The brain by ultrasoundROEN
Navigation · pre-op MRI
Ultrasound
Probe

Drag on the brain: move the probe · hold the right button: turn the head

Loading the patient’s images

Neurosurgery · gliomas

The brain seen by ultrasound: the tumour is not where the navigation screen puts it

In brain surgery, the navigation screen shows where an instrument’s tip is on an MRI taken before the operation. Once the skull is open, ultrasound shows the brain as it is at that moment. In 22 patients operated on for gliomas at St Olavs Hospital in Trondheim, Norway, the distance between where the same anatomical landmark appears on the MRI and on the ultrasound averaged 3.5 mm for the patient in the middle of the group and 19.7 mm for this one 1.

The probe is in your hand ↓

What the navigation screen shows

Before the operation the patient has an MRI. In theatre the head is fixed in a frame and a camera tracks the instruments, whose tip appears on the screen inside the scan. To make screen and head agree, the image is aligned to markers on the head; for the Trondheim patients, five markers were glued on before the MRI 1.

On the left of the monitor is what navigation sees in the plane under the probe: the FLAIR MRI, in which the glioma shows white. The gold outline, traced with an intensity threshold, follows that white area. Grade 2 gliomas like this one grow slowly and spread into the brain without a clean edge.

What the ultrasound sees in the same place

On the right is the 3D ultrasound taken through the craniotomy, usually before the dura was opened 1. The image is a slice through the volume recorded at the time, on exactly the same plane as the MRI. The glioma shows brighter than the brain around it, and the white lines are mostly the grooves between folds.

The gold outline is placed on the ultrasound at the same coordinates. The bright tumour sits beside it. The database’s authors marked the same anatomical points on the MRI and on the ultrasound: in this patient the two points of each of the 16 pairs are 19.7 mm apart on average. Gold rings are the points on the MRI, blue dots the same landmarks on the ultrasound; those within 4 mm of the plane are shown.

Move the probe

Drag the probe across the brain to move the plane; the ⟲ ⟳ buttons or the Q and E keys rotate it. Hold the right button and drag to turn the head, or use the corner buttons to turn it step by step. On a phone, drag a finger across the monitor images to move the probe. The ultrasound only covers what the recorded sweep covered; outside it the image is black.

The landmarks do not all move the same way: the brain deforms. On the navigation screen the gap combines an imperfect alignment at the start of surgery with the brain’s movement since the MRI was taken; brain shift is what makes navigation unreliable as the operation goes on 5.

In the typical patient, 3.3 mm

This patient is close to the middle of the group: the two points of each of the 16 landmark pairs are 3.3 mm apart on average. The median across the 22 patients is 3.5 mm. In 8 of them the average gap is more than 5 mm; in 3, more than a centimetre 1.

On the ultrasound, the glioma next to the gold outline is the same one, only moved. When a tumour lies close to areas that control movement or speech, a few millimetres separate what can be removed from what must be left.

During the resection

Ultrasound is repeated during the resection and at the end. The buttons below step through the three volumes recorded for this patient. Where the tumour was, a cavity opens, and the tissue around it settles differently.

Compared with the first ultrasound, in 17 patients the landmarks had moved by 3.46 mm on average during the resection and by 3.55 mm at the end; in this patient by 2.4 and 2.0 mm 1. The two averages are almost equal, though patients differ: in one of them the distance grew from 3.6 mm during the resection to 7.6 mm at the end.

Where would you stop?

Another hospital: Brigham and Women’s in Boston, which published 114 brain operations with their 3D ultrasound and an MRI taken in theatre during surgery 3. This is a glioblastoma in the left temporal lobe, in an area classed as eloquent, meaning important for functions such as speech or movement. The gold outline is the tumour as the authors drew it on the pre-operative MRI: 28.5 mL. On the right is the ultrasound taken after the dura was opened.

Click and drag on the ultrasound to colour what you would remove. You can move and rotate the probe to work in other planes; each stroke is a 5 mm sphere. The ↶ button on the image or the Backspace key undoes the last stroke.

The MRI in theatre

When the surgeon judged the resection finished, an MRI was taken in theatre. The button below puts it on the left, on the same plane: the cavity is the dark area and the red outline is the tumour left behind, as the authors drew it, 2.8 mL. On the right is the last ultrasound, taken just before that MRI.

According to the clinical data, the resection did not continue after this MRI, and 1 to 5 mL of tumour remained after surgery 3. Near eloquent areas, part of a tumour is sometimes left on purpose; the data do not say why it was left here. The ultrasound was brought into the MRI’s coordinates only roughly, and the brain can also move between the ultrasound and the MRI in theatre, so the overlap with your strokes is approximate.

  • tumour on the pre-operative MRI
  • tumour left, on the MRI in theatre
  • what you coloured

22 patients, at the same scale

Each square is one Trondheim patient, seen from above the head. Each blue line starts at the gold ring in the centre, where a landmark sits on the MRI, and ends where the same landmark sits on the first ultrasound; the thin circles are at 5 and 10 mm, and red lines mark the patients whose average exceeds a centimetre. Patients are ordered by the average distance between pairs; the two framed ones are in the simulator. The database’s 23rd patient has no pairs between the MRI and the first ultrasound.

The median is 3.5 mm, the mean 5.4 mm, and the extremes are 1.1 and 19.7 mm. On the same data, the database’s authors reported the same values 1.

MRIfirst ultrasound

In Romania

This page also has a Romanian edition, for readers in Romania. By GLOBOCAN’s estimates, Romania had 1,886 new cases of cancer of the brain and central nervous system in 2024, and 1,646 deaths from them 6. Not all are gliomas, the tumours in the examples above.

Romanian hospitals use neuronavigation and theatre ultrasound too. In 2015, a group of Romanian neurosurgeons described in the journal Romanian Neurosurgery how 3D ultrasound built into navigation corrects for the brain shift that follows opening the dura and finds tumour remnants, noting that intraoperative MRI is out of reach for many neurosurgical departments 7. A 2025 study from the Central Military Emergency University Hospital in Bucharest, Romania’s capital, compared 19 glioma operations done with intraoperative ultrasound with 19 done without: with ultrasound, the tumour was removed completely in 47.4% of patients, against 10.5% without; the authors caution that the groups are small and the study covered a single centre 8.

How it was made, and what it is not

The Trondheim patients. The RESECT database (CC BY 4.0 licence) holds, for 23 adults operated on between 2011 and 2016 at St Olavs Hospital for grade 2 gliomas, the pre-operative MRI (T1 and FLAIR) and 3D ultrasound recorded by the navigation system before, during and after resection, in the same coordinates as the MRI 1 2. Pairs of anatomical landmarks (sulci, ventricle edges, other structures recognisable on both images) were marked by the authors. The distances on this page are recomputed from the published files: for each patient, the mean distance between pairs; then the mean, median and extremes of those means.

What is real and what is computed. The ultrasound images are slices through the recorded volumes, resampled at 0.6 mm; nothing in them is generated. The probe can only move over the surface the sweep was recorded from, and a slice in a plane far from the original sweep is blurrier. For the Trondheim patients, the gold outline is traced by an intensity threshold on the FLAIR image, chosen for each patient, not by a doctor. The head in the 3D view is rendered from the T1 MRI; the craniotomy is a cylinder opened above the swept area, not the real shape of the operation.

The Boston patient. The ReMIND database (CC BY 4.0 licence) holds 114 brain operations done between 2018 and 2022 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital; for some of them it has 3D ultrasound before and after opening the dura and before the MRI in theatre, the MRI in theatre itself, and the tumour and the tumour left behind as drawn by the authors 3 4. The patient here has all of them. The ultrasound was tracked by the navigation system and brought roughly into the coordinates of the pre-operative MRI; the MRI in theatre was registered automatically to the pre-operative one. The volumes of the tumour (28.5 mL) and of the remnant (2.8 mL) are computed from those outlines; the “1–5 mL” category comes from the database’s clinical table.

What it is not. It is not a planning tool and it does not replace examining a patient. The landmark distances describe 22 patients from one hospital, operated on with one navigation system; they cannot be generalised to other hospitals or other tumours. Your coloured strokes are not scored as right or wrong: they only show where they lie relative to what the MRI in theatre found.

Same series: The liver seen by ultrasound.

Sources

  1. Xiao Y, Fortin M, Unsgård G, Rivaz H, Reinertsen I. REtroSpective Evaluation of Cerebral Tumors (RESECT): a clinical database of pre-operative MRI and intra-operative ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgeries. Medical Physics 2017;44:3875–3882. doi.org/10.1002/mp.12268
  2. Xiao Y, Fortin M, Unsgård G, Rivaz H, Reinertsen I. RESECT: a clinical database of pre-operative MRI and intra-operative ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgeries [dataset]. NIRD Research Data Archive, 2017. CC BY 4.0. doi.org/10.11582/2017.00004
  3. Juvekar P, Dorent R, Kögl F, et al. ReMIND: The Brain Resection Multimodal Imaging Database. Scientific Data 2024;11:494. doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03295-z
  4. ReMIND (The Cancer Imaging Archive), 2023. CC BY 4.0. doi.org/10.7937/3RAG-D070
  5. Gerard IJ, Kersten-Oertel M, Hall JA, Sirhan D, Collins DL. Brain shift in neuronavigation of brain tumors: an updated review of intra-operative ultrasound applications. Frontiers in Oncology 2021;10:618837. doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.618837
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory: Romania, fact sheet, GLOBOCAN 2024. gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/642-romania-fact-sheet.pdf
  7. Giovani A, Brehar F, Bucur N, Martin D, Gorgan RM. Intraoperative neuronavigation integrated high resolution 3D ultrasound for brainshift and tumor resection control. Romanian Neurosurgery 2015:141–149. journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/818
  8. Sirbu OM, Chirtes AV, Eftimie LG, Plesa A, Mitrica M, Gorgan MR. Improving glioma resection with 2D-intraoperative ultrasound: observational results and systematic literature correlation. Surgical Neurology International 2025;16:503. doi.org/10.25259/SNI_823_2025