Bundibugyo ebolavirus · DR Congo and Uganda

Zaire Bundibugyo detection threshold

The test said no

Samples from Ituri went into the cartridge machine the world uses to find Ebola, and it returned negative. The machine was working correctly. It had been built to look for Zaire ebolavirus, which is the one species the licensed vaccine covers and the only one the two approved drugs are approved for. The virus in those samples was Bundibugyo.

  • 6known species of ebolavirus
  • 4cause disease in people
  • 1has a licensed vaccine

The DR Congo outbreak · 8,067 cases, 3,901 deaths and 2,070 recoveries across seven provinces · DRC tally of 26 September published by NICD. The situation may change; earlier figures remain below as dated historical references.

Bunia, May 2026

The machine was right

When people in Ituri started dying with high fever and bleeding, their samples went to the Provincial Public Health Laboratory in Bunia and into a . The machine said negative.

Days later the same samples came back positive on a that looks for every filovirus at once, run in a reference laboratory. On 22 May the World Health Organization wrote the sentence flat: the GeneXpert platform cannot detect Bundibugyo virus.

The cartridge was not broken. It was looking for sequences from Zaire ebolavirus, because Zaire ebolavirus is what it was designed for, and the samples from Bunia did not contain Zaire ebolavirus. Confirmation and isolation were delayed. The outbreak was found so late that it began with more cases than any Ebola outbreak on record.

The GeneXpert platform cannot detect Bundibugyo virus.World Health Organization, Disease Outbreak News, 22 May 2026
Three defences

Three doors

Behind these doors sit the three defences the world has against Ebola: a test, a vaccine, a drug. Choose which kind of Ebola arrives.

The testthe door stays shut
The vaccinethe door stays shut
The drugthe door stays shut
What works against each species that makes people ill
SpeciesRoutine field testLicensed vaccineApproved drug
Zaireyesyesyes
Sudannonono
Bundibugyononono
Taï Forestnonono

The flat line is the negative result, the same trace as in the plot at the top.

Four kinds of Ebola make people ill. One of them has all three doors open.

The routine field test is the GeneXpert Ebola cartridge, built for Zaire. For Bundibugyo, the regulatory door stays shut: Ervebo is not licensed and clinical protection has not been demonstrated. On 7 August 2026, WHO recommended taking it directly into a Phase III study in the current outbreak after new non-human-primate, ferret and pseudovirus-neutralisation evidence suggested possible cross-protection. On 20 August, WHO and Africa CDC allocated 70,000 doses: 20,000 for the Phase III study and 50,000 for health and frontline workers, in line with SAGE recommendations at the time; protection in humans remains unknown, and informed consent is required. On 27 August, Ervebo vaccination began in Kisangani. AP describes the 50,000 doses as a compassionate-use programme, separate from the randomized study cohort. The WHO guidance published on 1 September and dated 31 August says the evidence remains insufficient to establish clinically meaningful protection in humans and recommends using Ervebo against Bundibugyo only within research protocols. The approved drugs are Inmazeb and Ebanga, both for Zaire only. The BRAVO follow-up study, launched in Bunia on 19 September, follows 20,000 frontline workers over time; MSF does not present it as a randomized Phase III study, and the sources do not say whether it is the announced study or a separate one.

The economics of proof

A drug is only proved during an outbreak

Ervebo, Inmazeb and Ebanga were approved on the strength of studies run on people during outbreaks. That is how anyone finds out whether an Ebola vaccine or treatment works: you give it to people who have the disease or are about to be exposed to it, and you compare what happens to them. There is no other place and no other moment to do it.

Ervebo exists because the West African epidemic between 2013 and 2016 left more than 11,000 dead and, with them, enough sick people for a trial. Inmazeb and Ebanga came out of the 2018 to 2020 outbreak in DR Congo.

Both previous Bundibugyo outbreaks were too small for that. The first, in Uganda in 2007 and 2008, had 131 reported cases and 42 deaths. The second, in DR Congo in 2012, had 62 cases and 34 deaths. There were never enough sick people to prove anything, and never enough well people for a manufacturer to sell to.

There is a European document that says this out loud. When the European Medicines Agency recommended the two-dose Ebola vaccine Zabdeno and Mvabea in May 2020, it wrote that the authorisation was granted under exceptional circumstances „because the applicant was able to demonstrate that it is not possible to conduct a randomised controlled study that might generate comprehensive clinical data on the efficacy of the new Ebola vaccine even after authorisation”. The regulator wrote down the trap in 2020 and licensed the product anyway.

Nobody ever bought it. On 1 May 2026 the European Commission withdrew the authorisation at the manufacturer’s request, for commercial reasons. Fourteen days later, DR Congo declared an Ebola outbreak.

Ebola countermeasures on the European and United States registers, 25 July 2026
ProductSpecies coveredStatus
ErveboZaireauthorised in the EU since November 2019
Zabdeno and MvabeaZaireEU authorisation withdrawn on 1 May 2026
InmazebZaireapproved in the United States, not in the EU
EbangaZaireapproved in the United States, not in the EU

The world’s filovirus kit is not a map of the dangerous viruses. It is a register of the outbreaks that grew large enough to be used as proof.

The three Bundibugyo outbreaks

The window

A treatment can only be proved while there are patients who can enter a trial.Every dot is one reported case.The first two outbreaks ended at 131 and 62 cases.There is no universal threshold: the number needed depends on the treatment, mortality and trial design.

2 July 2026PARTNERS opened in Bunia on 2 July 2026. The epidemiological situation reported for 1–2 July contained 1,481 confirmed cases in DR Congo, Uganda and France.

2 July 2026 PARTNERS begins enrolment 2007 and 2008 Uganda 2012 DR Congo 2026 DR Congo

131 reported cases. 42 deaths.

62 reported cases. 34 deaths.

8,067 cases, 3,901 deaths and 2,070 recoveries across seven provinces, according to the 26 September tally published by NICD. Africa CDC warns that local slowing does not establish control of the outbreak.

2 July: PARTNERS begins enrolling patients.

The third outbreak created the first window in which a trial could begin.

The 2007 and 2012 figures are reported cases from the US CDC. The current NICD tally of 26 September is 8,067 cases, 3,901 deaths and 2,070 recoveries across seven provinces. As an earlier reference, the DRC report with data through 16 September, relayed by ECDC on 18 September, gives 7,475 confirmed cases and 3,605 deaths across seven provinces. The government considers the peak reached in August, but the independent Africa CDC assessment of 17 September says the data do not yet allow that conclusion. The daily series may be revised retrospectively.

Uganda, 2022

Success destroyed the evidence

4years between the drug and the question still unanswered

In 2022 Uganda had an outbreak of Sudan ebolavirus. There was no approved treatment for Sudan either, so some patients were given MBP134, a pair of antibodies designed to cover several ebolavirus species at once. It was given , outside any trial, because there was nothing else to give.

Uganda stopped the outbreak faster than anyone expected. The outbreak ended before anyone could find out whether the drug had worked.

In July 2026 MBP134 entered the first trial that tests it in patients, in Bunia. Same drug. Same question. Four years in between, and it took another outbreak.

24 August · first published human clinical data. A confirmed Bundibugyo case received MBP134, remdesivir and supportive care, recovered and was discharged. Separately, five contacts, one adult and four children, received MBP134 after exposure and remained free of disease with negative PCR tests during 21 days of follow-up. These are the first published clinical observations of MBP134 in Bundibugyo, but they do not yet show efficacy. There were no control groups, and randomized trial results are not available.

25 August 2026

What remains at Day 100

Day 100of 100Day 0 · 17 May 2026Day 100 · 25 August 2026

Day 100 · 25 August 2026. The 100 Days Mission clock for Bundibugyo has reached its final milestone. The table below preserves the historical Day 98 snapshot; IPPS’s official Day 100 assessment is summarised in the block that follows.

Historical snapshot · Day 98
SpeciesRapid test in the fieldLicensed vaccineApproved treatment
ZaireGeneXpert cartridgeErveboInmazeb, Ebanga
Sudannonenonenone
BundibugyoRADI kit, under validationnonenone
Taï Forestnonenonenone

The flat line is the negative result, the same trace as in the plot at the top. Here it means nothing exists.

  • On 2 July the first patient was enrolled in Bunia into PARTNERS, the trial testing MBP134 and remdesivir, separately and together.
  • On 14 July EBO-PEP began, giving obeldesivir, a drug taken by mouth, to people who have been exposed to the virus.
  • On 1 June, CEPI put money behind three candidate vaccines: up to 3.2 million dollars for IAVI, 8.6 million for Oxford with the Serum Institute of India, 50 million for Moderna.
  • On 13 July the University of Oxford announced the world’s first human trial of a Bundibugyo vaccine. Fifty healthy volunteers between 18 and 55, in Oxford. The announcement counts 57 days since the emergency was declared.
  • On 7 August WHO’s technical group recommended taking Ervebo directly into a Phase III study in the current outbreak to test possible cross-protection. Ervebo is not yet licensed for Bundibugyo.
  • 22 May–22 August · superseded version of the IHR Temporary Recommendations. The set issued by WHO on 22 May reached the automatic three-month limit under the International Health Regulations. The Emergency Committee met again on 18 August, and WHO published the updated set that replaces it on 24 August. The international emergency has a separate legal status and remains in force.
  • 21 August · the first doses reach DR Congo. More than 16,000 Ervebo doses arrived in Kinshasa. The DRC Ministry of Health and ACP give 16,520; AP and AFP reported 16,250. ACP describes this shipment as part of 50,120 doses expected between 21 and 24 August. WHO allocated 70,000 doses in total: 20,000 for the Phase III trial and 50,000 for frontline and health workers.
  • 22 August · available stock is smaller than the allocation. INSP’s director says the DRC currently has 20,750 doses available: 20,000 for the Phase III trial and 750 for frontline workers. The first announced strategy is a vaccination belt around Ituri to limit spread towards Tshopo, Haut-Uele and Bas-Uele. Ervebo remains unlicensed for Bundibugyo, and its clinical effectiveness against this species has not been demonstrated.
  • 24 August · current WHO Temporary Recommendations. The new document details surveillance, case detection, diagnosis, clinical care and infection control, and adds measures for public gatherings, domestic mobility and inland water transport. WHO explicitly maintains that there is still no approved vaccine or treatment for Bundibugyo and calls for head-to-head comparisons of field PCR platforms and robust clinical trials of candidate vaccines and therapeutics.
  • 27 August · administration begins. In Kisangani, the health minister officially launched vaccination for health workers and other frontline response workers; people who have had contact with patients are next. Ervebo is being used against Bundibugyo before efficacy for this species has been demonstrated: it remains licensed only for Zaire, and the Phase III study is meant to establish whether cross-protection exists. The BRAVO follow-up study, launched in Bunia on 19 September, follows 20,000 frontline workers over time; MSF does not present it as a randomized Phase III study, and the sources do not say whether it is the announced study or a separate one.
  • 28 August · WHO publishes Disease Outbreak News no. 616. With data through 26 August, WHO reports 5,794 confirmed cases, 2,786 confirmed deaths and 60 affected health zones in the DRC. Biena and Manguredjipa are the two new zones in North Kivu.
  • 28 August · WHO IHR Emergency Committee report. The outbreak remains a public health emergency of international concern and does not meet the criteria for a pandemic emergency. On 12 August, about 1,000 beds were available against an estimated need for 3,000; mortality-based modelling gave a 21-day doubling time and an Rt of 1.55. Models suggest three to four times as many infections as surveillance captures, with moderate confidence. WHO found no evidence of a fundamental change in the virus’s biology or modes of transmission.
  • 30 August · SitRep N°108/MVEBDB/30/08/2026 from the DRC National Institute of Public Health, published on 31 August. The tally reaches 6,100 confirmed cases and 2,950 confirmed deaths across 60 affected health zones; no new health zone was affected in the previous 24 hours.
  • 1 September · WHO tightens the Ervebo recommendation. The emergency guidance published on 1 September and dated 31 August says evidence remains insufficient to establish clinically meaningful protection against Bundibugyo and recommends using the vaccine only within research protocols.
  • 2 September · the official tally passes 3,000 deaths. Covering data through 31 August, the latest DRC Ministry of Health and National Institute of Public Health report, cited by Actualité.cd and independently confirmed by AP and Reuters, gives 6,186 confirmed cases, 3,007 deaths and 1,409 recoveries; about 830 people remain in isolation or Ebola treatment centres.
  • 3 September · ECDC updates its outbreak page. Congolese authorities reported 6,250 confirmed cases, including 3,039 deaths, with data through 1 September. ECDC gives 1,439 recoveries, 869 patients in isolation and 60 of 151 affected health zones, and notes that the figures remain under review and harmonisation.
  • 4 September · ECDC and WHO publish the same official tally. With data through 2 September, the DRC report reaches 6,342 confirmed cases and 3,072 deaths; 1,475 people have recovered, 770 patients are hospitalised in isolation and 60 of 151 health zones are affected. WHO Africa also reports the launch in Kinshasa of a revised 180-day multisectoral response plan.
  • 14 September · ECDC updates its outbreak page again. With data through 12 September, the DRC report reaches 7,200 confirmed cases and 3,475 deaths. There are 923 patients hospitalised in isolation, 88% of identified contacts are under follow-up, and 62 of 167 health zones are affected across seven provinces. ECDC notes that the figures remain under review and harmonisation.
  • 15 September · the tally and its interpretation separate. The UN/WHO briefing gives 7,258 confirmed cases and 3,510 deaths across seven provinces. The government says daily cases have fallen from about 120 to 80 and considers the peak passed, but WHO cautions that it is too early to declare a turning point. Some areas are improving while others continue to rise.
  • 17 September · Africa CDC says the peak is not yet demonstrated. The Emergency Consultative Group completes an independent scientific review: declines in some hotspots, including Ituri, are encouraging, but transmission is rising in some zones, especially North Kivu, and the available data do not confirm that the peak has been reached. The Group recommends keeping the continental emergency and intensifying the response.
  • 18 September · ECDC relays the new DRC tally. With data through 16 September, the report reaches 7,475 confirmed cases and 3,605 deaths, 71 cases and 32 deaths more than the previous report. There are 905 patients hospitalised in isolation, 1,798 recoveries, 87.6% of contacts under follow-up and 62 of 167 zones affected across seven provinces. ECDC notes that the figures remain under review and harmonisation.
  • 19 September · the BRAVO study begins in Bunia. MSF and Epicentre, with the DRC Ministry of Health, Africa CDC and INRB, launch BRAVO, a follow-up study for frontline workers in Ituri and North Kivu, covering 20,000 people over nine to twelve months: three months of Ervebo vaccination and at least six months of follow-up. The study gathers real-world data on the effect of Ervebo against Bundibugyo; participation and vaccination are voluntary. Ervebo remains licensed only for Zaire virus, and any benefit against Bundibugyo remains to be demonstrated. MSF does not present BRAVO as a randomized Phase III study, and the sources do not say whether it is the announced study or a separate one.
  • 26 September · NICD reports 8,067 cases, 3,901 deaths and 2,070 recoveries across seven provinces. No vaccine or treatment is approved for Bundibugyo virus.
  • 29 September · the UN Geneva briefing cites WHO as reporting more than 1,600 beds across 50 centres and nearly 400 trained workers; it does not state the observation date.
  • 30 September · a WHO Africa feature gives a dated series: 929 beds on 27 July and 1,510 on 21 September across 54 facilities in 34 health zones. On 21 September, 326 more beds were being installed and 146 were planned; the expansion needed more than 1,400 additional health professionals.

On that same 13 July, at Rwampara general hospital inside the epicentre, epidemiologists, case investigators, drivers and gravediggers went on strike because they had not been paid since the outbreak began. On Wednesday staff at Bunia general hospital struck too and blocked the entrance. Confirmed cases were passing 2,000 that week, with 754 dead.

The Oxford trial runs on healthy volunteers in a country with no Ebola. It shows whether that candidate is safe and whether it raises an immune response. Whether it protects anyone can only be learned where the disease is, which means Ituri, during the outbreak. Ervebo is at a different stage: on 20 August, WHO/SAGE supported limited use outside the study for health and frontline workers, while WHO recommended testing it directly in this outbreak. The WHO guidance published on 1 September and dated 31 August now recommends using it against Bundibugyo only within research protocols; it is not licensed or proven for Bundibugyo. If the outbreak is stopped before the Oxford study can answer the protection question, that candidate remains unlicensed. Oxford delivered in 57 days. The structure it delivered into is the part that does not hold. A Correspondence published in Nature Medicine on 26 August quantified that pressure using INSP data from 2 August: Ebola treatment centres in North Kivu were operating at 131.9% capacity, with 186 patients for 141 declared beds, while some centres in Ituri were above 200%; Nizi had reached 278%. The authors warn that overcrowding makes rapid, safe isolation harder and may sustain transmission. These figures describe operations on 2 August. The article is a Correspondence; it quantifies operational pressure without establishing how many infections overcrowding caused.

If too few people have your disease, nobody can prove a treatment works, so nobody makes one. Ebola is the most violent version of the logic that decides whether a drug exists for a rare disease on a children’s ward in Bucharest or in Bristol.

Audit

Sources

What this is and what it is not

Evidence was searched through 30 September 2026. The latest tally used is the NICD report of 26 September: 8,067 cases, 3,901 deaths and 2,070 recoveries across seven provinces. ECDC data from 16–21 September remain historical references. Africa CDC cautions that local slowing does not establish control of the outbreak. The text covers the regulatory position in the European Union and United States. There was no clinical review.

What is written here is public information, not medical advice. Anyone who develops a fever after travelling in an area with Ebola should call ahead and say where they have been before walking into a waiting room.

What kinds of claim are here

  • documented facthas a primary source, listed below
  • a number that movescarries its date beside it
  • editorial inferencejoins documented facts and is written as such

The outbreak

The detection gap

Vaccines and treatments

History and virology

Updated 29 September 2026. Outbreak figures are tied to the date written beside them and may be revised.