mariuscomper.ukRO

31 million house sales in HM Land Registry records, 1995⁠–⁠2026 · England and Wales

The missing number 13: the house number new streets in England and Wales leave out

On two in three new streets built since 1995 that are long enough to have one, no house numbered 13 has ever been sold: the numbers jump from 12 to 14, or from 11 to 15. The number 13s that do exist sell for the same as the houses either side.

How often do new streets skip number 13?

When a street is built, every new home is sold at least once, and HM Land Registry records the sale with the address. So on a new street the sales record is close to a full list of the door numbers.

Take the 45,244 streets in England and Wales where numbers 11 and 15 were both first sold as new homes since 1995. On 67% of them, no house numbered 13 has been sold at all, new or later. That is the number this page means by a street with no 13; streets too short to reach 15 are not counted.

Any number can be absent for ordinary reasons: a home kept by a housing association, a sale not recorded, a plot built later. The same test for numbers 9, 11, 15, 17, 19 and 21 measures that background: they are missing on 2.4% of streets. Thirteen is missing 28 times as often. Allowing for the background, roughly two in three new streets leave it out on purpose.

A second register agrees. Every new home since 2008 needs an energy certificate, sold or not, and the government's certificate search lists them by postcode. On 25 of these streets built since 2010, picked at random, it lists no number 13 at all; on six streets where a 13 was sold, the same search found every one.

0%25%50%5: 2.5%57: 2.6%79: 2.4%911: 2.5%1113: 66.7%1367%15: 2.7%1517: 2.4%1719: 2.3%1921: 2.3%2123: 2.2%2325: 2.2%2527: 2.4%2729: 2.3%2931: 2.0%3133: 2.1%3335: 2.2%3537: 2.1%3739: 2.3%3941: 1.9%41
Share of new-build streets where a door number never appears in sales, though the numbers two below and two above were both sold new. England and Wales, streets first sold 1995–2026.

What takes its place? Almost always nothing: the numbers simply jump. Of the 30,162 new streets with no 13, 204 have an 11A and 184 a 12A instead.

Has it always been like this?

It was already the norm when the record begins: 73% of the streets first sold in 1995–1999 have no 13. It has been falling since the mid-2000s, to 56% for streets first sold in 2019–2023. Still more than half.

The last two years are shaded: their streets are still being sold, so some numbers, 13 included, may yet appear.

0%25%50%75%100%1995200020052010201520202025Number 13Other odd numbers
No number 13, by the year a street's first new home was sold, against the same test for other odd numbers.

Which councils let builders leave out 13?

The decision belongs to the council: outside London under the Towns Improvement Clauses Act 1847 and the Public Health Act 1925, in London under the London Building Acts. Some councils rule out skipping 13 in writing. Hastings: “All numbers, including the number 13, must be used in the proper sequence.” Others leave it out by default; for new homes in an existing street, Adur and Worthing say: “All numbers (except the number 13, as this is excluded) must be used and allocated accordingly in sequential order.”

Before looking at any council, the expected result was written down: councils that forbid skipping should look like the background rate (under 25%), councils that exclude 13 should be high (over 70%).

no 13has a 13

Each dot is a new-build street where 11 and 15 were sold new, placed at its commonest postcode: no 13 sold (bright) or a 13 sold (grey).

The prediction mostly failed. South Derbyshire (99%), Welwyn Hatfield (10%) and Neath Port Talbot (6%) behaved as written down; Worthing (62%) fell short of the 70% expected, and Adur had too few streets to count. Four councils whose policies forbid gaps skip 13 most of the time anyway: Warwick 96%, Hastings 83%, Leeds 78% and Oxford 68%. Leeds's policy bans gaps without naming 13. Timing explains some of it. Hastings adopted its ban in July 2013: 29 of its 30 new streets first sold before 2014 lack a 13; all five since have one. Leeds fell from 98% (streets first sold up to 2008) to 31% (since 2016). Warwick barely moved (100% to 89%).

Councils differ enormously. Of the 284 councils with at least 30 new streets in the record, 89 left out 13 on nine in ten or more of them, 39 on one in ten or fewer, and the other 156 somewhere between.

CouncilNew streetsNo 13Other numbers missing
Warrington230100%3%
Amber Valley178100%1%
South Ribble173100%2%
Walsall165100%2%
Oldham145100%2%
Solihull133100%2%
Chichester126100%3%
North East Derbyshire115100%3%
Gedling108100%5%
Wirral104100%2%
South Tyneside91100%2%
Tamworth89100%3%
Chesterfield79100%3%
Hyndburn54100%3%
Wakefield57399%2%
South Derbyshire33299%2%
Stratford-on-Avon26799%5%
Knowsley24599%1%
Liverpool20699%3%
South Oxfordshire17899%2%
Telford and Wrekin34499%2%
Basildon16299%2%
Redcar and Cleveland15099%2%
Mansfield14199%2%
Bolsover12799%1%
Sunderland24999%3%
City of Wolverhampton10599%2%
West Northamptonshire62799%2%
Kirklees30899%1%
Newark and Sherwood19999%2%
Fareham9599%2%
Barnsley36699%2%
North Kesteven26799%2%
Swindon34899%2%
South Staffordshire8599%5%
South Hams8599%1%
Lichfield16199%2%
South Kesteven23599%2%
Newcastle-under-Lyme7499%3%
East Suffolk28999%3%
Wyre13899%3%
Bury13699%1%
Gloucester13699%3%
Sandwell20399%2%
Wiltshire65698%2%
East Staffordshire18998%4%
Darlington18998%1%
Test Valley18598%3%
Ribble Valley12298%1%
West Berkshire11998%2%
Wokingham23198%2%
Bracknell Forest17398%1%
Bradford40398%2%
Arun16698%2%
Dudley16298%3%
City of Peterborough30898%1%
Charnwood25398%2%
Doncaster35498%2%
Blaby14998%1%
North West Leicestershire24398%2%
Wigan40598%1%
City of Plymouth13198%4%
North Lincolnshire19097%2%
City of Kingston upon Hull22397%2%
Central Bedfordshire52797%2%
Sefton10597%2%
Blackburn with Darwen15797%3%
Hinckley and Bosworth15697%3%
Blackpool5296%1%
County Durham70096%2%
Warwick22496%2%
Huntingdonshire26095%2%
Wyre Forest6495%4%
Wychavon16795%4%
New Forest6095%2%
Newcastle upon Tyne21195%2%
East Hampshire10994%1%
Braintree22594%2%
Gosport6894%1%
Pendle6794%1%
South Gloucestershire33593%3%
Mid Suffolk16593%4%
North Tyneside22592%1%
West Lindsey16192%4%
Havant7192%2%
Middlesbrough14390%2%
Reading5190%2%
West Devon8190%2%
Fylde10090%6%
Flintshire14490%3%
Wrexham10989%3%
Salford19388%2%
Newport19088%2%
Bolton16487%3%
West Lancashire12286%1%
St. Helens17986%2%
Winchester14786%3%
Calderdale11986%2%
Buckinghamshire44486%2%
West Suffolk20785%2%
Coventry22584%1%
East Riding of Yorkshire51284%2%
Somerset62584%3%
Slough7083%2%
Hastings3583%8%
Staffordshire Moorlands6483%3%
Vale of White Horse19783%2%
Cheshire West and Chester41683%2%
Tendring13182%2%
Rossendale5082%4%
Rotherham29381%2%
Burnley6281%1%
Dacorum6580%2%
York12480%5%
Tameside16379%1%
Babergh11178%2%
Torbay7878%2%
Leeds64178%1%
City of Nottingham10778%2%
Worcester9878%3%
Ashfield18477%3%
Birmingham24677%3%
Halton13975%2%
Three Rivers5573%0%
City of Derby18572%2%
Erewash7872%1%
North Yorkshire65672%3%
Bath and North East Somerset10571%3%
East Cambridgeshire13571%1%
Eastbourne6170%2%
North Hertfordshire10570%1%
Fenland11570%3%
Eastleigh12669%3%
County of Herefordshire14668%3%
Redditch6668%3%
Oxford5068%2%
Torridge10368%3%
Forest of Dean6868%4%
Sheffield21368%2%
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole7168%5%
Swansea14568%2%
Conwy6766%4%
Broxbourne8764%1%
Hertsmere4764%1%
Powys6563%6%
Stockton-on-Tees34462%2%
Worthing3762%1%
Hart10762%2%
West Oxfordshire15161%2%
Elmbridge4860%0%
Sevenoaks4760%5%
Great Yarmouth7459%4%
Stafford16959%4%
Trafford6058%1%
Manchester27658%1%
North Somerset23358%3%
Broadland20456%0%
Lancaster9156%2%
Broxtowe7556%2%
Rochford7655%3%
Bassetlaw18154%3%
High Peak8553%3%
Wealden17052%3%
Monmouthshire9651%2%
Gateshead15351%2%
Maldon7551%3%
North Northamptonshire64550%2%
Ipswich6850%1%
Chorley18849%2%
Basingstoke and Deane19949%2%
Cornwall42049%3%
Cheltenham6048%1%
Lewes3247%3%
City of Stoke-on-Trent16846%2%
Stockport9345%1%
Stroud10945%3%
Rushcliffe17645%3%
Cheshire East58045%2%
Dorset31045%4%
Rugby17244%2%
Canterbury12344%3%
Shropshire31842%3%
Bromsgrove9441%3%
City of Southampton4641%2%
Gravesham3941%1%
Teignbridge13140%2%
Tewkesbury16939%4%
East Devon15839%3%
Cambridge6538%4%
Melton7537%1%
the Vale of Glamorgan13137%3%
Derbyshire Dales5237%2%
Medway18236%2%
Mid Sussex15636%3%
Reigate and Banstead9635%2%
East Lindsey11635%4%
Westmorland and Furness15335%2%
North Warwickshire3735%3%
City of Bristol10435%4%
Tunbridge Wells6434%1%
Thanet4434%2%
Guildford6930%2%
Dartford16930%1%
Horsham17428%2%
Cotswold5828%3%
Boston8127%2%
King's Lynn and West Norfolk10726%3%
Northumberland45426%2%
Malvern Hills7026%4%
Rochdale15226%3%
Lincoln7224%3%
Norwich7723%1%
South Holland14822%2%
Cardiff20822%2%
Rother4122%3%
Exeter11522%2%
Redbridge5221%1%
Tandridge4420%3%
Epsom and Ewell3020%1%
Dover6620%3%
Cumberland23819%2%
Pembrokeshire4719%5%
Runnymede3818%3%
Maidstone17518%2%
Torfaen5518%6%
Ashford20016%2%
Mid Devon9516%2%
Tonbridge and Malling13516%3%
Wandsworth3915%1%
Folkestone and Hythe8815%3%
Hillingdon4815%2%
Waverley4914%4%
Tower Hamlets3514%2%
Rutland5213%3%
North Norfolk7212%3%
Denbighshire5712%6%
Surrey Heath4912%1%
Uttlesford13312%2%
City of Leicester12612%2%
Carmarthenshire9512%6%
Cherwell21611%3%
Rushmoor7411%2%
Windsor and Maidenhead3811%4%
Stevenage4910%1%
North East Lincolnshire11910%2%
Bromley5110%4%
Crawley5210%3%
Welwyn Hatfield6310%2%
Isle of Wight559%5%
Thurrock1598%1%
Barking and Dagenham538%4%
Woking408%2%
North Devon837%4%
Hounslow427%3%
Swale1737%3%
Rhondda Cynon Taf1467%4%
St. Albans757%4%
Caerphilly1396%4%
Bridgend1306%2%
Epping Forest496%1%
Neath Port Talbot856%2%
Greenwich735%1%
Bexley565%1%
Breckland1685%2%
East Hertfordshire1475%2%
Sutton464%2%
Enfield464%4%
Chelmsford1054%4%
Hartlepool1443%2%
Preston1203%3%
Kingston upon Thames303%2%
Bedford2283%1%
Cannock Chase983%3%
Milton Keynes4633%2%
Newham353%6%
Oadby and Wigston393%2%
Colchester2422%2%
Nuneaton and Bedworth1672%2%
Havering562%0%
South Cambridgeshire2291%2%
Barnet911%3%
South Norfolk2331%2%
Harborough2011%2%
Harlow650%1%

Councils that changed their minds

Comparing streets first sold up to 2008 with streets first sold since 2016, the share of new streets without a 13 changed by more than 50 percentage points in 48 of the 204 councils with at least 20 new streets in each period. 45 now leave out 13 far less often; three began leaving it out. That is much of why the national share has been falling.

0%100%50%Leeds1995–2008 98%2016–2026 31%Cheshire East1995–2008 98%2016–2026 4%Northumberland1995–2008 57%2016–2026 2%Cornwall1995–2008 85%2016–2026 8%Stockton-on-Tees1995–2008 99%2016–2026 2%Shropshire1995–2008 76%2016–2026 5%Rotherham1995–2008 98%2016–2026 26%Manchester1995–2008 66%2016–2026 5%North Somerset1995–2008 87%2016–2026 3%Vale of White Horse1995–2008 7%2016–2026 99%High Peak1995–2008 25%2016–2026 88%Melton1995–2008 10%2016–2026 64%

1995–20082016–2026began leaving out 13

Share of new streets with no number 13, streets first sold 1995–2008 against 2016–2026 (the last two years still selling). The councils that changed most; councils as they are today.

Does a number 13 sell for less?

Every Halloween and every Friday 13th, the same story goes round: number 13s sell for thousands less. In October 2024 an estate agent put the gap at £36,000, comparing the average number-13 sale in January–August 2024 with the average of all sales.

Run that method on the same months of the same Land Registry file and number-13 sales averaged £333,297, against £353,768 for everything: 5.8% less. By medians, which the release's table names, the gap is 1.8%. Neither reproduces the 12.2% published, whose exact selection was not given. The bigger problem is what 'everything' contains. 14% of sales have no plain door number: mostly flats in named blocks, but also houses with a name instead of a number, cottages and farmhouses among them, which are 3% of all sales and average £656,000. Against homes with a plain door number, number 13 is −2.3%. And by the same arithmetic numbers 11, 12 and 15 'sell for less' too (11 −4.5%, 12 −6.8%, 15 −6.5%).

From the whole country to the house next door

Against other numbered homes sold the same year−4.3%Against numbered homes in the same council, same year−5.5%Same council and year, same house type, new or old−1.3%Houses on the same street, same type, tenure and year: against 11 and 15+0.1%
How much less a number 13 sells for as the comparison narrows. Standard sales of homes numbered 1 to 60, 1995–2026; the last step, houses only.

The fair comparison is with the houses either side, on the same street, of the same type, sold in the same year. Over 24,595 streets, number 13 sold for +0.1% compared with numbers 11 and 15. A discount larger than 0.16% (about £450 on a typical number-13 house) lies outside the 95% interval. Every other odd number tested the same way, from 5 to 41, is also within a fraction of a percent of its neighbours.

Nor do owners leave number 13 sooner. On streets where 11, 13 and 15 have all been sold, each number 13 changed hands 2.04 times on average since 1995; its neighbours, 2.05.

−0.50%−0.25%0+0.25%+0.50%5: +0.12%57: +0.14%79: +0.25%911: −0.05%1113: +0.10%1315: −0.16%1517: +0.08%1719: +0.15%1921: −0.02%2123: +0.07%2325: +0.11%2527: +0.10%2729: +0.14%2931: +0.14%3133: +0.13%3335: +0.01%3537: +0.18%3739: +0.15%3941: −0.13%41
Price of each odd door number compared with the numbers two below and two above it, same street, same type, same tenure, same year. Bars are 95% intervals.

Do people avoid moving on Friday the 13th?

Yes, and here the superstition shows up in the record. Of 54 Fridays the 13th since 1995 (Good Friday 2001 left out, as are all bank holidays), 53 had fewer completed sales than the typical Friday of the same month.

Sales pile up towards the end of each month, so the fair test is the Fridays either side in the calendar. A Friday on the 12th runs at 95% of the month's typical Friday, a Friday on the 14th at 102%. A Friday the 13th runs at 66%: about a third fewer. The next quietest date is the 2nd, at 82%, just after New Year and month-end.

0%50%100%150%1: 90%12: 82%3: 86%4: 89%5: 87%56: 90%7: 85%8: 89%9: 89%10: 92%1011: 93%12: 95%13: 66%1314: 102%15: 103%1516: 98%17: 97%18: 107%19: 105%20: 112%2021: 97%22: 108%23: 113%24: 119%25: 135%2526: 142%27: 165%28: 169%29: 173%30: 179%31: 166%31
Completed sales on a Friday, by date of the month, against the typical Friday of the same month (median, 1995–2026).

So the superstition moves the moving date. It does not move the price.

Is Flat 13 skipped too?

Inside blocks, yes, though less often. In 16,975 blocks where Flat 12 and Flat 14 have both been sold, no Flat 13 has been sold in 41% of them; for Flats 11, 12, 14 and 15 the same test gives about 11%.

Questions

Why do new streets skip number 13?

Councils decide street numbering. Some exclude 13 by default, some leave it out only on request, and others refuse to omit any number; Warwick's policy, for one, says no number will be left out for superstitious, cultural or personal reasons.

Do number 13 houses sell for less?

Not compared with their neighbours. On the same street, for the same type of house sold in the same year, number 13 sells for +0.1% compared with numbers 11 and 15. National averages that show a discount compare 13 with every sale, including houses with a name instead of a number, which sell for far more.

How many streets have no number 13?

Among streets built in England and Wales since 1995 where 11 and 15 were both sold new, 67% have never recorded a sale of a number 13. Older streets cannot be measured the same way, because many of their houses have not been sold since 1995.

Does this cover Scotland and Northern Ireland?

No. HM Land Registry covers England and Wales only.

How this was measured, and sources

A street is the same street name, town and postcode district (the Land Registry's locality field is left out: it is filled in inconsistently and split streets in two). Each new street is placed in today's council by its commonest postcode, so councils merged since 1995 (Buckinghamshire, Cornwall, Cheshire East, North Yorkshire and others) carry their predecessors' decisions. Door numbers are read from the address of each sale (plain numbers, with or without a letter). Numbers on new streets come from sales flagged as new builds.

Price comparisons use standard sales (category A) of houses, with the log of each price compared with the average of sales on the same street, of the same type and tenure, in the same year; differences are averaged by street and the uncertainty is taken across streets.

Limits: a home kept by a council or housing association, or a sale the Land Registry does not record, looks the same as a missing number. That is why every rate here is set against the same test for other numbers. Older streets are not counted for skipping.

Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026; Royal Mail data © Royal Mail copyright and database right 2026; National Statistics data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

  • HM Land Registry, Price Paid Data, January 1995 to September 2026 gov.uk
  • Ordnance Survey, Code-Point Open (postcode locations and councils) ordnancesurvey.co.uk
  • Energy performance certificate register, search by postcode (checked 30 October 2026) find-energy-certificate.service.gov.uk
  • Hastings Borough Council, street naming and numbering policy, 2013 hastings.gov.uk
  • Adur and Worthing Councils, naming and numbering adur-worthing.gov.uk
  • Warwick District Council, street naming and numbering policy warwickdc.gov.uk
  • Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council, street naming and numbering policy welhat.gov.uk
  • Neath Port Talbot Council, street naming and numbering policy npt.gov.uk
  • Oxford City Council, street naming and numbering policy oxford.gov.uk
  • Leeds City Council, street naming and numbering policy leeds.gov.uk
  • South Derbyshire District Council, street naming and numbering guidance southderbyshire.gov.uk
  • Melton Borough Council, street naming and numbering policy melton.gov.uk
  • Benham and Reeves, “Number 13 homeowners selling for £36,000 less this Halloween”, 30 October 2024 benhams.com
  • Rightmove, “Houses numbered ‘unlucky 13’ are valued £5,000 lower on average” (valuations, not sales), October 2023 rightmove.co.uk
  • Rightmove, “Superstitious Brits avoid moving house on Friday 13th” rightmove.co.uk
  • Larsen, “Triskaidekaphobia and North American residential real estate prices”, International Real Estate Review, 2015 corescholar.libraries.wright.edu