BIRTH ORDER, TESTED

Four in Ten

Popular theory says the firstborn leads and the youngest rebels. Three studies, covering over 400,000 people, find almost nothing: on intelligence, the gap is so small that in four of ten families, the younger sibling is still the smarter one.

See the evidence
Pencil marks on a doorframe, like a children's growth chart, with the first and second child's lines nearly overlapping A B
1996 · the theory2015 · the test
6,000 historical figures analyzed by the popular theory Frank Sulloway's book, Born to Rebel, 1996
20,000+ people from Germany, the US and the UK zero effect on four of five personality traits (Rohrer, Egloff & Schmukle, 2015)
377,000 US high schoolers, a representative sample correlation of 0.02 with personality, 0.04 with intelligence (Damian & Roberts, 2015)
4 in 10 families where the younger sibling is smarter even with the firstborn's average advantage factored in

THE THEORY AND ITS REBUTTAL

A 1996 theory, tested on 400,000 people

In 1996, psychologist Frank Sulloway published Born to Rebel, a historical analysis of nearly 6,000 figures and half a million biographical data points. His conclusion: firstborns defend the status quo, are conscientious and dominant, while laterborns reject authority, stay open to new ideas, and are more agreeable. In the book, the theory explained the Protestant Reformation, the French Revolution, and resistance to Darwin's theory. source: Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives

Twenty years later, Julia Rohrer, Boris Egloff and Stefan Schmukle tested the theory on over 20,000 people from three national panels, in Germany, the United States and Britain. The result: no trace of an effect on four of the five major personality traits, extraversion, emotional stability, agreeableness and conscientiousness. The only real effect, though small, showed up on intelligence. source: Examining the effects of birth order on personality

Rodica Damian and Brent Roberts confirmed the result on an even larger sample: 377,000 US high schoolers. The correlation between birth order and personality was 0.02. With intelligence, 0.04. Both are so small they explain under one percent of the real differences between people. source: The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students

The firstborn's average intelligence edge is real, but tiny. Stefan Schmukle summed up how tiny: in four of ten families, the younger sibling is still smarter than the older one. source: Examining the effects of birth order on personality

PLAY, DON'T TAKE IT ON FAITH

Guess who's firstborn

Below are the conscientiousness scores of two siblings, generated live from a distribution calibrated to the real correlation measured across 377,000 people. Pick who you think is firstborn. Play a few rounds and watch your own score.

Sibling A

Sibling B

0rounds played
0correct guesses
your rate

Guessing with a coin flip, you'd be right half the time. The more you play, the closer your score drifts to that 50%, not away from it.

Scores are generated live from a pair of values calibrated to the real correlation between birth order and intelligence, r = 0.04 (Damian & Roberts, 2015). This is not data about real people. source: The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students

WHAT'S STILL REAL

The small effect isn't invented

The intelligence gap, though small, is real and repeats across several large samples. The best-supported explanation is about resources: parents have more time, attention and means for a first child, before the family grows.

The studies cited here come from Germany, the US and Britain, wealthy countries with relatively small families. In a family with eight children, or in a subsistence economy, parental resources split differently, and the effect could look different.

A 0.02 correlation on personality means birth order explains under a hundredth of a percent of the real variation between people. The rest, almost the entire difference, comes from somewhere else: genes, friends, teachers, chance.

ONE MORE THING

A question to carry forward

Next time someone describes themselves as "a typical youngest" or "a typical firstborn," ask how sure they are, and remember that in the game, you guessed right about as often as a coin flip would.

See the sources

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sources

Every figure on this page comes from a citable source, verified directly or through at least two independent citations when the primary text was inaccessible.

Verified 25 August 2026.

01
Carte · Book

Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives

Pantheon Books, 1996. Nearly 6,000 historical figures, half a million biographical data points.

source ↗
02
Studiu · Study

Examining the effects of birth order on personality

PNAS, 112(46), 14224–14229 (2015). Over 20,000 people from Germany, the US and the UK.

source ↗
03
Studiu · Study

The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students

Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 96–105 (2015). 377,000 US high school students, the Project Talent sample.

source ↗
Top