mariuscomper.ukRO

The Alhambra, Granada

Are all 17 in the Alhambra? It depends who counts. Count them yourself.

Mathematics says a pattern that repeats in every direction across a flat surface can do so in exactly 17 ways. The walls of the Alhambra are said to hold them all. Those who counted, from Edith Müller in 1944 to Lynn Bodner in 2013, found 11, 12, 13, 14 or 17, each by different rules. Set your rules and count.

A wall covered in glazed tiles: white, black, green, blue and yellow commas around six-pointed stars.

With all the colours, this wall no longer lands on itself after any turn: the colours follow no visible rule, so no mirrors or glides survive either. Only the shifts remain: p1, the least symmetric of the 17.

A tiled dado at the Alhambra, in the Patio de los Arrayanes according to the photo’s file page. The classifications are ours. Emparán shows how Nasrid tilings of this kind were put in different groups, depending on how much of the colour each researcher kept. Photo: michael clarke stuff, CC BY-SA 2.0.

How many of the 17 are in the Alhambra, by your rules?

Below is every example four researchers have published for each of the 17 kinds, with where it is. Choose whose eyes you trust and which rules you accept. The count updates as you go.

Whose examples you trust
What you accept
Count like:

17 of 17

  1. p1
    • Bodner 2013 plaster wall covering, Cuarto de los Leones
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Patio de los Arrayanes, Comares Palace
  2. p2
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Alhambra Museum
    • Pérez-Gómez 1987 Alhambra Museum, piece no. 1361 only with interlace
  3. pm
    • Bodner 2013 incised plaster, in the passage from Cuarto Dorado to Patio de los Arrayanes
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 piece R. 1375, Alhambra Museum
    • Emparán 2019 the columns of the Cuarto Dorado portico (the “Clavo” tiling) only with colour
  4. pg
    • Bodner 2013 painted on plaster, inside façade of the Puerta del Vino only with interlace
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Puerta del Vino
    • Pérez-Gómez 1987 the ceramic floor of the side chamber of the Sala de los Abencerrajes only with colour
  5. cm
    • Bodner 2013 a whole wall incised in plaster, Sala de los Reyes
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Salón de Comares
    • Emparán 2019 a piece from the Alhambra Museum (the “Clavo” tiling) disputed
  6. pmm
    • Bodner 2013 mosaic dado, Sala de los Reyes
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Sala de los Reyes, Palace of the Lions
  7. pmg
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 the fountain in the Cuarto Dorado courtyard
    • Pérez-Gómez 1987 a fresco on display in the Alhambra Museum only with colour
  8. pgg
    • Bodner 2013 brick floor, Mirador de Lindaraja
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Mirador de Lindaraja, Palace of the Lions
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 the floor of the Sala de los Ajimeces
    • Pérez-Gómez 1987 floors (Sala de los Ajimeces) and ceilings (Puerta del Vino)
  9. cmm
    • Bodner 2013 tiled dado, Salón de Embajadores
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 the niche at the entrance to the Salón de Comares
  10. p4
    • Bodner 2013 plaster wall covering, Cuarto de los Leones
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 the gallery by the Sala de los Mocárabes, Patio de los Leones
  11. p4m
    • Bodner 2013 tiled dado, Mirador de Lindaraja
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Torre de las Infantas
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Salón de Comares
  12. p4g
    • Bodner 2013 tiled dado, Mexuar
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Salón de Comares, Comares Palace
    • Emparán 2019 the columns of the Cuarto Dorado portico (the “Clavo” tiling) disputed
  13. p3
    • Bodner 2013 tiled dado in a recess of the Patio de los Arrayanes
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Alhambra Museum
    • Grünbaum 2006 Montesinos’s example, place not given only with colour disputed
  14. p3m1
    • Bodner 2013 a 14th-century hexagonal tile, Alhambra Museum small piece rejected by the author
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 the arch between the Sala de los Abencerrajes and the Patio de los Leones, inside a petal
    • Pérez-Gómez 1987 a chair from the Alhambra’s furniture, now in the museum
    • Pérez-Gómez 1987 the muqarnas of the entrance arch to the Sala de los Abencerrajes small piece
    • Grünbaum 2006 the decoration on the back of a chair (Montesinos’s example) in the museum · small piece disputed
  15. p31m
    • Bodner 2013 painted on plaster, under the vault of the Puerta del Vino
    • Bodner 2013 incised in plaster, in the passage from Cuarto Dorado to Patio de los Arrayanes
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Puerta del Vino
  16. p6
    • Bodner 2013 mosaic covering a whole wall, Sala de los Reyes
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 Palacio del Partal
  17. p6m
    • Bodner 2013 tiled dado, in the Alhambra Museum
    • Bodner 2013 a reproduction of it, Sala de los Reyes restored
    • Blanco & Harris 2011 a window of the Patio de los Arrayanes

Who counted, and what did they find?

How many kinds each found
WhoWhenHow manyHow they counted
Edith Müller1944, thesis, Zürich11 or 12The first count. The sources below disagree on her result.
Grünbaum, Grünbaum and Shephard1986at most 13Found p2, pg, pgg and p3m1 missing.
José María Montesinos1987, book17Photographs for all, counting colours or not, case by case; a reviewer wrote that it settled the question “once and for all”.
Rafael Pérez-Gómez1987, article17Hunted the missing groups; found them in the museum, on a chair, in a 10 by 5 cm detail, on floors.
Branko Grünbaumseveral days in 1983; published 200613Müller’s groups and one more. The criteria, he asks, must be explicit and applied consistently.
Blanco and Harris201117Counted colours and overlooked damage; three examples are museum pieces.
Lynn Bodner201314Only patterns in place in the palace today, on walls, floors or ceilings, at least a square metre, colour ignored, interlace counted. Missing: p2, pmg, p3m1.
Patronato de la Alhambraofficial website17Does not say by which rules.

The first number is already uncertain. Edith Müller wrote her thesis in Zürich in 1944, supervised by the mathematician Andreas Speiser. Bodner, Pérez-Gómez and Emparán say she found 11 kinds; Grünbaum says 12. Grünbaum seems to have worked closest to it: he mentions a 1984 letter from Müller and explains where the figure 14 came from, a misreading of a remark in the thesis.

The claim that the Alhambra holds all 17 also appears on the monument trust’s own website, without saying by which rules. Grünbaum explains how it spread: authors copying from authors who copied from others, “all without any actual investigation”.

Why don’t they agree?

Colour. A Nasrid craftsman could set the same shape in three colours, to a rhythm of his own. Count the colours and the symmetry breaks; ignore them and it appears. Emparán shows how one drawing was classified three ways, depending on how much of the colour each researcher kept. Grünbaum reproaches Montesinos for counting colours “whatever he finds convenient”.

Interlace. Many patterns are bands passing over and under one another. If you track which one is on top, some mirrors vanish. Pérez-Gómez’s only example of p2 exists only if you count the interlace.

Size and place. Lynn Bodner counted only patterns of at least about one square metre that are in the palace today, on walls, floors or ceilings. So she rejected a hexagonal tile in the museum that would have given p3m1. Pérez-Gómez found the same group on the back of a museum chair and in a detail about 10 by 5 centimetres above a doorway.

Restoration. Rafael Contreras remade whole decorations in the second half of the 19th century, and the museum keeps tiles that were reused and recut. Pérez-Gómez notes that the pm paving in the Cuarto Dorado courtyard is a 1965 restoration.

What do the rules look like on the walls today?

The photographs below were published freely by visitors. The classifications are ours and can be checked by eye; where a researcher described the same kind of panel, I quote them.

White and coloured bone-shaped tiles set in rows on the dado of a niche.

The Nasrid “bone”, the dado of a niche in the Salón de Embajadores cmm

At first sight the white and coloured bones look alike and the pattern seems to have quarter-turns. Close up, the white bones are wider: the quarter-turn goes, leaving crossed mirrors and half-turns, cmm. Bodner classifies the dado in the same hall the same way: the white bones are “substantially larger”.

Foto / Photo: Jl FilpoC, CC BY 4.0.

Square tiles in many colours set on the diagonal, with small eight-pointed stars between them.

Squares and small stars, Patio de los Arrayanes according to the photo’s file page p4m

Without colour, the squares and stars have quarter-turns, and mirrors pass through every centre of rotation: p4m. With colour nothing survives: neighbouring squares differ in colour with no visible rule.

Foto / Photo: michael clarke stuff, CC BY-SA 2.0.

Eight-pointed stars in black, blue, green and yellow on a white ground.

Interlocking stars, the dado of the Mexuar according to the photo’s description p4g

The quarter-turns are certain. Bodner finds p4g in the Mexuar dado and recognises it by the small squares made of four triangles. On this photo I could not confirm the mirrors through the stars, so the classification stays p4g after Bodner or, if the mirrors are missing, p4.

Foto / Photo: Ashaio, CC BY 4.0.

Carved plaster: a lattice of lozenges with cartouches holding Arabic inscriptions.

A lattice of lozenges with inscriptions, carved plaster, Salón de Embajadores p1

The lattice alone would have mirrors. But the cartouches hold text, and writing has no symmetry: it reads one way only. Count the inscriptions and only shifts remain, p1. Bodner uses the same argument for her p1 example.

Foto / Photo: michael clarke stuff, CC BY-SA 2.0.

Who made these walls?

The Nasrid dynasty settled in Granada in 1238, under Muhammad I, called al-Ahmar. Most of the palaces with glazed tile mosaic, alicatados, and carved plaster, yeserías, date from the 14th century, the reigns of Yusuf I and Muhammad V. After 1492 the Catholic Monarchs repaired the palace, largely with Morisco craftsmen.

To those craftsmen, Grünbaum writes, symmetry groups meant nothing. The list of 17 would be drawn up only in 1891, by the Russian crystallographer Evgraf Fedorov. On some walls, he says, one has the feeling the craftsmen broke the symmetry on purpose, so the pattern would not be monotonous.

M. C. Escher came here in October 1922 and copied a tiled panel. He returned in May 1936 with his wife, Jetta, and they filled notebooks with sketches. Later Escher copied out by hand the 1924 paper in which George Pólya illustrated all 17 kinds.

What the 17 are, and why a band can have only seven kinds of border, you can try for yourself, by stitching, at Seven borders.

Sources and method

The count uses only the examples each author published with their location: Bodner, Blanco and Harris, Pérez-Gómez and Emparán. Grünbaum and Montesinos do not name all their groups, so they appear in the table but not in the count. Disputed or rejected examples are shown but not counted.

When a source does not say whether an example depends on colour, interlace or size, the example passes that rule. Blanco and Harris write that they counted colours, but not for which examples it mattered, so the strict rules cannot exclude their examples.

The classifications of the photographs are ours. Locations come from the photos’ file pages on Wikimedia Commons.

The examples resting on Pérez-Gómez alone (the paving restored in 1965, the chair, the 10 by 5 cm detail, piece 1361) were read in his article once; the independent check could not reopen it.

Also about symmetry, on this site