mariuscomper.ukRomână

ONE COIN, THREE DATES

Why is your small change named after a Croatian viceroy?

Open DEX at ban-the-coin and you find “Et. nec.”: origin unknown. Open the medieval coin tray and you find something else: the banovac, the Croatian bans' silver denarius, with the running marten and MONETA REGIS PER SCLAVONIA. Struck at Zagreb from about 1260, it circulated — after Mihaescu 1967 — in the Romanian lands from about 1270; its name stuck to any small coin, and Vlaicu Vodă put it on his own ban in 1365.

See the three dates

Et. nec.
what DEX says about ban-the-coin
1260 · 1365 · 1867
three dates, one coin
40 → 100
parale in a leu before 1867, bani after
Slavonian denarius with the running marten and the legend around itDucat of Vladislav I Vlaicu, with the Wallachian armsA 10-bani coin of 1867, with value and year
The coin shrinks:
From the bans' silver denarius to bronze small change. The early circulation here, after Mihaescu 1967.

Starting point: the dictionaries

What the dictionaries say

Two entries, one word. One knows where it comes from; the other does not.

ban¹ n.

“A monetary unit worth a hundredth of a leu… – Et. nec.”

DEX '09 BAN1

Et. nec. = etymology unknown: the dictionary does not consider the origin established.

ban² n.

“The title borne by the dignitary the prince delegated to govern Oltenia… Governor of a border region in the Hungarian kingdom. – Cf. Hung. ban, Serb. ban.”

DEX '09 BAN2

First academic attestation

[At: N. TEST. (1648), ap. GCR I, 126/28 / Pl: ~i / E: nct]

MDA2

The 1648 New Testament attests the coin; E: nct is the same ignorance, abbreviated.

The old hypothesis, retired OUTDATED HYPOTHESIS

“Originally, the ban must have been a coin bearing the effigy of the ban who had it struck”

CADE

Dictionaries no longer buy it — with good reason: the Oltenian ban, the prince's dependent, struck no coin of his own (after Ștefănescu 1965, in Mihaescu 1967).

Romanian quotes rendered in English for this page; the originals sit one tap away.

The “ban” entries on dexonline →

The coin: Croatia, 13th century

The marten on the coin

The banovac (banski denar): the silver coin the bans and dukes struck in Slavonia from the early 13th to the mid-14th century, on the Salzburg model.

  1. Legend

    MONETA REGIS PER SCLAVONIA or MONETA DUCIS PER SCLAVONIA, around the running marten.

  2. Marten

    Croatian kuna means marten. The animal gives the coin its face and its nickname.

  3. Mint

    First at Pakrac, then at Zagreb from 1260 — hence moneta banalis and denarius Zagrabiensis.

  4. Silver

    King Béla IV's silver. Its quality drove the neighbours' coins out; the Hungarians imitated it.

The Sombor museum case of medieval silver coins
Slavonian banovci of the 13th century, in the Sombor museum case. Photo: DjordjeMarkovic, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Old drawing of a Slavonian denarius, obverse and reverse
A Slavonian denarius: the legend around the marten, in an old plate. Source: Wikimedia Commons, public domain
A pine marten on a branch
The pine marten, the animal on the coin. Photo: caroline legg, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
Old engraving of Zagreb, with the fortress on the hill
Zagreb (Agram), the mint town from 1260, in an old engraving. Source: Wikimedia Commons, public domain

Hrvatska enciklopedija, “banovac” →

The hypothesis that ties it together

The road to Wallachia

Haralambie Mihaescu gathered the pieces in 1967: ban-the-coin starts from ban-the-governor, through the bans' coins. The pre-Roman hypothesis stays inconclusive; he doubts Germanic bannum ever reached the Romanians.

“It started from the term ban “provincial governor”… in our country it meant “coin, money” in general”

Mihaescu 1967 AFTER MIHAESCU 1967

The bold step RECONSTRUCTION

After Mihaescu 1967, resting on one piece found at Curtea de Argeș (Moisil 1920), denarii banales, or simply bani, would have circulated in Romanian-inhabited lands from about 1270, and their name would have widened to any coin. Almost a century later, Vlaicu found it naturalized.

Reconstruction: one cited specimen, plus inference — and nothing named beyond it.

The Argeș piece bore the initials R L = rex Ladislaus (1272–1290).

Vlaicu, 1365

Wallachia's first own coinage: after Iliescu, in Mihaescu 1967, the prince strikes coin in 1365 — and by the first half of the 15th century he has two denominations: ducat and ban. The “coin” sense looks like a Romanian innovation, born north of the Danube; Romanian texts show it from the 16th century.

The customs take bani

  • 1413, Bran

    “trei bani, pedestrul un ban — three bani, a pedestrian one ban”

  • 1422

    “calul slobod trei bani, pedestrul un ban — a free horse three bani, a pedestrian one ban”

  • 1424

    “un cal neîmpovărat un ban… trei bani — an unladen horse one ban… three bani”

No specimen of that early ban has reached us. The gap stays on the table, in sight.

The stone walls of the princely court at Curtea de Argeș
The princely court at Argeș, where the R L piece was found. Photo: Leontin l, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Old drawing of Vlaicu's ducat, obverse and reverse
A ducat of Vladislav I Vlaicu, in an old plate: the Wallachian shield and eagle. Source: Wikimedia Commons, public domain
A plate of six Wallachian ducats
Wallachian ducats: the large denomination of the 14th century. Photo: Wikiacc1985, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Bran castle, seen through the trees
Bran, whose customs took bani as early as 1413. Photo: Sîmbotin, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0 RO

Mihaescu 1967 (PDF) →

Three stops

Three dates

The whole road on one rail: the mint, the reign, the law.

  1. The mint at Zagreb

    1260

    Pakrac → Zagreb: the banovac begins as moneta banalis, a silver marten denarius.

    stop 1 of 3

  2. Vlaicu's ban

    1365

    Wallachia's first own coinage: ducat + ban, with a word already naturalized.

    stop 2 of 3

  3. The law

    1867

    1 leu = 100 bani: 5 g silver 835‰ or 0.3226 g gold 900‰. The 40-parale division is replaced, after BNR.

    stop 3 of 3

Voted 29 Mar/10 Apr, Senate 14/26 Apr, Monitorul no. 89, 22 Apr/4 May 1867 (old/new style).

The word's road

  1. Ban

    the title: the governor

  2. banovac

    the bans' coin, from 1260

  3. ban

    the small change, from 1365 to this day

The other small coin

Para: the Persian piece

The word comes from Persian pâre, “piece”.

  • The Ottoman para: 3 akçe from 1640; the 1688 kuruş is worth 40 para.

  • The fictitious leu of the Organic Regulation divides into 40 parale (1831–1832), after BNR. AFTER BNR

  • The 1867 law divides it into 100 bani and buries para as a unit of account, after BNR. AFTER BNR

The word outlives the coin: parale, “nici două parale”; MDA2 lists para among the ban's synonyms.

An Ottoman 40-para coin, obverse and reverse
An Ottoman 40-para piece: how many made a 1688 kuruş. Source: Wikimedia Commons, public domain
Reverse of an Ottoman 10-para coin
10 copper para, Abdülaziz: the Empire's late small change. Photo: Raimond Spekking, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
A Romanian 10-bani coin of 1867, obverse and reverse
10 bani 1867: the law's new small change. Photo: scan by Bogdan Giușcă; coin by National Bank of Romania, Wikimedia Commons, public domain

Para (currency) →

The lion on one card

The leu takes its name from the Dutch lion thaler (leeuwendaalder), arrived around 1600 and a unit of account by 1831/1832. The whole story — the romanat, the deaths of 1947, 1952 and 2005 — lives at leul-1867.

The leu's story, start to finish →

A Dutch silver thaler with the lion, obverse and reverse
A Dutch lion thaler: the coin the leu is named after. Photo: CNG, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.5

The title's origin

An honest dispute

Where does ban-the-governor come from? Four named answers — and no winner. This page's verdict: disputed. DISPUTED

The rich man

bajan “rich”: a Mongol word, probably Avar, into Romanian through Hung. bán — Cioranescu, after Berneker.

The warden

bân “lord, guard” and marz-bân “border warden” — Sakač, Rački.

The Croat

Of Croatian origin — Miklosich.

The Hun

A Hunnic guess, noted by Kinnamos in 1180–1183: a 12th-century supposition.

The Avar derivation is judged unconvincing: the title never appears among the Avars (Ančić).

Earliest attestation: βο(ε)άνος in Constantine Porphyrogenitus, around 950. The Severin banate: 1233–1526.

The research, in brief, at “Ban (title)” →

Test yourself

Who came first?

Six dates from this page, shuffled. Put them in order, oldest first.

Move each card to its place, 1 to 6. Keys 1–6 move the chosen card; cards also drag by finger.

  1. 1648

    The New Testament: first academic attestation

    Place
  2. 1260

    The mint moves to Zagreb

    Place
  3. 1867

    The law: 1 leu = 100 bani

    Place
  4. 1413

    Bran customs take “trei bani”

    Place
  5. 1688

    The kuruş is worth 40 para

    Place
  6. 1365

    Vlaicu strikes his own coin

    Place

Score: 0 of 6

The right order, oldest first:

  1. 1260 — The mint moves to Zagreb
  2. 1365 — Vlaicu strikes his own coin
  3. 1413 — Bran customs take “trei bani”
  4. 1648 — The New Testament: first academic attestation
  5. 1688 — The kuruş is worth 40 para
  6. 1867 — The law: 1 leu = 100 bani

The settled row: every date in its place.

Sources

Dictionaries first, then the 1967 thesis and the Croatian coin, then the neighbours. Every risky claim points at its source.

Dictionaries

Thesis and coin

Neighbours

Type: Fraunces and Source Serif 4, under the SIL Open Font Licence.