Sepsis without feverROEN

Intensive care · 40,335 real admissions · two hospitals

Sepsis without a fever: 2,506 real intensive-care charts, hour by hour, before sepsis was dated

Nearly two in three patients with sepsis had no temperature of 38 °C or more on their chart in the 12 hours before sepsis was dated. Follow the chart hour by hour, as at the bedside, and decide whether and when to raise the alarm.

Temperature—
Pulse—
Breathing—
Systolic pressure—
O₂ saturation—

How it works. A round has 8 real patients: 4 developed sepsis, 4 did not (in the full data, 7.3% did). You see only vital signs: temperature, pulse, breathing rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. The lab tests, blood cultures and antibiotics from which sepsis was dated are not shown. If the patient developed sepsis, the dated moment is at most 2 hours before the chart ends, because that is where the data cut the charts.

Scoring. +1 for an alarm on a patient who developed sepsis, raised between 12 hours before the dated moment and the end of the chart; 0 for an earlier alarm (the challenge these data come from gave such early alarms no reward either, and docked them slightly) or for no alarm; −1 for an alarm on a patient who did not develop sepsis.

Your result

You have not followed a chart to the end yet.

Each patient’s highest temperature in the 12 hours before sepsis

Above, each dot is one of the 2,445 patients who developed sepsis and had at least one temperature charted in those hours: the highest value charted from 12 hours before the dated moment up to it. Below, for comparison, one patient from the same hospital who did not develop sepsis, in intensive care at the same hours since admission.

Developed sepsis · 2,445 · 65.4% no 38 °CNo sepsis (same hours)≥ 38 °CYour patients
Tap a dot to open that patient’s chart.

In hospital A, 64.8% of 1,535 patients had no reading of 38 °C or more; in hospital B, 66.4% of 910. A charted fever was more common in those with sepsis than in the others (35.2% against 21.1% in A, 33.6% against 11.4% in B), but most of those with sepsis had none charted. A normal temperature is no reassurance: 15.8% (A) and 18.0% (B) of them had a reading below 36 °C, also a warning sign.

Temperature was taken rarely: the median is 3 readings across the 13 hours of the window, from 12 hours before up to the dated hour. Between two readings the chart says nothing, and several readings in one hour appear in the data as their median, so a short fever may have gone uncharted. For 3.3% (A) and 1.0% (B) of the patients with sepsis no temperature was charted in those hours; they are left out of the percentages.

In short, by hospital
Patients with sepsis, moment pinned down1,587 (A) · 919 (B)
No temperature ≥ 38 °C in the 12 hours before64.8% of 1,535 · 66.4% of 910
No temperature charted in those hours (left out of the percentages)3.3% · 1.0%
Temperature readings in the window (median)3 · 3
At least one reading below 36 °C15.8% · 18.0%
Patients without sepsis, same hours, with a reading ≥ 38 °C21.1% · 11.4%
At the dated hour: pulse ≤ 90 and temperature 36–38 °C37.7% · 34.1%
At the dated hour: breathing ≥ 22 (sepsis / no sepsis)41.4% / 36.8% · 36.6% / 26.3%

What a simple rule catches, and how many false alarms it raises

Over a window of about 15 hours (from 12 hours before the dated moment to the end of the chart), for 2,491 patients with sepsis and 2,504 without, at the same hours of their stay: how many each rule would have raised the alarm for at least once.

00252550507575100100Without sepsis: rule raises the alarm (%)With sepsis: rule raises the alarm (%)123456Alarm for everyoneAlarm for no oneTemperature ≥ 38 °C
RuleWith sepsis: rule raises the alarmWithout sepsis: rule raises the alarm
1Temperature ≥ 38 °C37.2%18.0%
2Temperature ≥ 38 °C or below 36 °C53.5%36.0%
3Pulse above 9073.9%57.9%
4Breathing ≥ 22 a minute74.5%70.4%
5Systolic pressure ≤ 10052.5%40.0%
6Two of three: abnormal temperature, pulse above 90, breathing ≥ 2268.6%53.7%

Picture 1,000 patients like these, 73 of whom develop sepsis. The rule “temperature ≥ 38 °C”, applied over that window, would raise the alarm for 27 of the 73 and, over the same hours, for 167 of the 927 who do not develop sepsis. Over a whole stay there would be more false alarms still. A pulse above 90 would flag 74% of the patients with sepsis, but also 58% of the others.

No single vital sign on its own separates the two groups well. The sepsis moment was dated from lab tests and from the team’s decisions, blood cultures and antibiotics, which the chart here does not show.

What “the moment sepsis was dated” means

The moment is neither the start of the illness nor the minute a doctor made the diagnosis. The organisers of the 2019 PhysioNet challenge computed it with the Sepsis-3 criteria3: the earlier of two moments. One is suspicion of infection: blood cultures taken and intravenous antibiotics given within a short interval of each other, with the antibiotics continued for at least three days. The other is a rise of at least two points in the SOFA score, which measures how badly the organs are affected, from 24 hours before the suspicion to 12 hours after2. The three-day antibiotic condition uses information from later on, so the moment was not known at the bedside at the time.

The charts in the data stop a few hours after that moment (median: 3 hours), which is why this page looks at the hours before. For 426 patients the sepsis label was already on at their first recorded hour, so the moment cannot be pinned down; they are left out.

What the data cannot say: whether patients were given fever-lowering drugs or cooled down, why they had no fever, or what sepsis looks like at home. These are people already in intensive care.

What other studies found

The finding is not new. A study of 5,532 patients diagnosed with sepsis in the emergency department, from the MIMIC-IV database of Beth Israel Deaconess in Boston, sorted the course of their temperature into four patterns. The largest group, 74.1%, followed a normal-temperature pattern. The smallest, 0.9% with a low temperature, had the highest death rate: 37.5%4.

In the emergency department of the same hospital, 45% of patients with septic shock had no fever (neither reported nor measured above 38 °C). They were given antibiotics in the department less often (81% against 94%) and died in hospital more often (33% against 11%)5. That does not prove the missing fever caused the difference, but it shows why it matters.

Both studies come from Beth Israel Deaconess, which is hospital A in the data here. The independent check is hospital B, Emory in Atlanta, where the share is almost the same.

At home: the signs are not only fever

The data above come from intensive care and do not describe what sepsis looks like at home. Guidance does. The NHS lists these signs in adults: confusion or slurred speech, uncontrollable shivering, muscle pain, difficulty breathing, blue, pale, grey or blotchy skin, lips or tongue, a high or low temperature (a high temperature is less common in older adults), and not peeing all day or very little in the past 18 hours6. Someone may not have every sign.

If you think someone may have sepsis, call 999 (in the UK; 112 across Europe) or go to the emergency department now. The game above takes points for false alarms to show what a rule that goes off for everyone costs. At home it is the other way round: when in doubt, get help.

The guide for patients and families Sepsis Clarity explains the warning signs, what to ask in hospital and what recovery looks like.

In Romania: how many people die of infections (pneumonia, sepsis, C. difficile) and how that compares with the rest of the EU.

Method and sources

The data: the training set of the 2019 PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology challenge1, 40,335 intensive-care admissions from two hospitals: A (20,335, Beth Israel Deaconess) and B (20,000, Emory)2. The organisers report 40,336 admissions; the published archive has one fewer in hospital A. Each hour holds the vital signs charted in that hour (their median, if there were several); hours without a reading are empty. 2,932 patients developed sepsis (7.3%); for 2,506 the moment can be pinned down.

The sepsis moment is the hour of the first sepsis label plus 6 hours, because the organisers labelled patients 6 hours early. Every window is counted in hours since admission to intensive care, not in rows of the file: 8,793 charts begin after the first hour.

The test’s bar was written down on 3 November 2026, before counting: at least 40% without fever in both hospitals. The window registered then, from 6 hours before to 6 hours after, gives the same answer: 65.0% (A) and 64.5% (B). A second test, looking for the vital sign that changes first, failed: the clearest difference between the groups was in a different sign in each hospital (pulse in A, temperature in B), appeared only in the last few hours and was weak.

The patient without sepsis set beside each patient with sepsis is drawn by a lottery that can be repeated exactly, from those in intensive care at the same hours since admission, in the same hospital. The 24 charts in the rounds were drawn the same way, by a rule fixed before looking at them: in each hospital, 4 patients with sepsis and no charted fever and 2 with one (the proportion in the data), each with a patient without sepsis from the same hours. Drawn charts have at least 12 hours before the dated moment, a temperature in the last 12 and a pulse charted in at least 60% of the hours.

Every number on the page is recomputed from the data on each release.

Sources

  1. Reyna MA, Josef C, Seyedi S et al. Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019. Data: PhysioNet, version 1.0.0, CC BY 4.0 licence. physionet.org/content/challenge-2019/1.0.0/
  2. Reyna MA et al. Critical Care Medicine 2020;48(2):210–217 (how the sepsis time was set, the hospitals, the challenge scoring). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6964870/
  3. Singer M et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315(8):801–810. jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2492881
  4. Kijpaisalratana N et al. Exploring temperature trajectories in emergency department sepsis patients. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2025;95:235–242 (abstract). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40617026/
  5. Henning DJ et al. The absence of fever is associated with higher mortality and decreased antibiotic and IV fluid administration in emergency department patients with suspected septic shock. Critical Care Medicine 2017;45(6):e575–e582 (abstract). doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002311
  6. NHS, Sepsis: symptoms in adults. www.nhs.uk/conditions/sepsis/