Marius ComperProbability notebooks
Română

Constanța · summers of 1961–2025

Rain after
a dry month

At Constanța, after 30 days without rain above 5 mm per day, the threshold was exceeded within the next 7 days in 12 of 64 summer episodes. Explore the record and compare stations.

Constanța · June–August · 1961–2025

19%in the next 7 days12 / 64
44%in the next 14 days28 / 64
Rain above 5 mm in a day, after 30 consecutive days with at most 5 mm per day. The same 64 episodes in both calculations. Source: NOAA GHCN-Daily · original calculations

A “dry” month can include light rain. Here we follow gaps between days with rain above 5 mm; agricultural drought also depends on water in the soil.

Historical observations. For the coming days, consult a weather forecast.

Historical calculator

When did rain return at your chosen station?

Choose a station and the months you want to examine. To compare earlier and more recent summers, change the observation period.

Historical calculator
Look for rain within the next
Change observation years and rain threshold

The initial threshold, above 5 mm in a day, follows Praying for Rain. Days with rain at or below the threshold count towards the “dry” spell. In colder months, precipitation includes the water equivalent of snow.

Constanța · 1961–2025 · Summer · June–August

18.8%

with precipitation above 5 mm in the next 7 days

12 out of 64 observed episodes, 51 years.

95% uncertainty interval: 10.5% – 27.8%

The same episodes, four waiting periods

1 day1.6%1 / 64
7 days18.8%12 / 64
14 days43.8%28 / 64
28 days70.3%45 / 64
Compare with usual rainfall frequency

Reference for the same calendar months 31.5%Result − reference-12.7 pp · 95%: -21.1 … -3.6 pp

Reference for the same month and year 14.3%Result − reference+4.5 pp · 95%: -2.8 … +12.3 pp

The first reference uses the same calendar months across all years in the period. The second also keeps each episode’s year. Frequencies are weighted to match the selected episodes, regardless of the preceding dry duration. The difference shows how the choice of comparison matters; neither reference measures an effect of prayer.

Full method, definitions and limitations

Does a longer dry spell raise tomorrow’s chance?

Here the waiting period stays at one day. The chart compares episodes that reached different dry durations. Bars show uncertainty; gaps without points have too few observations.

Daily precipitation probability at different durations below the threshold, with uncertainty intervals.0%5%10%15%20%014306090Probability in the next dayDays without exceeding the threshold
At 0, the starting day has precipitation above the threshold. Intervals are approximate and apply to each point separately. An upward curve would describe the archive without establishing an effect of waiting on the weather.
Read the curve values and denominators
DurationEpisodesProbability95% uncertainty interval
049 / 36813.3%9.8% – 16.9%
317 / 2756.2%3.1% – 9.4%
711 / 2095.3%2.7% – 7.9%
145 / 1423.5%0.7% – 6.8%
214 / 904.4%1.1% – 8.8%
301 / 641.6%0.0% – 5.3%
450 / 310.0%not estimated
600 / 11not estimatednot estimated
900 / 3not estimatednot estimated

A longer wait gives rain more chances to arrive.

In the Constanța example, rain above 5 mm arrived in 12 of 64 episodes within one week and in 28 of 64 within two weeks. This increase does not imply that each day’s chance rose as the dry spell lengthened. The chart above lets you examine that separate question.

In the Constanța record

The summers behind the percentage

Each row marks the day when a spell reached 30 consecutive days without precipitation above 5 mm. These are all 64 episodes with that date in June–August, during 1961–2025. The six most recent appear below; the complete list includes episodes with no day above the threshold in the following 28 days.

Across these 30-day windows, total precipitation ranged from 0 to 25.3 mm. Half the windows had at most 4.6 mm. Only one window had no precipitation at all.

At 30 dry daysNext rain >5 mmAfter another
2025-09-139.2 mm27 days
None within 28 days
2024-07-2616.9 mm20 days
2024-06-0618 mm4 days
None within 28 days
2023-07-046 mm26 days
See all 64 episodes in chronological order
At 30 dry daysPrevious rain >5 mmNext rain >5 mmAfter another
1961-06-16None within 28 days
1962-05-12None within 28 days
1963-07-041963-08-1020.8 mm7 days
1965-05-151965-07-1144.4 mm27 days
1965-07-141965-08-166.7 mm3 days
1966-07-031966-08-127.8 mm10 days
1970-05-251970-07-188.6 mm24 days
1970-07-181970-08-235.5 mm6 days
1971-05-311971-07-0210.6 mm2 days
1971-07-02None within 28 days
1973-07-261973-09-115.1 mm17 days
1974-07-081974-08-1215.2 mm5 days
1975-07-09None within 28 days
1976-06-081976-07-1711.5 mm9 days
1977-07-041977-08-2527.8 mm22 days
1979-05-131979-06-246.9 mm12 days
1981-05-091981-06-2523.5 mm17 days
1981-07-011981-08-235.3 mm23 days
1984-05-141984-06-256.9 mm12 days
1985-06-301985-08-037 mm4 days
1986-07-18None within 28 days
1988-07-121988-09-078 mm27 days
1989-07-191989-09-0517.4 mm18 days
1990-06-25None within 28 days
1992-05-131992-07-019.9 mm19 days
1992-07-19None within 28 days
1993-07-131993-08-2913.6 mm17 days
1994-07-121994-08-2414.9 mm13 days
1995-05-211995-06-2620.8 mm6 days
1995-06-28None within 28 days
1996-05-231996-07-1719.3 mm25 days
1996-07-261996-09-076.3 mm13 days
1998-07-171998-08-236.5 mm7 days
1999-07-031999-08-0345.9 mm1 day
2000-06-27None within 28 days
2001-06-21None within 28 days
2002-06-042002-07-216.9 mm17 days
2003-07-312003-09-1128.8 mm12 days
2005-07-16None within 28 days
2006-07-012006-08-1115.8 mm11 days
2007-06-282007-08-0734.4 mm10 days
2008-05-122008-06-1933.2 mm8 days
2008-07-162008-09-0912 mm25 days
2009-05-312009-07-1028.8 mm10 days
2009-07-262009-09-0615.6 mm12 days
2010-05-212010-06-2213.6 mm2 days
2010-07-28None within 28 days
2011-07-21None within 28 days
2012-05-29None within 28 days
2014-06-262014-08-1796.4 mm22 days
2015-05-272015-07-0520 mm9 days
2016-06-14None within 28 days
2017-07-282017-08-2913.4 mm2 days
2018-07-29None within 28 days
2019-05-222019-07-0318.2 mm12 days
2020-07-082020-08-217.2 mm14 days
2021-07-07None within 28 days
2022-06-092022-07-1710.6 mm8 days
2023-05-092023-07-046 mm26 days
2023-07-28None within 28 days
2024-05-032024-06-0618 mm4 days
2024-06-062024-07-2616.9 mm20 days
2025-05-17None within 28 days
2025-07-182025-09-139.2 mm27 days

This is the fixed Constanța example from the opening. Season applies to the date when the 30-day duration was reached; later rain may fall in September. Missing observations are never counted as dry days.

Download the episode list · JSON ↓

Observations in Romania

Compare stations under the same conditions.

The question stays fixed: after 30 days with at most 5 mm per day, did a day above the threshold occur in the next 7 days? Starting dates are in June–August, during 1961–2025.

Location of the 23 eligible Romanian stationsAradBacăuBotoșaniBucurești BăneasaBăneasaBuzăuCaransebeșCeahlău ToacaCluj-NapocaCluj-NapocaConstanțaConstanțaCraiovaCraiovaCălărașiDevaDrobeta-Turnu SeverinGalațiIașiIașiMiercurea CiucOcna ȘugatagRoșiori de VedeRâmnicu VâlceaSibiuSulinaSulinaTulceaVârful Omu
Weather station · GHCN-Daily / NOAA
Natural Earth · 1:110m
Constanța18.8%12 out of 64 episodes
Roșiori de Vede33.3%13 out of 39 episodes

The range above covers stations with enough episodes. Băneasa has only 28, so its percentage is withheld. Stations describe measurement sites; their values do not form a probability for the whole country.

See results and episode counts at all 23 stations
Weather stationProbabilityEpisodes95% uncertainty interval
Aradnot estimated14 / 27not estimated
Bacăunot estimated9 / 18not estimated
Botoșaninot estimated4 / 10not estimated
București Băneasanot estimated14 / 28not estimated
Buzăunot estimated10 / 21not estimated
Caransebeșnot estimated9 / 12not estimated
Ceahlău Toacanot estimated1 / 2not estimated
Cluj-Napocanot estimated6 / 13not estimated
Constanța18.8%12 / 6410.5% – 27.8%
Craiova30.0%9 / 3013.5% – 47.6%
Călărași32.4%11 / 3414.3% – 50.0%
Devanot estimated17 / 23not estimated
Drobeta-Turnu Severin33.3%13 / 3918.2% – 48.7%
Galați28.6%12 / 4215.9% – 43.2%
Iașinot estimated18 / 28not estimated
Miercurea Ciucnot estimated3 / 6not estimated
Ocna Șugatagnot estimated4 / 7not estimated
Roșiori de Vede33.3%13 / 3917.9% – 48.4%
Râmnicu Vâlceanot estimated7 / 14not estimated
Sibiunot estimated6 / 15not estimated
Sulina23.0%17 / 7413.6% – 32.5%
Tulcea25.9%14 / 5413.0% – 38.1%
Vârful Omunot estimated1 / 2not estimated

Which places are covered?

Of the 30 Romanian precipitation stations in NOAA’s inventory, 23 have sufficient coverage in 1961–2025. That does not guarantee enough episodes for every duration and season. The map shows stations, without delimiting drought-affected areas.

Inspect annual coverage and exclusions

Rain and ritual

When weather can seem to answer a prayer

Anthropologist Radu Umbreș’s post about Praying for Rain prompted this analysis. The study asks when weather conditions can sustain belief in the effectiveness of rainmaking rituals. Read Radu Umbreș’s post ↗

Espín-Sánchez, Gil-Guirado and Ryan examine prayers in Murcia and practices recorded in ethnographic sources worldwide. In the raw comparison in Appendix D11, rainmaking is recorded for 44% of groups where estimated daily probability rises after very long dry intervals, compared with 30% in the comparison group.

That increase concerns the end of a fitted curve, near the local 99th percentile of intervals between wet days. It does not mean that every dry day brings a higher probability. The Romanian calculator shows observed frequencies and their uncertainty; it does not reproduce the paper’s model or cultural analysis.

QJE article and appendices ↗

What we can say about Romania

Romania’s national inventory of intangible cultural heritage documents Caloian and Paparuda. Dated Orthodox rain processions are also recorded, for example at Suceava on 9 August 2015. These sources attest to practices with different histories; weather records alone cannot explain why people took part or whether a ritual had any effect.

A test of the social hypothesis would need dates and locations of rituals, including those not followed by rain, and a definition of “success” settled before making the comparison.

How the Romanian connection could be studied ↓

Open method

How episodes are counted

We divide episodes followed by at least one day above the threshold by all eligible episodes. All four waiting periods use the same cases, with 28 complete days of subsequent observations. Each episode’s history starts at a known day above the threshold.

Uncertainty intervals come from resampling calendar years 1,000 times. They are approximate and do not include every source of error. Percentages require at least 30 episodes across 10 years; counts remain visible below that threshold.

Full method, definitions and limitations ↗

Download the data and code

Synthetic review and numerical checks ↗

NOAA data are public; retain source attribution. This project's calculations and text are available under CC BY 4.0.