Children in controlENRO

Britain’s register of company controllers · snapshot of 31 October 2026

The children who control British companies

Most British companies must publish who ultimately owns or controls them, with each person’s month and year of birth. Of 14.0 million such records, 5,511 name a child under 16 at the time, and 10,982 a “newborn”. At the scale of the whole register they are too few to see: drag the glass along the ages.

A child

Age 4

279 records name a controller aged 4 when recorded: 271 different children. 45% share a surname with another adult who controls the same company. 46 are still listed as controlling a company that still exists.

Age here is the year of the record minus the year of birth, so a child shown as 4 was 3 or 4. A record is one entry: a person who controls three companies has three. Children are only counted on this page, never named.

The 10,982 newborns: mostly a wrong date in the birth box#

For every controller the register asks for two dates: when they were born and when they became a controller. The published data gives the month and year of birth. In 10,982 records the year of birth is the year the person became a controller. On paper, they controlled a company before their first birthday.

A real group of babies would include about as many one-month-olds as babies in their first month. The register has 6,297 records of people born in the very month they became controllers, 986 of people one month old, 104 at eleven months, and about 39 a month in the second and third years. Being recorded in your birth month is 6.4 times as common as being recorded a month later. Real babies do not arrive that way.

A second trace points the same way. In 38% of these records the same name appears again in the same company with an adult’s date of birth, usually the same person entered twice or corrected. Among adults aged 30 to 60 a name repeats like that in 3.7% of records. Counting the excess in the birth month and the twins born in other months, at least six in ten of the “newborns” are wrong dates of birth.

From 18 November 2025 every new controller had to verify their identity. The latest “newborn” before that has a controller date of 17 November 2025, and fewer than ten are dated after it. They had already become rare in 2024, after running at between 57 and 168 for every 100,000 new records each year from 2016 to 2023, then rose again just before the checks: 23 in September 2025, 39 in October and 22 in the first seventeen days of November. These are the dates people became controllers; when each record was filed is not published.

02,0004,0006,0000: 6,2971: 9862: 7613: 7304: 5755: 5166: 4407: 3418: 3079: 20110: 13811: 10412: 12613: 5014: 6515: 5016: 3517: 4118: 3119: 3720: 3321: 2722: 3523: 2124: 5125: 3326: 3627: 3628: 3229: 2930: 2631: 2032: 2933: 3134: 4035: 1936: 386,297986104061218243036age in months when recorded
Records aged 0 to 36 months when recorded, by month of age. Red: born in the very month they became controllers (6,297). Orange: the rest of the first year. A real population of children would be roughly level.
05010015020018 Nov 2025: identity checks2016-07: 179.62016-10: 222.72017-01: 80.22017-04: 90.72017-07: 129.82017-10: 149.42018-01: 64.82018-04: 104.82018-07: 88.82018-10: 140.92019-01: 76.92019-04: 112.02019-07: 128.72019-10: 160.22020-01: 148.92020-04: 173.12020-07: 159.12020-10: 190.32021-01: 109.72021-04: 90.82021-07: 67.82021-10: 97.02022-01: 29.72022-04: 52.62022-07: 65.92022-10: 85.92023-01: 29.42023-04: 41.72023-07: 93.32023-10: 96.42024-01: 19.32024-04: 4.82024-07: 4.12024-10: 14.02025-01: 2.42025-04: 2.82025-07: 11.52025-10: 23.92026-01: 0.02026-04: 0.02026-07: 0.0“newborns”20182020202220242026per 100,000 new records, by quarter
“Newborns” (age 0) per 100,000 new controller records, by quarter. They were common until 2023, rare from 2024, and from 18 November 2025 to the end of September 2026 none have a controller date in the period.

The children: 5,511 records that seldom show the signs of an error#

Leave the newborns aside and the register still holds 5,511 records of controllers under 16 when recorded: 5,288 different children in 4,734 companies. The largest age groups are 1 (708 records) and 15 (818). Another 200 were set aside because the child’s year of birth is also the year the company was founded, a sign of the company’s date typed into the birth field.

Overall 8% of these records have an adult twin; from the age of 4 it is 4.7%, against 3.7% among adults and 38% among the newborns. At ages 1 to 3 a twin turns up in 16% of records, so some of the youngest are still errors. The twin test only finds errors someone later corrected or filed twice; an error nobody touched would pass it.

Surnames point to families. Leaving out the person’s own second entry, 45% of child records share a surname with another adult controller of the same company (50% from age 4), against 19% of the newborn records.

Most of the children hold between a quarter and a half of the shares (3,479 records, including shares held as a trustee or through a firm); 1,329 hold more than three quarters.

AgeRecordsChildrenSame surname as another adultStill listed today
170870126%67
236635933%39
330829839%47
427927145%46
523923544%35
624523645%51
725324550%76
820720149%53
927026147%79
1028728055%72
1129629255%86
1233933449%82
1340338357%135
1449347253%149
1581878948%264
02004006008000%50%100%1: 70812: 36623: 30834: 27945: 23956: 24567: 25378: 20789: 270910: 2871011: 2961112: 3391213: 4031314: 4931415: 81815708818age when recorded
Records of children aged 1 to 15 when recorded (bars), and the share who have the same surname as another adult controller of the same company, the person’s own second entry left out (dots, right-hand scale).

What their companies do: property, three times as often as other companies#

Today 1,281 of these records are still current, in 1,073 companies that still exist. 681 belong to children born in 2011 or later, who are 15 or younger this year.

By the first trade code each company gives, letting property or buying and selling it is the business of 28% of these companies, against 9.5% of all 5.7 million live British companies. The register does not record why a child was given a share.

What the company does (first trade code)CompaniesShareShare of all live companies
Letting property it owns or leases18517%5%
Buying and selling its own property11911%5%
Other business support services404%3%
Holding other companies353%2%
Dormant company303%2%
Management consultancy293%4%
Other personal services262%2%
Developing building projects262%2%

After identity checks began, new child records fell by about three quarters#

From 18 November 2025, Companies House, the British register of companies, made identity verification “a compulsory part of incorporation and new appointments” for directors and controllers. A controller added after that date has 14 days from registration to verify.

In the twelve months to October 2025, children aged 1 to 15 made up about 49.6 of every 100,000 new records (35.9 to 60.9 a month). From December 2025 to September 2026 it was 13.1 (7.2 to 18.9), about a quarter of the earlier rate. The test and its threshold were fixed before the count: a fall to less than half, larger than any swing in the year before.

The controllers aged 90 and over are the comparison: they face the same checks but no barrier tied to age. Their rate stayed almost level, 21.7 per 100,000 before and 21.1 after.

A fall like this could be a delay, if records were filed late. Between two copies of the register thirteen days apart, 18 and 31 October 2026, the months from December 2025 gained 2.0 records per thousand and fewer than ten child records. That cannot rule out longer delays: November 2025 is still gaining records filed almost a year late.

0204060period tested18 Nov 2025: identity checks2016-07: 38.52016-10: 39.82017-01: 43.02017-04: 35.62017-07: 30.72017-10: 31.42018-01: 41.42018-04: 34.62018-07: 26.42018-10: 24.82019-01: 34.22019-04: 35.52019-07: 40.42019-10: 46.12020-01: 44.12020-04: 50.72020-07: 46.52020-10: 50.82021-01: 56.22021-04: 55.72021-07: 48.42021-10: 49.12022-01: 54.22022-04: 43.82022-07: 52.52022-10: 55.52023-01: 58.92023-04: 54.02023-07: 55.72023-10: 61.02024-01: 45.12024-04: 45.12024-07: 48.32024-10: 52.32025-01: 48.72025-04: 51.42025-07: 48.52025-10: 34.82026-01: 15.22026-04: 10.82026-07: 11.2children 1–152016-07: 31.52016-10: 42.12017-01: 28.82017-04: 41.42017-07: 54.32017-10: 44.42018-01: 45.52018-04: 45.12018-07: 9.12018-10: 21.12019-01: 22.52019-04: 19.72019-07: 17.42019-10: 14.02020-01: 19.42020-04: 20.12020-07: 15.42020-10: 27.52021-01: 17.12021-04: 24.32021-07: 14.92021-10: 18.32022-01: 15.42022-04: 19.02022-07: 20.72022-10: 15.82023-01: 15.52023-04: 24.92023-07: 17.82023-10: 16.32024-01: 19.32024-04: 10.92024-07: 20.42024-10: 25.02025-01: 22.02025-04: 23.12025-07: 21.02025-10: 15.32026-01: 23.02026-04: 21.12026-07: 20.1aged 90+20182020202220242026per 100,000 new records, by quarter
Of every 100,000 new controller records each quarter: children aged 1 to 15 (orange) and people aged 90 and over (grey), the comparison group. Shaded: the period of the test fixed in advance. Last point: July to September 2026.

Why fewer children: what is known and what is not#

The Companies House pages that explain the checks do not mention a minimum age. The law sets one for directors: under the Companies Act 2006, a director must be at least 16. Controllers, who usually own shares rather than run the company, are outside that rule.

The checks run through GOV.UK One Login, the government’s sign-in service, or through an authorised agent. One Login’s design notes say that children under 17 “are likely to struggle”: without a credit history they cannot answer its security questions. The notes do not rule out its other ways of proving identity.

A child may find the checks hard to pass, an agent may decline to verify one, or a family may decide a child’s share is not worth the trouble. The register cannot tell these apart, and the fall is shown here as something that happened after the checks began, not as their proven effect. Controllers already listed before 18 November 2025 are being checked over twelve months; the children still listed today have to verify too.

Where the children live#

By the country of residence on the register, most of the children live in England; many records give only “United Kingdom”. Some live abroad, the largest groups in Germany and France.

Country of residenceRecords
England3,233
United Kingdom (no country given)1,507
Scotland233
Wales119
Northern Ireland56
Germany24
France17
Czech Republic16

How the numbers were made#

Data. Companies House’s free copy of the register of people with significant control, dated 31 October 2026: 14,019,954 records of individual people with a year of birth and a date they became a controller (companies that control companies are left out). Trade codes and founding dates come from Companies House’s list of live companies of 1 October 2026, so dissolved companies, and companies founded since, have none; the founding-year filter could only be applied to live companies.

Ages and people. Age is the year of the record minus the year of birth. Different people are counted by name and month and year of birth. Names were turned into one-way codes as the file was read and were never stored, and no count under 10 is shown. Dates are the dates people became controllers; the date each record was filed is not published.

Tests. Each test was written down before the count. The first surname test (at least half of child records sharing a surname with an adult co-controller) came out “mixed” at 49.9%, just short; it counted the person’s own second entry as a match, which the page’s figures now leave out. The twin test: another record in the same company with the same first name and surname, aged 16 or more at its own date. A father and son with the same name would also count. Rates per 100,000 use all 5,711 records aged 1 to 15, including the 200 set aside. A sample of 221,354 records of adults aged 30 to 60 gives the adult rate.

Earlier work. In 2018 Global Witness, an anti-corruption group, found impossible dates of birth on the register, including a person not yet born.

Licence. Companies House says it imposes no rules or requirements on how the information on the public register is used. The figures here are counts from that register; the register itself is Companies House’s.

Sources#