One rate.Four ceilings.

For the people and households in Article 8, the 20,000-to-one rate led to four maximum outcomes: 75, 150, 250 or 375 stabilised lei. Registration, occupation, domicile, place in a household and proof that the compulsory grain quota had been delivered could change the result.

Compare the same stack at four counters

One stack.
Four routes.

Each window represents a legal scenario for a person or household. Change the amount and the rate stays fixed. Only the part admitted to immediate exchange moves.

old lei

Step: 100,000 old lei

Unchanged at every window

÷ 20,000 old lei for each stabilised leu

The categories overlapped. The four windows isolate four legal values. Article 8(b) treated salaried farmers as farmers, then also employees, craftspeople and everyone domiciled in rural communes.

Window 01 · Art. 8(d)

No documentary proof of a profession

Exchanged immediately 75 stabilised lei

Admitted from the stack: 1,500,000 old lei

8,500,000 old leiLeft outside the immediate exchange.

Legal route

A person who had not presented documentary proof of a profession. The same ceiling appeared in several special routes described elsewhere in Article 8.

Art. 8(d), printed page 7343

Window 02 · Art. 8(a), 8(c)

Salary, pension or documented profession

Exchanged immediately 150 stabilised lei

Admitted from the stack: 3,000,000 old lei

7,000,000 old leiLeft outside the immediate exchange.

Legal route

Public or private employees and pensioners; people listed with a documented profession; war invalids, widows and orphans. Employees who were also farmers and people treated as farmers moved instead to the ceiling in Article 8(b). Decision 17 listed the records and documents used.

Art. 8(a), 8(c), printed page 7343

Window 03 · Art. 8(b)

Head of household who was a farmer or treated as one

Exchanged immediately 250 stabilised lei

Admitted from the stack: 5,000,000 old lei

5,000,000 old leiLeft outside the immediate exchange.

Legal route

A farmer who headed a household had one ceiling for the farmer and family. The article treated salaried farmers as farmers, then also employees, craftspeople and everyone domiciled in rural communes. Decision 17 defined the rural family and household registration.

Art. 8(b), printed page 7343

Window 04 · Art. 8(b)

Agricultural family route with its grain quota delivered

Exchanged immediately 375 stabilised lei

Admitted from the stack: 7,500,000 old lei

2,500,000 old leiLeft outside the immediate exchange.

Legal route

The 5,000,000 old lei agricultural ceiling, plus 2,500,000 for an eligible household whose head had delivered the compulsory grain quota by the specified date.

Art. 8(b), printed page 7343

At 10,000,000 old lei, the agricultural route with the compulsory quota delivered converts 375 stabilised lei immediately, five times the 75 stabilised lei available on the no-proof route.

Other counters in the law

The four windows summarise recurring ceilings in Article 8. Later articles used different rules for institutions, companies and special cases.

Public institutions
They could exchange every sum held, subject to verification in their books.
Associations and enterprises
Current-expense and working-capital ceilings started from payroll records. Enterprises ordinarily trading goods were excluded.
The rural family
Decision 17 included the husband, wife, minor children and unmarried adult children from the same household in the rural family. A wife or another member could register for an absent head; Article 8(e) separately provided proportional shares for unmarried adult children.
Special cases
People in certain institutions, barracked military personnel and farmers away from the family's locality had separate routes, often at the 1,500,000 old lei ceiling.
Accounts and instruments
Deposits, cheques, payment orders, savings books and other instruments entered the blocking regime. Some debts and statutory sums were recalculated directly at the fixed rate.

The rate says how much. The ceiling says who.

A monetary reform is usually summarised by the relationship between old and new money. In 1947, the 20,000-to-one rate described only the change of unit. Article 8 determined how much of a person's or household's money could immediately reach that rate.

For a stack of 10,000,000 old lei, the no-proof ceiling admitted 1,500,000. The routes in Article 8(a) and 8(c) admitted 3,000,000. Article 8(b), including its rural assimilations, opened the 5,000,000 ceiling. Proof that the compulsory grain quota had been delivered added another 2,500,000.

Proof that the compulsory grain quota was delivered opened another 125 stabilised lei.

That difference makes the reform visible as an administrative procedure. The list, document, domicile and household set the applicable ceiling. The rate stayed the same for the admitted amount.

The law's “old lei” included banknotes, coins and several forms of state paper. Deposits and payment instruments followed their own regime. This object tracks currency and paper presented for immediate exchange, then marks where blocking began.

The law, the list, the calculation

  1. S01
    Official Gazette no. 187, 16 August 1947

    The primary source for Law 287. Articles 6–8 appear on printed page 7343; the blocked-sum regime begins on page 7344.

  2. S02
    Official Gazette no. 268, 19 November 1947

    The typographical correction clarifies that Article 8(e) referred to unmarried adult children. The ceilings remain unchanged.

  3. S03
    Ministerial Decision no. 17, 11 August 1947

    Published in Official Gazette no. 183 on 12 August. It defines the lists, professional documents, rural family and registration on 12–14 August.

Method. For each route, the amount exchanged is the smaller of the chosen stack and the ceiling. The stabilised result is the admitted amount divided by 20,000. The remainder is the amount left outside immediate exchange. The 7,500,000 old lei ceiling is derived from 5,000,000 plus the conditional 2,500,000 increment. There is no hidden rounding.

Top