mariuscomper.uk Română

Ten years of lost green, seen from space

How much green your street lost in ten years

Between August 2015 and August 2025, Bucharest lost 437 hectares of green — 3.7% of what was green. We translated three summers of Landsat 8 pictures per side into each street's loss: 3,255 streets measured, 55 parks, 6 sectors — and how much stayed green. Search your street.

Search your street See the 3D map

How much green your street lost#

Type a street. You get the green gone in ten years (of the then-green), the green left (of the measured area), the loss band and the nearest measured park. The loss compares the green of August 2015 with August 2025; “still green” is the percentage of pixels the satellite caught green in the summers of 2024–2026.

Try:

Example street

Green lost on Șoseaua Mihai Bravu, over ten years

0.0% green lost Untouched

  • Still green: 50.7%.
  • From 341 valid pixels (116 green then), around 239 addresses.
  • Nearest measured park: Parcul Național, 1.1 km away (0.0% lost).
How Bucharest streets compare

The middle street of the ranking lost nothing: 0.0%. 68.6% of measured streets lost nothing — the damage concentrates on the fringes and the vacant lots.

The most gnawed street is Strada Suceava: 45.0% of its green gone, across 24 addresses and 20 green-then pixels. Drumul Jilavei lost the largest area of green: 3 hectares, or 30.0% of its green at the start. And Strada Tomis kept all its green: 0.0% lost, 100.0% still green today.

The numbers compare two composites of three clear summers each: August 2015 with August 2025, exactly ten years apart. It is vegetation loss, not necessarily construction — the pixel says the green is gone, not who took it.

Where Bucharest lost green#

The map shows how much green each of the 55 parks lost over ten years. Between them, the surface joins everything: every measured 200-metre cell carries the share of green gone, from untouched green to the red patches where it all went. Grey never had enough green to earn a number.

  • Measured parks
  • Green lost over ten years
  • Buildings / too little green
  • Water

3,255 streets measured · 55 parks · ten years: August 2015 – August 2025

Your browser cannot draw the 3D map, so you see it from above. Drag to move it; + and − zoom.

Drag to move the map; right-click or Shift-drag to turn it; wheel to zoom. Click a park to see its loss.

One finger moves the map, two fingers turn and zoom it. Tap a park to see its loss.

This is all the green gone in ten years: the height of the 55 parks shows the measured loss, and the surface under them shows the share gone. Colour says the band, height says how much went.

Only the parks: 55 parks with about 2 hectares of measured green, measured the same way as the streets. Lakes are cut out, so they don't thin the green artificially. The most gnawed of the large ones is Parcul Liniei, with 7.3% of its green gone.

For example, Șoseaua Mihai Bravu: 0.0% of its green gone, 50.7% still green today, from 341 valid pixels around 239 addresses. The nearest measured park, Parcul Național, is 1.1 km away and lost 0.0%.

Only the streets, through the surface: Strada Suceava lost the most (45.0%, from 20 green-then pixels), Strada Tomis nothing (0.0%, 100.0% still green today). Smârdan has no number: stone on stone, below the five-green-pixel threshold. Rankings keep only streets with at least 20 addresses and 20 green-then pixels.

Only the sectors: the most gnawed is Sector 2, with 5.5% of its green gone (79 hectares) — a tenth of a percentage point above Sector 3, at 5.4%. The least gnawed, Sector 1, at 2.8%: yet it lost the most hectares, 102, being the largest. The Băneasa forest lies in Sector 1.

What the percentages mean#

Every street, park and map cell is coloured by the share of green gone in ten years, in percent; the bands are the same everywhere. It is the share of then-green that is no longer green — construction, clearing or dead green; the pixel cannot tell the cause.

BandLossWhat it looks like
Untouched0%Mihai Bravu sits here, at 0.0% across 239 addresses, beside Herăstrău (0.0%) and Carol (0.0%). 68.6% of measured streets lost nothing.
Barely touched0–2%Tineretului (1.5%) and Șoseaua Giurgiului (1.3%), across 448 addresses, sit here.
Nibbled2–5%Sector 1, the least gnawed sector (2.8%), and Calea Moșilor (4.3%) sit here.
Thinned5–10%Sector 2, the most gnawed sector (5.5%), Parcul Liniei (7.3%) and Calea Victoriei (9.5%) sit here.
Gnawed10–20%Vasile Lascăr is here, at 18.2%.
Eaten awayabove 20%The most gnawed street, Strada Suceava (45.0%), sits here, beside Parcul Unirii (33.3%).

A pixel is 30 metres and mixes everything it catches: grass, tree, roof, street. That is why the page talks about the zone's green, not your door's: the loss is the share of the green around the addresses that is no longer green.

The bands are this analysis's cuts, fitted to the spread of losses: untouched is exactly 0%, “eaten away” above 20%. Every ranking shows the percentage to one decimal. Bands use unrounded percentages: 5 streets and 5 cells sit on an edge — rounded to one decimal they would fall in the next band.

How the number is made#

Each street takes its loss from around its addresses: 50-metre discs around every point in the index, valid pixels from both composites only. Green-then means a vegetation index above 0.35 in the summers-2013–2016 median, with no bare soil or building; lost means below 0.25 in the summers-2024–2026 median and below 0.30 in the latest summer, 2026 — each side backed by at least two clear summers.

The composites are three clear Landsat 8 summers each, centred on August 2015 and August 2025: exactly ten years apart. In each scene, more than 99.9% of pixels are cloud-free, and the three-summer median reduces the influence of a dry summer.

A street with under 3 addresses, under 20 valid pixels, under half of its pixels valid, or under 5 green-then pixels gets no number; rankings keep only streets with at least 20 addresses and 20 green-then pixels. 1,623 streets stayed unmeasured — they show as such, not as zero. Smârdan, for one, has no number: stone on stone.

Limits: the measure only sees losses from clearly-green land — building on already-bare ground is invisible. A ploughed or fallow vacant lot can register as vegetation loss; each pixel covers several types of surface. The 437 hectares are the area classified as loss by this method. And it is not construction on paper: the pixel says the green is gone, not who took it.

Parks and sectors#

The 55 parks with about 2 hectares of measured green, measured the same way as the streets; lakes are cut out, so they don't thin the green artificially. The area is the mapped polygon's, not the official one. Some are squares or neighbourhood greens, not big parks — the label comes from the map. 42 lost nothing. Green left is measured over all valid ground, loss over the then-green: the two don't subtract.

ParkAreaGreen lostGreen left
Parcul Unirii8.2 ha33.3%23.1%
Parcul Liniei21.3 ha7.3%60.3%
Complexul Studențesc Leu9.3 ha4.5%71.8%
Parcul Humulești2 ha4.5%90.9%
Parcul Pantelimon37.6 ha3.7%89.7%
Parcul Floreasca8.9 ha2.1%96.0%
Parcul Tei12.8 ha1.6%91.5%
Parcul Tineretului157.4 ha1.5%86.8%
Parcul Bazilescu14.0 ha1.3%96.8%
Parcul Plumbuita II21.1 ha1.0%92.7%
Parcul Bordei13.0 ha0.8%93.8%
Parcul Kiseleff16.6 ha0.6%97.3%
Parcul Cișmigiu18.3 ha0.5%93.1%
Parcul Carol34.2 ha0.0%87.9%
Parcul Izvor18.2 ha0.0%98.5%
Insula Trandafirilor4 ha0.0%95.6%
Parcul Drumul Taberei15.3 ha0.0%93.5%
Parcul Romniceanu4 ha0.0%97.7%
Parcul Operei5.9 ha0.0%97.0%
Cotroceni19.1 ha0.0%91.0%
Grădina Botanică21.8 ha0.0%99.6%
Parcul Morarilor14.8 ha0.0%94.5%
Parcul Plumbuita14.6 ha0.0%97.5%
Parcul Verdi8.1 ha0.0%94.4%
Parcul Circului17.4 ha0.0%95.3%
Parcul Sebastian3.1 ha0.0%100.0%
Parcul Giulești5.8 ha0.0%98.4%
Parcul Lunca Florilor2.6 ha0.0%100.0%
Parcul Florilor5.2 ha0.0%98.3%
Parcul Obor2.3 ha0.0%92.3%
Parcul Gheorghe Petrașcu4.4 ha0.0%98.0%
Parcul Pecineaga2.2 ha0.0%96.0%
Parcul Motodrom4.8 ha0.0%98.1%
Parcul Sticlăriei6.5 ha0.0%98.6%
Parcul Titănel7.5 ha0.0%98.8%
Parcul Filipescu3.2 ha0.0%100.0%
Parcul Cinema Floreasca2.9 ha0.0%96.9%
Parcul Casa Albă5.7 ha0.0%98.4%
Insula Câinilor4 ha0.0%100.0%
Parcul Regina Maria2.2 ha0.0%95.8%
Parcul Regele Mihai I Al României (Herăstrău)59.8 ha0.0%94.3%
Parcul Crângași10.7 ha0.0%100.0%
Parcul Sfântul Pantelimon4.2 ha0.0%95.7%
Parcul Tudor Vladimirescu3.6 ha0.0%97.5%
Parcul Grozăvești12.9 ha0.0%95.1%
Parcul Național12.3 ha0.0%89.8%
Parcul Dobroești5 ha0.0%100.0%
Parcul Ion Creangă3.1 ha0.0%97.1%
Grădina Botanică USAMV6.1 ha0.0%98.5%
Parcul Eroilor Sanitari3.2 ha0.0%94.3%
Parcul Teilor7.7 ha0.0%89.5%
Administrația Națională de Meteorologie11.1 ha0.0%88.6%
Insula Fundeni4.7 ha0.0%96.2%
Parcul Alexandru Ioan Cuza35.6 ha0.0%99.2%
Parcul Constantin Brâncuși3 ha0.0%97.0%

Sectors

First for damage comes Sector 2, with 5.5% of its green gone (79 hectares) — a tenth of a percentage point above Sector 3, at 5.4%. Last is Sector 1, at 2.8%: yet it lost the most hectares, 102, being the largest. The Băneasa forest lies in Sector 1. The sector hectares don't add to the city total: their rings overlap at the edges, and green left counts all valid ground, not the then-green.

SectorGreen lostHectaresGreen left
Sector 25.5%79 ha51.7%
Sector 35.4%89 ha55.8%
Sector 43.6%67 ha58.0%
Sector 63.2%69 ha63.4%
Sector 53.0%35 ha56.5%
Sector 12.8%102 ha69.8%