mariuscomper.uk
English

Vienna 1892 – Cluj 1894 – Vienna 1895

The trial that convicted an empire

On 28 May 1892, 300 Romanian delegates carry a Memorandum to Vienna: equal rights or nothing. The Emperor forwards it unread to Budapest, and the authors end up in the dock at Cluj in May 1894. Fourteen are convicted – and the conviction itself makes them famous across Europe.

A student demonstration in Bucharest in 1892 for the Romanians of Transylvania: Theatre Square. Unknown photographer, 1892 · Wikimedia Commons

The story, in four chapters

A compromise made without the Romanians, in 1867. A petition carried by 300 people, in 1892. A trial at Cluj, in May 1894. And a pardon that repaired nothing, in 1895.

Each chapter keeps the same landmarks: the dates, one scene told in the sources' own words, one period image, and one anchor in what Europe was doing meanwhile.

Chapter I

Patience

1867 – 1892 · 23 years of passivity

Chapter
1867 – 1892
The Compromise
1867, Transylvania joins Hungary
Passivity
after 1869
The committee
25 members

After the Compromise of 1867, Transylvania is part of Hungary again, and the Romanians – a majority population – are left without ethnic standing. At first the Romanian National Party takes part in political life; after 1869, following disagreements, it chooses passivity: no more elections it considers rigged.

The grievances are three: the Romanians are underrepresented in the Budapest Parliament through electoral abuse and a higher property qualification; they face Magyarization; and Transylvania lost its autonomy with nobody asking the Transylvanians.

The front page of Tribuna of Sibiu, 27 May 1892, no. 118: the Memorandum is about to leave for Vienna. Tribuna, Sibiu, 27 May 1892 · Wikimedia Commons

In 1892, a 25-member party committee – president Ioan Rațiu, secretary general Vasile Lucaciu – puts all of it in writing: the Memorandum demands political rights for the Romanians and denounces the intolerance of the Hungarian kingdom.

Dr. Lucaciu was sentenced to a year in prison, where he was barbarously punished, so that he nearly lost his eyesight.

The Standard, 7 May 1894, as quoted in the Cluj study

Meanwhile In 1884 Georges Clemenceau writes about the Romanians in La Justice; in 1892 their cause reaches the diplomats' desks too – the Borchgrave report, in November.

Chapter II

Vienna

1892 · 28 May, no audience

Chapter
1892
The delegation
300 people
The presentation
28 May 1892
The answer
forwarded unread to Budapest

At the end of May 1892, 300 delegates from the Transylvanian localities go to the Imperial Court. They are granted no audience with the Emperor: the imperial cabinet sends the document straight to the government in Budapest. On 28 May 1892 the Memorandum is presented – and its long road back, unopened, begins the same day.

The paper trail is short to tell: Franz Joseph forwards the petition, unread, to prime minister Gyula Szapáry; he sends it on, still unopened, to the lord lieutenant of Torda-Aranyos, to be returned to its sender, Ioan Rațiu.

The signatories of the Transylvanian Memorandum, 1892: the men who signed their names to the confrontation. Unknown photographer, 1892 · Wikimedia Commons

The refusal does not stop the memorandists: they print the document at Sibiu, and the sequel is violent – Rațiu's house in Turda is wrecked by demonstrators, his family flees to Sibiu, and across the Carpathians the outrage is enormous. In Vienna the delegation is welcomed at a rally by Karl Lueger, the future mayor, who condemns the oppression of the Slav nations and the Romanian one.

The Romanians are as lambs against wolves, and the Romanian peasant's mantle is every bit as worthy as the Hungarian shirt.

Karl Lueger, Vienna 1892 (after the period account)

Meanwhile The Belgian ambassador in Vienna, Borchgrave, writes to his minister about the Romanians on 19 November 1892.

Chapter III

The trial

1894 · Cluj, 7 – 25 May

Chapter
1894
The hearing
7 May 1894, the Reduta hall
The verdict
25 May 1894
The convictions
14, from two months to five years

Because the document was printed and spread, its authors face justice in May 1894, accused of incitement through the press. The charges run from disturbing the peace to high treason – Lucaciu is charged with betraying the homeland. Day I, 7 May: president Szentkereszty Zsigmond opens the proceedings at 8:30, in the Reduta hall at Cluj, and the accused enter accompanied by their defenders.

Midway through the hearings comes the turn: the defenders withdraw, Rațiu asks for an adjournment in everyone's name, the court refuses – there are lawyers enough among the accused, they can plead their own cause. The accused announce nullity, then accept going on: the Reduta hall lives its first day without scandals, and the dock turns into a rostrum.

Vasile Lucaciu (1852 – 1922), the Lion of Șișești: five years of hard prison, the heaviest sentence. Period portrait · Wikimedia Commons
Ioan Rațiu at 70, in 1898: the president who carried the Memorandum and got two years. Unknown photographer, 1898 · Wikimedia Commons

Then come the speeches: Rațiu speaks about the laws, Lucaciu – the group's orator – about the injustices, and Coroianu rises in everyone's name. On 25 May the sentence is pronounced: 14 guilty of agitation, under Articles 173 and 171, with punishments from two months to five years of state prison.

What is debated here is the very existence of the Romanian people. But the existence of a people is not debated, it is affirmed.

Ioan Rațiu, in the courtroom, Cluj 1894

Meanwhile On 7 May 1894 The Standard writes about the Roumanians in Hungary; on 10 May Le Matin follows, with the Trial of the Roumanians.

Chapter IV

The echo

1894 – 1895 · the September 1895 pardon

Chapter
1894 – 1895
The press
London, Paris, Bucharest
The heavy sentence
five years, one served
The pardon
September 1895

The trial wins what the petition had lost: Europe's attention. The Romanian students of Vienna, Graz, Budapest and Cluj print their solidarity manifestos starting in the summer of 1893, with foreign-language versions sent to political and press circles in the West; in Bucharest the Golgota sheet crucifies the injustice on its front page.

The convicts do not stay locked up for long: in September 1895 the Emperor pardons them. The release is the fruit of a diplomatic game – King Carol I intervenes directly with Franz Joseph, and Dimitrie Sturdza proposes the saving formula to premier Bánffy: individual pardons, not amnesty, so Budapest can save its honour.

The wives of the Memorandum's signatories, 1894: in the hall, the women were present. Unknown photographer, 1894 · Wikimedia Commons

The pardon comes too late to mend anything: trust in the House of Habsburg falls, and more and more leaders see the union of Transylvania with Romania as the only way out. Union activism waits, though, for the Great War and Trianon – Romania oscillates between the Powers, and Archduke Franz Ferdinand promises a federal Austria.

If we are convicted, the whole people will act for us.

The accused, in unison, after the Pesti Napló correspondent, Cluj 1894

Meanwhile The memorandists' cause is carried in song too: Lucaciu's Doina is dedicated to the Lion of Șișești in the prison years.

The trial day by day: Cluj, May 1894

Four moments, from the morning opening (8:30) to the verdict: the accused, the turn, the speeches and the 14 sentences – then the punishment table, as the press of the day printed it.

  1. 7 May 1894Day I: the accused and the defenders

    President Szentkereszty Zsigmond opens the proceedings at 8:30, in the Reduta hall, and calls the accused together with their counsel: Rațiu with Amos Frâncu, Pop de Băsești with Aurel Isac, Lucaciu with Milos Stefanovits, Comșa with Aurel Mureșeanu, Barcianu with Matei Dula.

    The hearings run daily, without interruption: the Reduta hall is full, the peasants who came to Cluj wait outside, and the press – Hungarian, Romanian, European – takes notes.

  2. 11 – 12 May 1894The turn: without defenders

    The defenders withdraw, and Rațiu asks, in everyone's name, for an indefinite adjournment. The court refuses: in misdemeanour cases no counsel is appointed, and there are several lawyers among the accused – let them defend themselves. The accused announce nullity, then agree to carry on.

    It is the first day without scandals – the Reduta hall becomes, the Pesti Napló correspondent writes, a serious venue of jurisprudence. Lucaciu jokes that the court deserves a petition of thanks from the Romanians, and a second translator arrives from Debrecen.

  3. May 1894The speeches: the dock becomes a rostrum

    Rațiu speaks about the laws and about how the Memorandum came to be; Lucaciu, with oratorical ornaments, but to the point. Coroianu rises and speaks in the name of all the accused. Only now, the Budapest press writes, do you recognise Rațiu and Lucaciu.

    Rațiu's sentence passes from the hall into the press and into history: the existence of a people is not debated. It is affirmed.

  4. 25 May 1894The verdict: 14 convictions

    The jury finds them guilty of agitation, under Article 173 of the Hungarian penal code, for acts committed through the press, under Article 171: 14 state-prison sentences, from two months to five years. The lightly sentenced feel the shame – some are humiliated to have got less than the group.

    Lucaciu, regarded as the group's leader, gets the heaviest punishment: five years. His wife congratulates him on the most years – and the solidarity of the 14 turns the sentence into a celebration of the cause.

What they were tried for

  • Disturbing the peace and incitement through the press – printing and spreading the Memorandum
  • Agitation, under Article 173, through the press, under Article 171
  • High treason – for Lucaciu: betraying the homeland

The 14 sentences, 25 May 1894

The table, in the verdict's order, as the press reproduced it:

The convictThe sentence
Ioan Rațiu2 years
Gheorghe Pop de Băsești1 year
Vasile Lucaciu5 years
Dimitrie Comșa3 years
Daniil P. Barcianu2 years 6 months
Nicolae Cristea8 months
Iuliu Coroianu2 years 8 months
Patriciu Barbu2 months
Teodor Mihali2 years 6 months
Aurel Suciu1 year 6 months
Mihai Veliciu2 years
Rubin Patiția2 years 6 months
Gherasim Domide2 years 6 months
Dionisie Roman8 months

The sentences were served in part: Lucaciu walks out after one year, and in September 1895 the imperial pardon frees them all.

Defend yourself at Cluj

Four moments from the trial. Choose the line of defence, then learn what Rațiu and Lucaciu really said.

  1. 1

    The defenders

    7 May 1894, the Reduta hall. The lawyers stand beside the accused. What happens to the defence?

    What happened

    The defenders withdrew; Rațiu asked for an adjournment in everyone's name, the court refused, and the accused went on alone – the first day without scandals, the Pesti Napló correspondent noted.

  2. 2

    The responsibility

    The charge is incitement through the press. What position does the group take?

    What happened

    The whole group assumed the responsibility and any mistakes – nobody filed a separate opinion.

  3. 3

    The word

    Rațiu takes the floor before the bench. What does he say?

    What happened

    “What is debated here is the very existence of the Romanian people. But the existence of a people is not debated, it is affirmed.”

  4. 4

    The Lion

    Lucaciu, before the court that had convicted him before. What tone does he choose?

    What happened

    Lucaciu said the court deserved a petition of thanks from the Romanians, since its excessive vigour had served the Romanian cause – and then charmed the hall.

The Memorandum in six numbers

The figures that hold the whole story:

1,867
the Compromise that erases Transylvania's autonomy
1,892
the Memorandum goes to Vienna
300
Romanian delegates at the Imperial Court
14
convicted at Cluj
5
years of hard prison for Lucaciu
1,895
the imperial pardon frees them all

Three things people get wrong

  1. It was a mere petition

    False: a committee with a national mandate, 300 delegates at Vienna, a trial with 14 convictions and a whole Europe reading the press reports – a constitutional confrontation, lost in court and won in Europe's press.

  2. The Emperor read the document and rejected it

    False: Franz Joseph sent it unread to prime minister Szapáry, who sent it – unopened – to the lord lieutenant of Torda-Aranyos, who returned it to Rațiu. The refusal was not a reading, but an evasion.

  3. They were acquitted, because they were right

    False: 14 were convicted, between two months and five years, and freedom came through an imperial pardon, in September 1895 – a diplomatic bargain, not an acquittal.

Sources and method

The story follows two academic studies – the Cluj trial and the Transylvanian Review – checked against the English and Romanian reference articles. Every date is confirmed by at least two sources; variants are printed, not smoothed.

The variant figures: the delegation counts 300 people after the study and after Rațiu's biography, while the Memorandum's Romanian article counts 237; the pardon decree is dated now 15, now 19 September 1895 – the page prints the month only.

Of the accused, the page names only the 14 with verified sentences; Rațiu's sentence is printed without a day, in the wording of the Cluj monument.

Images