Measured from space, December 2020 – November 2025
Where the ground is sinking under Romanian homes
For five years the Sentinel-1 radar satellites followed how 1.9 million squares of 100 metres across Romania rose or fell. Under 94 in 100 built-up squares the ground moved no more than 2 mm a year. The largest built-up area that is sinking adjoins the city of Timișoara, in Dumbrăvița: about 2 km², down by 4.9 cm on average.
A country drawn by radar#
The map is made of 100 by 100 metre squares that the Sentinel-1 radar satellites could follow from orbit; at country scale, 36 of them are gathered into each 600 m point. Forests, ploughed fields and water do not return a stable signal, so they stay empty; villages, roads and towns appear on their own. There are 1.9 million squares, 466,201 of them built up.
For each square, the EU's Copernicus service calculated how much the ground rose or fell per year between December 2020 and November 2025.
Almost everywhere, nothing#
Under 94 in 100 built-up squares, the ground moved no more than 2 mm a year, up or down. That line is about three times the uncertainty the service itself states for a velocity (0.7 mm a year), so the page treats any value between −2 and +2 mm a year as still.
Only 0.55% of built-up squares, 2,577 of them, sink by at least 5 mm a year. Grouped with their neighbours they form 44 areas with at least ten built-up squares each. On the country map, a 600 m point is lit when at least four of its 100 m squares, and at least a fifth of those measured, sink that fast, whatever the land.
Dumbrăvița: 2 km² going down#
The largest of these areas adjoins the north of Timișoara, Romania's third-largest city, in Dumbrăvița, a separate village municipality on the city's northern edge: 204 built-up squares, about 2 km², sink by at least 5 mm a year. Their median is −9.0 mm a year and the fastest reach −20.2 mm. On average the area fell by 4.9 cm in five years, at a steady rate, without speeding up.
It is not only recently built land. Squares already built up in 2000, according to the European map of buildings, sink too (−8.9 mm a year, median), not just those first built up after 2005 (−5.1 mm a year). The land is flat and does not move sideways, so the landslide check flagged nothing, and the sinking shows separately from both directions the satellites look from.
This was known: a 2015–2020 radar atlas by the company Terrasigna wrote that Dumbrăvița was "slowly subsiding", with its highest values, 8–10 mm a year, on a new estate. The 2020–2025 measurements show that it went on. No published study found for this article establishes the cause.
The plain around Timișoara#
Dumbrăvița is not alone. The same plain has more sinking areas, including one inside Timișoara itself; in brackets, their median in mm a year: Timișoara, north-west (−16.8), Ianova (−18.4) and Giarmata-Vii (−5.8).
Ianova sinks by a median −18.4 mm a year, twice as fast as Dumbrăvița, but over a much smaller area.
The Teleorman plain and the Târnave plateau#
The second kind of place in the ranking is the plain around Videle, south-west of Bucharest: Blejești and its neighbours sink by a median −6.2 mm a year along a strip several kilometres long. Videle is an oil field worked since 1961, and the Terrasigna atlas recorded sinking of 3–9 mm a year here in 2015–2020, over an area more than 20 by 5 km.
On the Târnave plateau near Sighișoara, Daneș, Albești and Apold sink by 8 to 13 mm a year, and near Târgu Mureș, Curteni and its neighbours by about 7 mm a year. For the area near Târgu Mureș the same atlas wrote that it remains to be seen whether the motion is linked to gas extraction and storage or to the slopes. Radar cannot tell the cause, so the page says "near", not "because of".
The salt towns: almost all quiet#
When Romanians talk about ground caving in, the first names are the salt-mine towns. For this article all ten were taken from public lists (Turda, Praid, Cacica, Ocna Dej, Ocna Mureș, Târgu Ocna, Ocnele Mari, Slănic, Ocna Sibiului, Ocna Șugatag), and the rule was written down before the calculation: within 2 km of the mine's point (the mine where it is mapped, otherwise the town centre), at least ten built-up squares sinking by 5 mm a year or more, and their share of built-up squares at least three times the share 4–6 km away. If fewer than three towns passed, the idea was dropped.
Only one passed: Slănic, with 19 sinking built-up squares, down to −11.6 mm a year. Only one of the satellites' two viewing directions covers the area well, and it shows the sinking (−3.1 mm a year against the surroundings). Researchers describe soil being washed by water into voids in the salt here; in April 2024 a street fell into a crater about 2 metres deep. In the national ranking Slănic's area comes only 23rd; none of the top 20 lies within 6 km of the salt-mine points.
At Ocna Mureș the fastest squares (−17.7 mm a year) lie around Lake 23 August and the industrial site beside it, where there are hardly any houses: only 2 of the 9 are built up.
Praid: nothing before, nothing clear after#
The Praid salt mine flooded at the end of May 2025, after the Corund stream rose a hundredfold. The measurement series runs through the flood and on to November 2025.
Before the flood, the ground around the mine was sinking as slowly as the ground 4–6 km away, under 1 mm a year, and not speeding up: the difference in acceleration is 0.03 mm a year squared, far below the noise. Afterwards some squares sink faster, but a similar share do far from the mine (11 per cent around it, 11 per cent 4–6 km away), and six months are too few to tell a trend from a seasonal swing. At this resolution, the measurements showed no warning sign before the flood.
Is the ground sinking under your street?#
Type a town or village, or tap the map. The answer covers the 100 m squares around the point, compared with those 4–6 km away. It measures the area, not any single building.
Try:
Pick a place to see what the satellite measures there.
Drag to move the map, use + and − or the wheel. Tap a point for the answer there.
The largest sinking built-up areas#
The largest sinking built-up areas
| Place | County | Sinking built-up squares | Median, mm/yr | Fastest | Checks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timiș | 204 | −9.0 | −20.2 | older houses too · flat ground · seen from both directions | |
| Mureș | 83 | −7.9 | −17.3 | older houses too · flat ground · one direction, which shows the sinking | |
| Galați | 63 | −6.1 | −8.9 | older houses too · flat ground · one direction, which shows the sinking | |
| Teleorman | 61 | −6.2 | −10.7 | older houses too · flat ground · seen from both directions | |
| Mureș | 56 | −6.9 | −9.9 | older houses too · flat ground · seen from both directions | |
| Dâmbovița | 55 | −7.1 | −12.0 | older houses too · flat ground · seen from both directions | |
| Galați | 53 | −6.1 | −12.4 | older houses too · flat ground · one direction, which shows the sinking | |
| Constanța | 45 | −6.5 | −9.9 | mixed · flat ground · one direction, which shows the sinking | |
| Timiș | 44 | −16.8 | −25.3 | older houses too · flat ground · seen from both directions | |
| Tulcea | 42 | −7.2 | −14.3 | older houses too · flat ground · one direction, which does not show the sinking | |
| Teleorman | 41 | −6.9 | −10.6 | ||
| Timiș | 40 | −18.4 | −21.6 | ||
| Galați | 39 | −6.4 | −17.5 | ||
| Timiș | 32 | −5.8 | −7.8 | ||
| Teleorman | 30 | −15.1 | −21.9 | ||
| Timiș | 30 | −5.4 | −6.3 | ||
| Sălaj | 29 | −6.3 | −8.8 | ||
| Mureș | 26 | −8.1 | −15.1 | ||
| Mureș | 24 | −5.9 | −11.1 | ||
| Tulcea | 22 | −6.8 | −10.9 | ||
| Teleorman | 20 | −16.0 | −21.2 | ||
| Mureș | 20 | −13.4 | −37.8 | ||
| Prahova | 17 | −7.9 | −11.6 | ||
| Brașov | 17 | −8.2 | −11.6 | ||
| Sălaj | 17 | −11.1 | −30.2 | ||
| Mureș | 16 | −7.6 | −12.5 | ||
| Sălaj | 16 | −7.8 | −23.5 | ||
| Sălaj | 16 | −6.4 | −7.8 | ||
| Botoșani | 16 | −6.9 | −20.3 | ||
| Brașov | 14 | −5.6 | −10.5 | ||
| Sibiu | 14 | −6.1 | −8.3 | ||
| Mureș | 14 | −5.4 | −7.3 | ||
| Timiș | 13 | −13.4 | −19.0 | ||
| Mureș | 13 | −5.3 | −7.9 | ||
| Botoșani | 13 | −9.1 | −15.2 | ||
| Teleorman | 12 | −15.6 | −21.8 | ||
| Prahova | 12 | −6.6 | −8.3 | ||
| Brașov | 12 | −6.5 | −11.8 | ||
| Mureș | 12 | −9.7 | −15.6 | ||
| Gorj | 11 | −10.1 | −15.3 | ||
| Gorj | 10 | −6.4 | −10.5 | ||
| Galați | 10 | −7.1 | −8.9 | ||
| Sălaj | 10 | −15.7 | −27.9 | ||
| Botoșani | 10 | −7.1 | −9.9 |
Areas of neighbouring squares sinking by at least 5 mm a year, with at least ten built-up squares; the place is the OpenStreetMap locality nearest the area's centre. Checks were run for the top ten only.
How it was measured, and what it cannot say#
The data is the "Ortho" product of the European Ground Motion Service (EGMS, Copernicus), 2025 release: the vertical motion of the ground on a grid of 100 m squares between 9 December 2020 and 25 November 2025. Each square combines Sentinel-1 radar measurements taken from two directions, from the east and from the west. The service puts every square's series on a common time grid, one value every six days (303 values). The series are tied to the network of GPS stations; that tie is a slow tilt, about 1 mm a year here, the same for an area and its surroundings, so it cannot create an area that sinks relative to its neighbours.
The service states an uncertainty of 0.7 mm a year for the velocity of a square. An area counts as "built up" if the European buildings map (GHSL 2020) has at least 1,000 m² of buildings in its 90 m square. The 5 mm a year threshold, the 2 km and 4–6 km distances and the list of ten salt mines were written down before the calculation; the salt idea failed by its own rule, and the page became the national ranking.
Each of the top ten areas was checked three ways: whether squares built up before 2000 sink too (so it is not just new houses settling), whether the ground slopes or slides sideways (so it is not a landslide), and whether the motion shows separately from both of the satellites' directions, where both cover the area. The ranking shows the result for each. The order below first place depends on the threshold: at −3 mm a year five of the same places stay in the top ten, at −8 mm a year three. Dumbrăvița is first at all three.
What it cannot say: radar only sees what returns a stable signal, so it misses forests, fields and water. It does not catch sudden motion, such as a collapse overnight, nor very fast motion. A 100 m square is an average: a particular house can move differently from its square. Radar shows motion, not its cause; a cause is written here only where a study or an official document states it.
If you see new cracks or doors that no longer close, do not rely on a map: tell the town hall, which issues building permits, and in an emergency call 112.
Sources#
- European Ground Motion Service, Ortho product, vertical, 2025 release (9.12.2020–25.11.2025), Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, doi:10.2909/4a14a29b-7db7-40e4-81ad-df3aa8dfbc6f, plus the Ortho east–west and Calibrated (per-direction) products, read through the EGMS Explorer on 29.10.2026. Generated using European Union's Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information, with funding by the European Union; the map and calculations are my own processing.
- Global Human Settlement Layer, GHS-BUILT-S R2023A (1975–2020), European Commission, JRC.
- Places: OpenStreetMap (© OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL), with commune and county from the administrative boundaries; country outline: Natural Earth. Slopes: Copernicus DEM GLO-30, © DLR e.V. 2010–2014 and © Airbus Defence and Space GmbH 2014–2018, provided under the Copernicus programme.
- Terrasigna, National Ground Motion Monitoring: Romania between 2015–2020 (Timișoara and Dumbrăvița p. 12, Târgu Mureș p. 26, Videle p. 40).
- Slănic: Necula and Niculiță, EGU 2025; Năstase et al., EGU 2026.
- Praid: Salrom, press release of 27 May 2025; Radio Free Europe Romania, 29 May 2025.
- Ocna Mureș: Lake 23 August and the industrial site, from OpenStreetMap. Videle: the oil field, worked since 1961 (Wikipedia). Velocity uncertainty and the six-day grid: EGMS Product Description.
- The data, decoding scripts and the tests fixed in advance are kept with the project.