Official data, hospital by hospital · 2018–2025
Leg amputations and arterial reconstructions in Romanian hospitals
A leg whose artery is blocked can sometimes be saved with a bypass or an angioplasty. The map shows, for every hospital, how many stays with an amputation and how many with an arterial reconstruction it reported in 2025, and how far you are from the nearest of the 19 arterial reconstruction centres.
In 2025, in 17 counties no hospital in the national discharge tables, state, military or private, reported a single major arterial reconstruction. 5.6 million people live there, and their hospitals reported 1,100 stays with an amputation of the foot, lower leg or thigh.
A leg suddenly cold, pale or numb, or a severe infection: emergency, call 112. The map does not replace a medical assessment.
- Amputations of foot, lower leg, thigh
- Major arterial reconstructions
- County with no reconstruction in 2025
- the hospital’s position is approximated by the town centre
Choose a place or tap the map: the nearest arterial reconstruction centre appears here, with what your county’s hospitals reported.
What each hospital reported in 2025#
Every discharge from a Romanian hospital goes into a diagnosis-related group (RO-DRG v1.1), and the National Institute for Health Services Management publishes, hospital by hospital, how many stays each group had. This page uses five groups, counted in hospital stays, not in people.
Amputation of the foot, lower leg or thigh (F1111 and F1112): 5,170 stays in 2025, more than 14 a day. The grouping rule puts a stay with both a bypass and an amputation into the bypass group, so these are stays without a major reconstruction in the same admission.
Major arterial reconstruction (F1081 and F1082): 5,336 stays. The group covers bypass on the leg arteries, but also grafts on the aorta and the pelvic arteries. A count in this group therefore does not mean legs saved; a zero means the hospital reported no stay in these two groups.
Other arterial procedures (F1141–F1143): 45,118 stays: balloon angioplasty or stenting, removal of a clot, surgery on the carotid artery. Creating dialysis fistulas is not in it. There are also amputations of fingers and hand (4,744 stays, F1130) and diabetic foot surgery (2,257 stays, K1010), a group that also includes some amputations in people with diabetes.
1,948 of the 5,170 stays with an amputation (38 per cent) took place in 150 hospitals that reported no major arterial reconstruction in 2025. Another 1,187 took place in hospitals with fewer than 50: in all, 61 per cent of amputations.
The 17 counties with no major arterial reconstruction in 2025#
All hospitals of each county in the national tables are added up: state, military and private. Where the total of major arterial reconstructions is zero, the county is in the table. In 7 of the 17 counties the total was zero in each of the eight years from 2018 to 2025, among the hospitals that filed in that year: Botoșani, Gorj, Caraș-Severin, Mehedinți, Vrancea, Teleorman, Giurgiu.
In these counties there were, in 2025, 1,100 stays with an amputation of the foot, lower leg or thigh, 1,048 with an amputation of a finger or the hand, and 709 for the diabetic foot. Ilfov has zero reconstructions but is 19 minutes from Bucharest.
| County | Foot, leg, thigh amputations | Fingers and hand | Diabetic foot | Other arterial procedures | Residents (thousand) | Minutes to the nearest centre | Years with none, of 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botoșani | 123 | 111 | 101 | 33 | 393 | 74 | 8 |
| Călărași | 86 | 43 | 0 | 13 | 283 | 82 | 1 |
| Olt | 85 | 59 | 91 | 28 | 383 | 66 | 4 |
| Vaslui | 81 | 52 | 69 | 36 | 375 | 95 | 6 |
| Buzău | 79 | 53 | 3 | 193 | 405 | 100 | 6 |
| Brăila | 78 | 75 | 87 | 42 | 281 | 43 | 3 |
| Gorj | 66 | 106 | 4 | 95 | 315 | 119 | 8 |
| Vâlcea | 66 | 90 | 7 | 5 | 342 | 87 | 1 |
| Caraș-Severin | 65 | 31 | 22 | 3 | 247 | 116 | 8 |
| Dâmbovița | 58 | 65 | 203 | 342 | 479 | 71 | 4 |
| Mehedinți | 57 | 37 | 14 | 16 | 234 | 119 | 8 |
| Vrancea | 56 | 95 | 33 | 11 | 335 | 92 | 8 |
| Teleorman | 49 | 77 | 51 | 14 | 324 | 110 | 8 |
| Giurgiu | 46 | 34 | 7 | 0 | 262 | 55 | 8 |
| Ialomița | 43 | 62 | 10 | 12 | 251 | 87 | 7 |
| Tulcea | 34 | 43 | 5 | 145 | 193 | 90 | 5 |
| Ilfov | 28 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 543 | 19 | 7 |
How far the nearest arterial reconstruction centre is#
The calculation starts from the 19 state or military hospitals that reported at least 50 major arterial reconstructions and at least 20 stays with an amputation in 2025. The second condition leaves out three hospitals with at least 50 reconstructions but fewer than 20 amputations: the heart institutes in Iași and Cluj and the military hospital in Sibiu. The reconstruction group also includes operations on the aorta. For every commune and town, the drive to the nearest one is calculated without traffic. Of 19.1 million residents, 8.4 million (44 per cent) are more than an hour from such a hospital, 3.9 million (21 per cent) more than an hour and a half, and 1.2 million more than two hours.
Nine private hospitals with at least 50 reconstructions together reported 1,911. All are in Bucharest, Timișoara, Iași or Sibiu, in the same city as a state centre, so they change the drive little; other private clinics report fewer reconstructions, and cost and access are outside this page.
The centres: the 19 state or military hospitals with at least 50 major arterial reconstructions and 20 amputations in 2025
| Hospital | County | Reconstructions | Amputations | Other arterial procedures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutul de Boli Cardiovasculare C. C. Iliescu București | București | 396 | 103 | 972 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Pius Brînzeu Timișoara | Timiș | 309 | 259 | 736 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Sf. Spiridon Iași | Iași | 234 | 214 | 441 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Târgu Mureș | Mureș | 205 | 147 | 871 |
| Spitalul Clinic Județean de Urgență Oradea | Bihor | 203 | 79 | 628 |
| Spitalul Universitar de Urgență București | București | 193 | 139 | 1,039 |
| Spitalul Clinic de Urgență Militar Central · military | București | 152 | 46 | 4,087 |
| Spitalul Clinic de Urgență Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu · military | București | 89 | 40 | 471 |
| Spitalul Județean de Urgență Bacău | Bacău | 88 | 117 | 195 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Sf. Apostol Andrei Galați | Galați | 88 | 69 | 430 |
| Spitalul Județean de Urgență Sf. Ioan cel Nou Suceava | Suceava | 80 | 84 | 571 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Cluj-Napoca | Cluj | 77 | 125 | 2,253 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Brașov | Brașov | 74 | 115 | 230 |
| Spitalul Clinic de Urgență București | București | 74 | 29 | 836 |
| Spitalul Clinic Județean de Urgență Constanța | Constanța | 73 | 67 | 859 |
| Spitalul Județean de Urgență Dr. Constantin Opriș Baia Mare | Maramureș | 73 | 66 | 361 |
| Spitalul Județean Pitești | Argeș | 67 | 89 | 988 |
| Spitalul Clinic Județean Sibiu | Sibiu | 64 | 82 | 971 |
| Spitalul Județean Clinic de Urgență Craiova | Dolj | 60 | 130 | 1,180 |
The test the hypothesis failed: in counties without reconstruction, hospitals reported fewer amputation stays per resident#
The hypothesis was written down before any calculation: in counties without reconstruction, stays with an amputation per 100,000 residents would be at least 35 per cent higher than in counties with at least 50 reconstructions. The result is the opposite. The median is 20.2 in the 16 counties without reconstruction, against 29.4 in the 15 with at least 50 reconstructions (ratio 0.69, p = 0.008). The same calculation on appendicectomies, an operation that does not depend on vascular surgery, gives medians of 20.9 and 24.5 (p = 0.62): the difference runs the same way and is not significant, so part of the gap may come from where people are treated in general.
A hospital counts the stays in it, not the residents of its county. Someone who lives in a county without reconstruction and is operated in Iași, Cluj or Bucharest appears in that city’s statistics. The data do not hold the patient’s county of residence, so they cannot show whether families in counties without reconstruction are amputated more or less often. The page does not claim that missing reconstruction raises a county’s number of amputations; it shows where reconstructions are done and how far away they are.
From 2018 to 2025: more reconstructions, almost the same amputations#
In the 197 hospitals that filed reports in every year, stays with a major arterial reconstruction rose from 2,103 to 2,966, by 41 per cent, and those with other arterial procedures from 11,682 to 22,166. Stays with an amputation of the foot, lower leg or thigh stayed almost level (4,376, then 4,295), and diabetic foot surgery fell from 2,407 to 1,721. These are stays, not people; the data do not show how many patients needed revascularisation or arrived too late.
Three county hospitals show the pattern over time. In Râmnicu Vâlcea, reconstructions fell from 59 in 2018 to zero in 2025, while amputations stayed between 60 and 88 a year. Călărași had 50 in 2021, then zero in every year from 2022, with 62 to 89 amputations a year. In Botoșani the county hospital reported no reconstruction in any of the eight years, and between 79 and 114 amputations a year.
What these numbers do not say#
A stay is not a person: someone with an amputation of a toe, then of the foot, appears twice. A zero means zero reported in groups F1081 and F1082, not proof that an operation is done nowhere else or under another code.
A hospital with many reconstructions may receive the hard cases from other counties, so the ratio of amputations to reconstructions is not a quality ranking. Nor are all amputations avoidable: in a patient with wet gangrene and infection, amputation can be the operation that saves life.
At hospital level, 39 of the 81 that reported at least 30 amputations of any kind reported no reconstruction, but for 19 of them another hospital in the same county did. That is why the page counts counties, not hospitals.
The drive is an estimate without traffic, from the centre of each settlement to the hospital, on the OpenStreetMap network. The model was tuned on 8,670 OSRM routes of 3–75 minutes (mean error three minutes on that set). On 24 routes over 75 minutes, compared with the public OSRM server, the model’s estimate was, in the median, 2 per cent lower than the OSRM server’s, with a mean absolute difference of 7 per cent and a largest difference of 40 per cent lower; no drives were timed. The exact position of some hospitals is approximated by the town centre; the map marks them with a ring.
If an amputation is proposed: what the guidelines say#
This is not advice for any particular case, and the page has not been reviewed by a vascular surgeon. The international guidelines say the following.
The international guideline on chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Global Vascular Guidelines, 2019) asks that a non-urgent amputation be discussed in a team after a full vascular and functional assessment. Primary amputation may be appropriate, after specialist assessment and a shared decision with the patient, when the artery can no longer be reconstructed, when the foot can no longer bear weight, when infection threatens life, or when life expectancy is very short.
The guideline on arterial disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer (IWGDF/ESVS/SVS, 2023) asks for urgent consultation with a vascular surgeon if the ischaemia is severe or the ulcer is infected or gangrenous, and says there should be a centre that offers both endovascular treatment and bypass, or at least quick access to one.
A leg that suddenly turns cold, pale or loses feeling or movement is a medical emergency: the European guideline on acute limb ischaemia (ESVS, 2020) asks for immediate assessment by a vascular surgeon.
For symptoms that start suddenly or a severe infection, call 112 or go to an emergency department at once. Do not delay treatment or a transfer the doctors recommend in order to look for another hospital. The team discussion and full vascular assessment apply to amputations that are not urgent.
All 212 hospitals with amputations of the foot, lower leg or thigh in 2025#
Method and sources#
The data are the public INMSS tables per hospital and diagnosis group: 545 files for 2025 and 3,582 files for 2018 to September 2026. The 2018–2024 files cover about 200 hospitals; those of 2019, 2022 and 2025 cover more, including private clinics. The 2018–2025 series therefore use only the 197 hospitals present in every period, while the count of counties without reconstruction uses all hospitals that filed in the year.
Groups F1111, F1112, F1130, F1081, F1082, F1141–F1143 and K1010 were checked in the RO-DRG v1.1 manual: the grouping order (F08 before F11), the procedures in each table (the aorta in F08, angioplasty and the carotid in F14, amputation with diabetes also in K01) and that creating dialysis fistulas is not in F14. The licensed grouper was not available.
The hypothesis and its threshold (at least 35 per cent more amputations, p below 0.01) were written before the calculation. The unit is the hospital’s county; Bucharest and Ilfov are taken together (16 counties without reconstruction, 15 with at least 50). The condition of at least 20 amputation stays for a centre was added after a first test of the map, to keep out the heart institutes; the county test does not use centres. Population is from the 2021 census, without age structure: the CNAS diabetes register could not be used. A Poisson regression gives the ratio 0.72 (interval 0.67–0.76), a negative binomial one 0.74 (interval 0.60–0.92).
Drive times: the OpenStreetMap road network, class speeds capped at 80 per cent of the tagged speed and scaled on 8,670 OSRM routes; for each of the 13,750 settlements, the time to each centre, then the minimum. For population, each county’s 2021 census total (Bucharest separately) is spread over its communes and towns in proportion to their population. Hospital positions come from Nominatim or OpenStreetMap; for 13 of them the position is the town centre.
Sources
- INMSS, hospital morbidity indicators by diagnosis-related group (RO-DRG), per-hospital tables, 2018–2026
- RO-DRG v1.1 grouping manual, volume 1 (order of the surgical groups, pp. 90–101)
- RO-DRG v1.1, appendix E: the procedures of each group (F08, F13, F14, K01)
- Conte et al., Global Vascular Guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia, J Vasc Surg 2019;69:3S–125S
- IWGDF/ESVS/SVS guideline on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer, 2023
- ESVS, Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Limb Ischaemia, 2020
- INS, 2021 census, resident population by commune and town
- OpenStreetMap Romania, Geofabrik extract of 30 October 2026 (road network and hospital locations)
- Natural Earth, admin-1 boundaries