mariuscomper.ukRO

Greater London, measured against the Thames

London below the tide: every postcode measured against the Thames at high water

Twice a month, around full and new moon, the tides run higher: spring tides. On an ordinary one the Thames at London Bridge rises to 3.9 m above Ordnance Datum, the zero of British maps. 10,528 of Greater London's 177,041 postcodes stand on ground lower than that. River walls hold the daily tide back. Since 1982 the Thames Barrier has been closed against storm tides and, when the river is in flood, against ordinary ones: 221 times by November 2025.

or try

Ground: the Environment Agency's laser survey. Tides: the Port of London Authority's 2026 tables and its hand-written gauge ledgers for 1911–1995, published as data in 2021. Nothing here is a forecast: the page sets surveyed ground beside river levels recorded at London Bridge.

The map needs a browser that can draw it. The figures are in the text and in the table of districts below.

The daily tide

On a spring tide the river rises 6.6 m, twice a day

At London Bridge a spring tide lifts the Thames from 2.7 m below Ordnance Datum at low water to 3.9 m above it at high water. A week later, at neaps, high water reaches 2.7 m. These are the Port of London Authority's standard levels, from its 2026 tables.

The staff on the map carries those levels. Drag its marker, or step through the tides with the button: the map picks out every piece of ground lower than the level you set. It shows height and nothing else. Whether water could reach a place depends on the walls between it and the river.

3.9 m

10,528 postcodes stand below a spring high tide

Greater London has 177,041 postcodes with ground of their own. The ground at 10,528 of them, about 6%, is lower than 3.9 m. The districts with most are SE1 (1,418), E16 (757), SE16 (730), SE17 (678) and SW1P (537).

In area that is 66 km² of the capital's 1,552 km² of land. Nearly all of it lies beside the tidal river and its creeks. 310 of those postcodes are outside the Environment Agency's flood zones for the sea altogether: low spots away from the river, which the survey records as ground like any other.

The lowest reading at any postcode is 5.3 m below Ordnance Datum, at E20 1YY in Stratford.

High water does not stand at one height along the Thames: by the same tables an average spring tide reaches about 3.0 m at Southend, on the estuary, and about 4.2 m at Richmond. Every comparison on this page uses London Bridge.

7 January 1928

1928: 5.21 m, and the river came over the Embankment

At 01:10 on 7 January 1928 the gauge by London Bridge read 5.21 m, 1.3 m above today's ordinary spring tide. A surge from the North Sea had met a river swollen by snowmelt.

The Thames poured over the embankments at Southwark, Lambeth, Temple Pier and the Houses of Parliament. Fourteen people drowned, ten of them in the slums on the Westminster side of Lambeth Bridge. “The people who died were poor people living in crowded basements,” Anna Carlsson-Hyslop of the University of Manchester told the BBC. It was the last time a storm surge flooded central London.

1 February 1953

1953: 5.41 m, the highest tide in the ledgers

On the night of 31 January 1953 a storm surge ran down the North Sea and killed 307 people along the east coast of England. It reached London Bridge at 02:06: 5.41 m, the highest of the 57,909 high waters logged there between 1911 and 1995.

In central London the river “did not quite overtop the Thames embankment”, as a 2015 study of the surge puts it. Downriver it did more. In the East End 100 yards of sea wall collapsed, more than 1,130 houses were flooded and one person died at Tidal Basin.

18,724 of today's postcodes stand on ground lower than that tide.

Since 1982

Walls for the daily tide, a gate for the storm

The Thames Barrier crosses the river near Woolwich: 520 m wide, ten steel gates, the main ones 3,300 tonnes each. It has been operational since 1982, and the Environment Agency's log dates its first closure against a tide to 1 February 1983.

The Agency describes the division of work like this. Upstream of the Barrier, “the walls and embankments protect against daily high tides. The Thames Barrier protects these areas against storm tides.” Downstream the walls are higher (by about 2 m from one side of the gates to the other, the Agency wrote in 2015), and “the Thames Barrier does not protect these areas from flooding”.

The City of London gives the level the Agency requires of its river walls, upstream of London Bridge, as 5.41 m above Ordnance Datum. The ledgers give the 1953 tide the same figure.

1983 to 1995

After the first closure, no tide above 4.81 m in the ledgers

From the first closure to the end of the ledgers in 1995, the highest tide at London Bridge was 4.81 m, on 1 March 1990. The Environment Agency's own gauge at Tower Pier, running since 1988, lists that same tide as its highest (read on 9 October 2026).

Before 1983 the ledgers hold 13 higher tides. The chart shows the highest tide of each year.

4.04.55.05.5spring high water 3.9first closure, 19837 January 1912: 4.53 m25 January 1913: 4.53 m15 March 1914: 4.35 m9 December 1915: 4.63 m14 September 1916: 4.63 m26 March 1917: 4.37 m16 January 1918: 4.63 m18 February 1919: 4.45 m27 December 1920: 4.37 m1 November 1921: 4.68 m21 October 1922: 4.32 m12 October 1923: 4.32 m28 December 1924: 4.58 m4 September 1925: 4.42 m23 October 1926: 4.35 m26 December 1927: 4.61 m7 January 1928: 5.21 m22 September 1929: 4.32 m8 November 1930: 4.55 m28 December 1931: 4.53 m28 November 1932: 4.60 m13 April 1933: 4.20 m18 January 1934: 4.27 m6 February 1935: 4.62 m1 December 1936: 4.65 m14 March 1937: 4.47 m13 February 1938: 5.07 m9 March 1939: 4.57 m3 November 1940: 4.72 m21 October 1941: 4.36 m2 April 1942: 4.27 m8 April 1943: 4.67 m26 January 1944: 4.88 m17 January 1945: 4.47 m5 April 1946: 4.37 m4 April 1947: 4.36 m29 January 1948: 4.36 m1 March 1949: 5.09 m6 February 1950: 4.52 m29 November 1951: 4.93 m3 December 1952: 4.57 m1 February 1953: 5.41 m4 April 1954: 4.60 m11 January 1955: 4.79 m31 January 1956: 4.30 m26 September 1957: 4.75 m14 October 1958: 4.66 m31 December 1959: 4.54 m29 January 1960: 4.57 m21 March 1961: 4.85 m8 February 1962: 4.60 m26 March 1963: 4.60 m13 May 1964: 4.51 m10 December 1965: 5.24 m16 September 1966: 4.82 m5 October 1967: 4.79 m21 December 1968: 4.69 m20 February 1969: 4.51 m6 April 1970: 4.57 m1 February 1971: 4.60 m24 October 1972: 4.57 m14 December 1973: 4.77 m12 February 1974: 4.60 m29 January 1975: 4.84 m22 January 1976: 4.72 m13 November 1977: 4.82 m31 December 1978: 5.21 m2 February 1979: 4.57 m25 October 1980: 4.65 m14 November 1981: 4.73 m11 January 1982: 4.51 m31 January 1983: 4.50 m25 November 1984: 4.51 m7 April 1985: 4.60 m2 November 1986: 4.66 m21 November 1987: 4.46 m21 March 1988: 4.60 m15 December 1989: 4.58 m1 March 1990: 4.81 m3 January 1991: 4.42 m30 August 1992: 4.49 m17 October 1993: 4.56 m30 January 1994: 4.62 m18 March 1995: 4.65 m19281953196519781920194019601980
Highest tide of each year at London Bridge, 1912–1995, in metres above Ordnance Datum (the ledgers begin in May 1911). Hollow marks: from 1983, the year of the Barrier's first closure.
The Agency's map

What the Environment Agency maps, defences left out

For planning, the Environment Agency maps the land that would flood “ignoring the benefits of defences”. Its Flood Zone 3 from the sea is the land with a chance of 1 in 200 or more each year in that case. 18,150 Greater London postcodes lie inside it, about one in ten; it covers 112 km².

The outline on the map is that zone together with Flood Zone 2, which runs out to 1 in 1,000. The Agency adds that the zones “are not suitable for showing whether an individual property is at risk of flooding”.

How many times has the Thames Barrier closed?

221 times for flood defence between 1982 and 17 November 2025, by the Environment Agency's count: 119 against the tide alone and 102 when a high tide met a river in flood. Pick a winter.

10203040501982–83: 11983–84: 01984–85: 01985–86: 11985–861986–87: 11987–88: 01988–89: 11989–90: 41990–91: 21990–911991–92: 01992–93: 41993–94: 71994–95: 41995–96: 41995–961996–97: 11997–98: 11998–99: 21999–00: 62000–01: 24242000–012001–02: 42002–03: 20202003–04: 12004–05: 42005–06: 32005–062006–07: 82007–08: 62008–09: 52009–10: 52010–11: 02010–112011–12: 02012–13: 52013–14: 50502013–142014–15: 12015–16: 12016–17: 22017–18: 42018–19: 22019–20: 992020–21: 62020–212021–22: 72022–23: 22023–24: 13132024–25: 02025–26: 0 (to 17 Nov)2025–26tide alonetide and river flow

Dates, levels and flows to March 2007 are the Environment Agency's closure log. It gives the Southend levels without naming a datum; they agree with heights above Ordnance Datum in the tide ledgers. For later seasons the Agency has published counts, not dates.

One winter against eighteen. In the flood season of 2013–14 the Barrier closed 50 times. In its first eighteen seasons together, 1982–83 to 1999–2000, it closed 39 times. Seven complete seasons since 1982 have had no closure at all, the latest of them 2024–25.

Why 2013–14 stands so high. 41 of those 50 closures were of the combined kind: a tide coming in to meet a river in flood. The Barrier “may also be closed during periods of high flow over Teddington Weir”, the Agency writes. “This is to reduce the risk of river flooding in some areas of west London including Richmond and Twickenham.” Closed just after low tide, it keeps the incoming tide out of the reach above, which leaves room for the river coming down. The Agency closed it on 48 occasions between 2 January and 5 March 2014.

What the count cannot show. A closure is a decision. “The barrier has no individual trigger level for closure”, says the Agency: a matrix of tide, surge and river flow guides the Duty Controller, who decides. So the bars measure each winter's weather and the decisions taken on it, and they are not a record of sea level.

What comes next. The Agency expects that “as sea levels rise, the barrier will be closed more and more often”, and that closing it too often would leave too little time to maintain it. Its plan is to raise the walls upstream, so that higher tides can be let through, and to choose by 2040 among seven options that run from upgrading the Barrier to building a new one downriver.

Every London postcode district against the tide

271 districts with 30 postcodes or more in Greater London, ordered by the share of their postcodes that stand below an ordinary spring high tide at London Bridge (3.9 m). Each has its own page to send.

DistrictMostly inPostcodesBelow 3.9 mShareGround at most postcodesIn Flood Zone 3 (sea)
SE17Southwark68467899%2.5 … 3.5 m593
DA18Bexley686799%0.9 … 1.3 m67
E16Newham1,04175773%1.1 … 5.8 m1,011
SE28Greenwich43831772%1.1 … 5.8 m332
SW1PWestminster74953772%3.0 … 4.5 m749
SE1Southwark1,9961,41871%2.2 … 4.5 m1,871
SE11Lambeth49633868%3.0 … 4.3 m472
SE16Southwark1,10573066%1.5 … 5.6 m980
SW1HWestminster915763%2.7 … 4.5 m91
SE2Greenwich46325655%0.7 … 63 m261
E6Newham92338442%1.4 … 8.1 m467
SW8Lambeth85535241%2.1 … 6.0 m552
SE5Southwark88133138%2.8 … 29 m274
SE8Lewisham58221837%2.0 … 6.7 m366
SW1VWestminster57221237%3.2 … 5.2 m571
SE14Lewisham41914936%2.8 … 23 m149
SW1EWestminster832935%3.3 … 5.1 m79
SE15Southwark1,19538832%2.6 … 23 m321
SW11Wandsworth1,52547931%3.0 … 19 m969
IG11Barking and Dagenham1,01730730%2.2 … 8.4 m403
E13Newham58317129%1.6 … 8.1 m98
SE10Greenwich84822727%2.3 … 17 m482
DA17Bexley3379027%1.1 … 53 m91
W14Hammersmith and Fulham63717027%3.5 … 5.9 m198
RM13Havering65516926%2.8 … 9.5 m166
E14Tower Hamlets1,89647825%2.3 … 7.8 m1,356
SW6Hammersmith and Fulham1,50537325%3.4 … 5.6 m1,198
E1WTower Hamlets4079724%3.2 … 13 m219
E15Newham81018122%2.9 … 10 m227
SW1AWestminster1432719%3.4 … 15 m71
W6Hammersmith and Fulham7699813%3.8 … 5.7 m699
E12Newham3965013%3.6 … 14 m72
SE7Greenwich4324711%3.7 … 49 m67
RM9Barking and Dagenham568468%5.1 … 11 m50
SW13Richmond upon Thames373288%4.0 … 6.3 m304
EC4YCity of London12397%4.1 … 13 m32
DA8Bexley655477%4.6 … 49 m107
SE18Greenwich1,450795%5.1 … 67 m159
RM10Barking and Dagenham582193%5.0 … 15 m11
TW9Richmond upon Thames597183%4.5 … 9.0 m120
W12Hammersmith and Fulham815202%4.6 … 12 m197
SW7Kensington and Chelsea628132%6.2 … 14 m0
SW1WWestminster34172%4.4 … 6.7 m113
WC2RWestminster10422%5.4 … 15 m10
SW9Lambeth968182%5.1 … 15 m0
TW8Hounslow53481%5.8 … 12 m83
DA1Bexley26841%6.4 … 29 m20
SW10Kensington and Chelsea46861%5.3 … 7.8 m83
EC3NCity of London8111%12 … 16 m1
SW3Kensington and Chelsea86891%5.3 … 7.8 m61
EC4VCity of London1111<1%4.5 … 14 m22
WC2NWestminster1391<1%5.1 … 19 m12
SW5Kensington and Chelsea3062<1%6.0 … 8.2 m1
SW1YWestminster1821<1%8.2 … 17 m1
SW1XWestminster4002<1%5.7 … 9.5 m2
E20Newham2251<1%8.5 … 14 m2
E3Tower Hamlets1,1742<1%6.7 … 13 m31
W8Kensington and Chelsea6851<1%7.0 … 29 m0
W4Hounslow1,0221<1%5.0 … 9.0 m680
SW18Wandsworth1,24000%5.8 … 23 m123
WC2BCamden17500%18 … 23 m1
TW7Hounslow75700%7.0 … 25 m26
TW1Richmond upon Thames66400%5.6 … 10 m85
SW14Richmond upon Thames36500%5.5 … 18 m71
E9Hackney68000%5.8 … 16 m84
KT1Kingston upon Thames68500%7.3 … 15 m19
SW15Wandsworth1,22500%8.4 … 41 m17
E10Waltham Forest60700%7.0 … 21 m1
EC4RCity of London5600%5.6 … 13 m9
IG1Redbridge91100%7.7 … 16 m7
RM12Havering62600%10 … 25 m0
W11Kensington and Chelsea73200%6.9 … 28 m0
TW11Richmond upon Thames55600%7.1 … 13 m45
EC4MCity of London9300%10 … 17 m0
SE13Lewisham73500%8.3 … 29 m3
W3Ealing1,15800%7.8 … 33 m5
RM8Barking and Dagenham58700%7.7 … 17 m0
SW4Lambeth92900%12 … 29 m0
EC3RCity of London7800%6.1 … 15 m8
KT2Kingston upon Thames68500%7.8 … 47 m14
TW10Richmond upon Thames51500%7.0 … 33 m5
E5Hackney66300%7.1 … 28 m0
WC2EWestminster16600%17 … 24 m0
KT6Kingston upon Thames65500%11 … 34 m3
E17Waltham Forest1,52900%10 … 33 m0
EC4ACity of London11000%8.2 … 18 m0
EC1MIslington16800%12 … 19 m0
RM14Havering57000%15 … 33 m0
EC4NCity of London6800%11 … 16 m0
SE24Lambeth29500%16 … 36 m0
TW12Richmond upon Thames55600%13 … 18 m0
EC2YCity of London8900%13 … 18 m0
E11Waltham Forest83900%14 … 29 m0
W10Kensington and Chelsea69100%10 … 33 m0
IG3Redbridge49100%9.3 … 18 m0
N17Haringey1,12700%8.9 … 21 m0
N15Haringey71400%9.4 … 21 m0
E1Tower Hamlets1,51300%10 … 14 m0
IG4Redbridge13800%14 … 30 m0
SE3Greenwich79500%23 … 46 m0
TW2Richmond upon Thames55700%10 … 20 m0
E7Newham53700%9.3 … 13 m0
RM7Havering57300%13 … 22 m0
W9Westminster57300%24 … 33 m0
N16Hackney1,12300%21 … 30 m0
SW17Wandsworth99900%11 … 34 m0
EC1ACity of London16500%14 … 18 m0
RM1Havering51600%15 … 36 m0
SW19Merton1,65900%14 … 53 m0
E4Waltham Forest94000%15 … 56 m0
RM11Havering57200%19 … 34 m0
EC2MCity of London16200%12 … 18 m0
N18Enfield54800%11 … 21 m0
EC1NCamden15500%14 … 20 m0
W7Ealing51000%17 … 31 m0
W1JWestminster66200%14 … 21 m0
IG8Redbridge74500%15 … 66 m0
KT5Kingston upon Thames37400%19 … 34 m0
EC2RCity of London7200%12 … 16 m0
EC1RIslington26500%14 … 30 m0
EC2AHackney33600%15 … 18 m0
W5Ealing1,00600%22 … 45 m0
E18Redbridge36300%16 … 54 m0
N9Enfield87600%12 … 20 m0
E2Tower Hamlets97200%13 … 17 m0
DA5Bexley36100%14 … 39 m0
EC2NCity of London4600%12 … 16 m0
EC3MCity of London7900%15 … 17 m0
E8Hackney72900%15 … 19 m0
EC3ACity of London6600%14 … 16 m0
EC2VCity of London9900%14 … 17 m0
W2Westminster1,12400%20 … 30 m0
SW20Merton57000%14 … 41 m0
TW13Hounslow69100%14 … 20 m0
IG2Redbridge41200%16 … 27 m0
IG5Redbridge23800%17 … 39 m0
KT3Kingston upon Thames75300%14 … 21 m0
WC2HCamden34500%18 … 24 m0
EN3Enfield1,00300%15 … 21 m0
WC1XCamden32200%14 … 28 m0
TW3Hounslow76300%17 … 24 m0
UB1Ealing61400%25 … 34 m0
WC2ACamden11200%17 … 22 m0
W1KWestminster87300%19 … 26 m0
EC3VCity of London7800%15 … 18 m0
SE12Lewisham51400%17 … 51 m0
SW2Lambeth1,03300%19 … 57 m0
N4Haringey86800%23 … 42 m0
SE4Lewisham46400%20 … 36 m0
UB6Ealing85800%19 … 52 m0
TW14Hounslow47300%18 … 23 m0
SE6Lewisham86000%17 … 39 m0
RM6Redbridge53000%17 … 27 m0
CR4Merton90900%17 … 30 m0
EC1VIslington48100%18 … 24 m0
DA7Bexley67300%33 … 58 m0
WC1ECamden10800%25 … 28 m0
N1Islington2,28200%18 … 37 m0
SM4Merton58000%18 … 39 m0
SW12Wandsworth59400%22 … 31 m0
W1SWestminster55200%19 … 24 m0
N1CCamden8200%19 … 27 m0
N22Haringey71900%18 … 41 m0
EC1YIslington17300%17 … 20 m0
RM2Havering26800%29 … 35 m0
NW1Camden1,65600%22 … 34 m0
WC1HCamden30600%19 … 24 m0
W13Ealing59500%22 … 40 m0
TW4Hounslow42800%19 … 24 m0
SE22Southwark50400%20 … 54 m0
IG6Redbridge56800%26 … 49 m0
RM5Havering38000%27 … 56 m0
N8Haringey69900%23 … 57 m0
WC1VCamden9400%20 … 24 m0
EN1Enfield95700%22 … 33 m0
DA14Bexley50700%27 … 65 m0
W1GWestminster70100%23 … 26 m0
W1TCamden91900%26 … 28 m0
W1WWestminster61700%26 … 28 m0
WC1ACamden14700%18 … 25 m0
WC1BCamden15500%23 … 26 m0
WC1NCamden27200%20 … 24 m0
KT4Sutton39600%21 … 36 m0
W1DWestminster69400%22 … 26 m0
SW16Lambeth1,35200%29 … 62 m0
UB2Ealing53100%26 … 31 m0
IG9Redbridge3200%24 … 76 m0
WC1RCamden7900%20 … 25 m0
TW5Hounslow39900%24 … 30 m0
TW6Hillingdon12200%23 … 25 m0
EN8Enfield3000%20 … 25 m0
N13Enfield52700%23 … 44 m0
W1BWestminster29400%22 … 27 m0
W1UWestminster1,06900%22 … 26 m0
W1FWestminster75400%24 … 26 m0
W1CWestminster14000%22 … 27 m0
DA6Bexley25000%40 … 57 m0
HA0Brent86000%28 … 58 m0
SE23Lewisham62400%31 … 77 m0
SM5Sutton70600%29 … 82 m0
W1HWestminster68900%25 … 28 m0
SE9Greenwich1,20900%36 … 70 m0
N5Islington41400%26 … 43 m0
NW10Brent1,84700%30 … 50 m0
UB7Hillingdon63200%25 … 31 m0
SM3Sutton37600%27 … 56 m0
UB3Hillingdon98700%26 … 40 m0
N21Enfield55700%26 … 59 m0
SE26Lewisham62900%29 … 95 m0
NW6Camden1,28800%30 … 62 m0
RM3Havering92300%33 … 58 m0
SE21Southwark29600%29 … 63 m0
SM6Sutton75600%27 … 80 m0
HA9Brent1,00200%32 … 54 m0
EN2Enfield83200%31 … 66 m0
BR1Bromley1,26100%41 … 73 m0
BR3Bromley1,12500%30 … 54 m0
DA16Bexley56600%44 … 61 m0
DA15Bexley49900%32 … 46 m0
N7Islington90100%28 … 46 m0
UB8Hillingdon82200%31 … 48 m0
SM1Sutton83100%36 … 59 m0
N11Barnet61100%36 … 62 m0
UB4Hillingdon70400%30 … 41 m0
N14Enfield68900%50 … 84 m0
KT9Kingston upon Thames38800%32 … 50 m0
SE20Bromley48400%33 … 58 m0
NW5Camden89500%33 … 50 m0
CR0Croydon2,78900%40 … 110 m0
UB5Ealing83900%32 … 53 m0
NW8Westminster83500%34 … 48 m0
N19Islington64000%36 … 71 m0
NW3Camden1,31800%49 … 110 m0
UB10Hillingdon71100%36 … 56 m0
UB9Hillingdon20500%40 … 89 m0
NW9Barnet1,47900%43 … 59 m0
BR2Bromley1,00500%46 … 95 m0
BR5Bromley93300%44 … 83 m0
CR7Croydon60900%40 … 60 m0
HA4Hillingdon1,13700%36 … 52 m0
HA3Harrow1,26100%41 … 73 m0
SE27Lambeth37700%43 … 81 m0
HA2Harrow96400%42 … 64 m0
NW2Brent1,33300%43 … 66 m0
N6Haringey49400%69 … 124 m0
SE25Croydon63700%43 … 78 m0
EN4Barnet56300%51 … 95 m0
NW4Barnet75700%50 … 80 m0
IG7Redbridge18400%44 … 60 m0
CR2Croydon99600%55 … 154 m0
N10Haringey51000%51 … 102 m0
HA7Harrow84400%54 … 116 m0
NW11Barnet83200%53 … 78 m0
HA5Harrow1,09300%48 … 70 m0
HA8Barnet1,40100%51 … 72 m0
N3Barnet62800%63 … 90 m0
HA1Harrow95400%54 … 79 m0
BR7Bromley46000%66 … 98 m0
SE19Croydon59900%67 … 111 m0
N12Barnet69800%65 … 90 m0
NW7Barnet80000%61 … 110 m0
N20Barnet53200%69 … 97 m0
BR6Bromley1,11500%58 … 116 m0
SM2Sutton55200%62 … 94 m0
HA6Hillingdon52700%66 … 92 m0
BR4Bromley37200%63 … 87 m0
CR8Croydon79100%65 … 134 m0
N2Barnet54500%71 … 97 m0
EN5Barnet1,01800%71 … 130 m0
CR5Croydon56000%81 … 161 m0
TN16Bromley30000%143 … 207 m0

Ground at most postcodes: the band that holds eight in ten of the district's postcodes (10th to 90th percentile), in metres from Ordnance Datum.

Questions

How many times has the Thames Barrier been closed?

221 times for flood defence since it became operational in 1982, according to the Environment Agency's Barrier page as at 17 November 2025: 119 closures against tidal flooding and 102 against combined tidal and river flooding. The season with most was 2013–14, with 50. The Agency's 2026 review of its estuary plan gives 211 closures “between 1982 and 2025”; the two figures are the Agency's and the difference is not explained in either place.

What is the highest tide recorded at London Bridge?

In the Port of London Authority's ledgers for 1911–1995, 5.41 m above Ordnance Datum at 02:06 on 1 February 1953. The ledgers were digitised by the University of Southampton and the Environment Agency. The next highest are 10 December 1965 (5.24 m), 7 January 1928 and 31 December 1978 (both 5.21 m). The ledgers begin in May 1911; earlier tides are not covered, and for the years after 1995 this page has only the maximum the Agency's gauge lists, 4.81 m.

How much of London is below high tide?

By the survey of the ground, 66 km² of Greater London's 1,552 km² of land is lower than an ordinary spring high tide at London Bridge (3.9 m above Ordnance Datum), and 10,528 of 177,041 postcodes stand on such ground. Against the 1953 tide (5.41 m) the figures are 109 km² and 18,724 postcodes. The Authority gives the spring level to a tenth of a metre: at 3.85 m the count would be 10,287, at 3.95 m 10,754.

Is my home at risk of flooding?

This page cannot say. It compares the height of the ground with the height of past tides at London Bridge, and takes no account of walls, gates, drains or the route water would have to travel. For the long-term flood risk of the area around an address there is the government's service “Check the long term flood risk for an area in England”; it too does not tell you how likely a single property is to flood.

Why Ordnance Datum and not Chart Datum?

Tide tables give heights above Chart Datum, a low-water level chosen for navigation; maps and surveys give heights above Ordnance Datum Newlyn. At London Bridge, Chart Datum lies 3.20 m below Ordnance Datum, so a tide-table height of 7.1 m is 3.9 m on the map's scale. The offset changes from one tide station to the next.

How exact are the ground levels?

A postcode's level is the middle value of the Environment Agency's terrain survey in the 50 m square around the postcode's point. Where that square slopes or holds a cutting, a dock or a raised deck, the page adds the band in which most of the square lies (its 10th to 90th percentile). The survey records the ground as it is now, made ground and excavations included, so the lowest readings are often sunken structures.

Sources and method

Ground levels come from the Environment Agency's LIDAR Composite Digital Terrain Model (1 m, averaged to 10 m cells). A postcode's level is the middle value of the 25 cells, a 50 m square, around the point Ordnance Survey's Code-Point Open gives for it; 3,406 PO-box and single-user codes are left out. Areas of ground are counted on the 10 m grid inside the borough outlines of the Office for National Statistics, water left out; the flood zone's area is measured on its own outline. River levels are the Port of London Authority's standard levels from its 2026 tables, moved from Chart Datum to Ordnance Datum, and the high waters in its ledgers for 1911–1995. Closures per season were transcribed from the Environment Agency's chart and checked against its totals; dated closures to March 2007 come from the Agency's log and agree with the chart season by season. Every postcode is compared with London Bridge, wherever it is, and the comparison is of heights alone.

  • Environment Agency, The Thames Barrier: closure totals, closures by flood season, how the Barrier works. gov.uk
  • Environment Agency, Flood Defence Closures, long version, issued 31 March 2007 (closures 1 to 103), as hosted by RealClimate. realclimate.org
  • Environment Agency, LIDAR Composite Digital Terrain Model, 1 m. Open Government Licence. data.gov.uk
  • Environment Agency, Flood Map for Planning: Flood Zones. Open Government Licence. data.gov.uk
  • Environment Agency, Managing future flood risk and Thames Barrier: Thames Estuary 2100. gov.uk
  • Environment Agency, Thames Estuary 2100: 15-year monitoring review (2026). gov.uk
  • Environment Agency blog, Keeping London safe from flooding (2015; the figure for the walls is in the Agency's reply to a comment) and The calm after the storms (2014). environmentagency.blog.gov.uk
  • Environment Agency, flood-monitoring service, station 0007 Tower Pier. environment.data.gov.uk
  • Port of London Authority, Handbook of Tide Tables and Port Information 2026: chart datums and standard levels. pla.co.uk
  • Haigh, Inayatillah and others (2021), Historic sea level records in the Thames Estuary, UK, 1911–1995. British Oceanographic Data Centre. Open Government Licence. doi.org
  • Inayatillah and others (2022), Digitising historical sea level records in the Thames Estuary, UK. Scientific Data 9. doi.org
  • Wadey and others (2015), A comparison of the 31 January–1 February 1953 and 5–6 December 2013 coastal flood events around the UK. Frontiers in Marine Science 2. doi.org
  • Jon Kelly, The great 1928 flood of London. BBC News Magazine, 16 February 2014. bbc.co.uk
  • City of London Corporation, riverside strategy papers: statutory flood defence levels. democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk
  • Ordnance Survey, Code-Point Open. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026; Royal Mail data © Royal Mail copyright and database right 2026. ordnancesurvey.co.uk
  • Office for National Statistics, local authority district boundaries. Open Government Licence. geoportal.statistics.gov.uk
  • Water and place names: © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. openstreetmap.org
  • Check the long term flood risk for an area in England (GOV.UK). gov.uk