ituri, during the outbreak. Ervebo is at a different stage: WHO recommends taking it directly into a study in this outbreak, but it is not licensed or proven for Bundibugyo. If the outbreak is stopped before the Oxford study can answer the protection question, that candidate remains unlicensed. Oxford delivered in 57 days. The structure it delivered into is the part that does not hold.

If too few people have your disease, nobody can prove a treatment works, so nobody makes one. Ebola is the most violent version of the logic that decides whether a drug exists for a rare disease on a children’s ward in Bucharest or in Bristol.

Audit

Sources

What this is and what it is not

Evidence was searched to 23 August 2026. This covers the regulatory position in the European Union and the United States. There was no clinical review.

What is written here is public information, not medical advice. Anyone who develops a fever after travelling in an area with Ebola should call ahead and say where they have been before walking into a waiting room.

What kinds of claim are here

  • documented facthas a primary source, listed below
  • a number that movescarries its date beside it
  • editorial inferencejoins documented facts and is written as such

The outbreak

The detection gap

Vaccines and treatments

History and virology

Current as of 23 August 2026. Outbreak figures are tied to the date written beside them and may be revised.