A7: how Russia rebuilt payment routes under sanctions
A7 gives Russian companies two ways to send money abroad. One uses foreign payment companies with bank access. The other uses A7A5 and dollar stablecoins. After sanctions and law-enforcement operations, operators shifted activity to replacement services.
Inside A7
The main route runs through banks.
The Open Source Centre investigation from June 2026 analyses more than 30,000 documents and internal messages. It describes foreign payment companies and correspondent banks linking Russian-company payments to international financial infrastructure.
A7 can send a Russian company's payment through a foreign company before the money enters international banking.
Follow one invoice
One bill, two payment routes.
A Russian importer needs to pay a supplier abroad. Follow how A7 can move that payment through two documented routes. Choose a route to see the steps.
The bank route runs through foreign accounts
OSC describes the main route in three steps. A financial instrument in Russia, a payment company abroad, then correspondent banking.
Russian importer
Owes money to an overseas supplier. Sanctions make a direct cross-border payment harder.
A7 / PSB
A7 takes the roubles and undertakes to settle the supplier's bill using a bill of exchange. Sanctioned defence-sector bank PSB co-owns A7.
Foreign payment company
A Moscow-controlled company holds accounts and liquidity outside Russia and presents itself as local. The OSC investigation identifies nodes in Kyrgyzstan, the UAE, Hong Kong, Hungary and Mongolia.
Correspondent banks
Altered trade documents and remote account access can hide Russian links. The payment then passes through international banks in major currencies.
Overseas supplier
Receives money from the foreign payment company. OSC found supplier payments reaching more than 80 jurisdictions.
The crypto route moves roubles into dollar stablecoins
A7A5 is a blockchain token that carries rouble-denominated value. Abroad, it can be exchanged for widely used dollar stablecoins.
Roubles and A7 infrastructure
The client begins inside a rouble-denominated ecosystem tied to sanctioned PSB.
Old Vector issues A7A5
Kyrgyzstan-based Old Vector issues A7A5. The issuer says each token is backed 1:1 by rouble deposits. Reuters identifies PSB as the reserve bank.
Exchange
Grinex became a main early trading venue after Garantex was disrupted. Later sanctions widened to other exchanges and service providers.
Instant Swapper
Chainalysis says the service exchanges A7A5 into widely used dollar stablecoins. KYC checks appear minimal, and more than $2.2bn has passed through the service.
Overseas counterparty
Receives a dollar stablecoin that is easier to transfer or trade internationally than A7A5.
Test the network
If you cut a node, what still works?
Sanctions history shows that activity can move after a service is lost. Choose interventions. Observed cases and analytical scenarios carry different labels.
Choose interventions
You can combine interventions. The pressure meter is qualitative and does not predict how A7 would adapt.
What changes
Historical cases carry the "observed" label. The other effects are cautious inferences from the documented network.
The highest meter level appears when several hard-to-replace dependencies come under pressure at once. It does not show that the network will collapse. Costs, spillovers and adaptation remain uncertain.
Garantex
Treasury says that, after the 6 March 2025 action, Garantex operators created Grinex infrastructure and moved customer deposits. They used A7A5 to restore equivalent balances.
A7A5 + issuer
US and UK designations and the EU transaction ban raised pressure. The wider A7 network continued operating.
Correspondent banking
OSC describes these relationships as central to the bank route. Losing them would constrain large-scale supplier payments more directly than losing a single blockchain address.
Compare the values
The $140bn sum needs context.
These values cover different dates and scopes. $93.3bn and $119.7bn refer to A7A5. TRM's >$166bn covers a broader A7-linked cluster. PSB itself declares the ≈$140bn sum.
Volume landmarks
A7A5 movements to/from Grinex-linked wallets in the first four months.
A7A5 volume in roughly ten months.
updated estimate of A7A5 volume to that date.
A7-associated on-chain volume. This measure covers a broader group than A7A5 alone. OSC says ≈$35bn appears to be circular transfers.
declared A7A5 turnover. Company-reported value without a public independent audit.
Timeline
After sanctions, new nodes appear and volume rises.
The sequence links enforcement actions to the infrastructure that appeared after them and the volume estimates published later.
The Moldova connection
Ilan Shor co-owns A7 with PSB.
Treasury places a sanctioned Moldovan oligarch among the owners of infrastructure used for Russian cross-border payments.
Ownership and state backing
U.S. Treasury says A7 and its subsidiaries are owned by sanctioned Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor and Promsvyazbank (PSB), the sanctioned Russian bank serving the defence sector. OSC documents Russian state backing and participation in the project.
OSC found A7 supplier payments reaching more than 80 jurisdictions. Treasury identifies Shor as one of A7's owners.
Source discipline
Every claim says where it comes from.
Official sanctions findings, independent blockchain estimates, company statements and editorial inferences have different statuses.
The US, UK and EU have sanctioned A7 infrastructure
Treasury, the UK and the EU have designated network entities and described A7/A7A5's role in sanctions evasion.
Chainalysis and TRM measure large volumes in different scopes
They use different scopes and methods. Both find volumes in the tens or hundreds of billions.
PSB says ≈$140bn, 15,000 customers and 2,000 payments a day
PSB's CEO made all three statements. No public independent audit is available. Turnover can count the same value repeatedly.
The investigation points to two pressure points
The move from Garantex to Grinex and the OSC investigation point to replacement exchanges, foreign payment companies and correspondent-bank access.
Sources
Evidence behind each claim.
Each source identifies the claim it supports. PSB and A7 data are labelled as operator statements.