Gamma took up more of the signal
Broad-band gamma rose from 0.93% of relative power in the interictal window to 8.43% during bilateral suppression. Its absolute power also peaked in that window.
Original research · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2022
A rare 900-second EEG recording around cardiac arrest changed its mix before it faded. Slower rhythms weakened. For a short window, gamma occupied a larger share of what the electrodes still recorded.
One patient. One clinical case. Electrical activity is not a report of consciousness.
Read the traceThe recording moves through four windows. The signal changes shape before it reaches the post-arrest segment.
Read the result first
Broad-band gamma rose from 0.93% of relative power in the interictal window to 8.43% during bilateral suppression. Its absolute power also peaked in that window.
Delta, theta, and alpha coherence fell in the post-arrest window. Faster bands stayed broadly similar, with a small narrow-gamma increase.
The paper measured voltage patterns between electrodes. It did not measure a person's experience, memory, or awareness.
All values on this page come from Vicente et al., 2022. Read the original paper ↗
Four windows, one recording
Each window is a 30-second slice chosen by the authors. Select one to compare the relative share of the six frequency bands. Relative power answers a narrow question: what portion of the analysed signal sits in each band?
II / interictal interval
385–415 seconds
This is the comparison point after seizure activity and before the recorded suppression stages. Delta dominates the analysed power, while gamma remains a small share.
In this window, the broad-band gamma share is 0.93%. The same measure reaches 8.43% in BS.
Interictal interval selected. Broad-band gamma is 0.93 percent of relative power.
| Window | Delta | Theta | Alpha | Beta | γ narrow | γ broad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II · relative % | 49.86 | 1.43 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 1.36 | 0.93 |
| LS · relative % | 41.96 | 1.35 | 0.65 | 1.22 | 2.55 | 1.95 |
| BS · relative % | 27.65 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 1.65 | 5.55 | 8.43 |
| Post-CA · relative % | 37.32 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.14 | 2.33 | 2.34 |
| II · absolute μV² | 3.0659 | 0.0615 | 0.0200 | 0.0326 | 0.0583 | 0.0382 |
| LS · absolute μV² | 1.7987 | 0.0339 | 0.0134 | 0.0228 | 0.0506 | 0.0402 |
| BS · absolute μV² | 1.9736 | 0.0142 | 0.0140 | 0.0414 | 0.1399 | 0.2041 |
| Post-CA · absolute μV² | 0.8381 | 0.0121 | 0.0053 | 0.0093 | 0.0189 | 0.0198 |
Relative power is each band divided by the total power across the analysed bands. It should not be read as total brain activity.
The vocabulary of the trace
EEG is not one note. The analysis separates the recording by frequency, then asks how the parts change together.
The slowest band in this analysis. Its absolute power declines across the recording.
Low-frequency activity that falls sharply after left and bilateral suppression.
A slower rhythm that matters here because its phase modulates gamma amplitude.
A faster band whose absolute power falls in the post-arrest window.
One of two high-frequency bands. Its relative share rises in BS.
The band with the largest relative-power jump in the source table.
When rhythms meet
Phase-amplitude coupling asks whether the amplitude of a faster rhythm changes at particular points in the cycle of a slower one. Choose a window. The grid shows modulation indices from the left lateral electrode group, with the strongest published result called out in the margin.
MI = modulation index. Higher values mean a stronger phase-amplitude relationship in this analysis.
How the signal was read
The team recorded the electrical potential at 16 scalp electrodes, alongside an EKG trace, at 512 samples per second. They then split the recording into overlapping two-second epochs, calculated power with a fast Fourier transform, and measured coupling with the Hilbert transform.
For coherence, they compared electrode pairs with a magnitude-squared coherence measure. The final charts average those pairwise relationships across the four windows.
Every step describes the recording. None of the steps can recover a private experience that was not recorded.
What this cannot tell us
The recording is striking because it captures a rare transition in a real clinical setting. It is also narrow. The patient was an 87-year-old man with traumatic subdural hematoma, seizures, medication, and severe brain injury. The study had no healthy comparison and no uninterrupted pre-event baseline.
The safest conclusion is the smallest one: in this recording, several rhythms changed together around cardiac arrest. The study does not show that the patient was conscious, replaying memories, or having a near-death experience.
The authors say the original contributions are included in the article and supplementary material. Open the supplementary material ↗
Source trail
Adapted as an independent editorial explainer by Marius Comper. This page is educational and is not medical advice. Read the page as Markdown.