mariuscomper.ukRomână

DUŠ · MAN · DUȘMAN

Why do we call the enemy the ill-minded one?

Romanian dușman came through Turkish from Persian. But the story runs much deeper: its older Iranian ancestor is analysed through elements meaning “bad” or “hostile” plus “thought” or “mind” — roughly, “ill-thinking”, “hostile-minded”. Romanian gând, though, has nothing to do with it: it comes from Hungarian gond. “Ill thought” translates the old sense, not the matter of the Romanian word.

Take the word apart

One borrowing
from Persian through Turkish
One deep history
“ill thought” in Old Iranian
YEAR UNSPECIFIED
MDA2: NECULCE, L. 313 — no year in the entry
A Shahnameh miniature: the Persian world where dušman sets outMohács, 1526, an Ottoman miniature: the Turkish world carrying the word our wayVarlaam's Cazania, 1643: Romanian in print, where the word comes home
Three pictures, one enemy:
Persia, the Porte, the Romanian press: three ways of seeing one word.

The page's machine

The autopsy, morpheme by morpheme

Each piece names its language and the dictionary that gives it. The RO/TR/FA/AV tags name the language; ATTESTED says the form truly occurs in texts.

dușman today's Romanian RO

From tc. düșman — the DEX '09 seal, same as in '98. Plural dușmani, stress dușmán (regional dúșman). (DEX)

düşman Turkish TR

TDK: Farsça duşmān — Turkish itself points at Persian, and stops there. Sense 1: the one who wishes you ill, bears you a grudge.

دشمن dušman Persian FA

Steingass 1892: “An enemy, foe, adversary” — with the dušmān variant. The borrowing ends here; the deep history begins.

duš- the ill FA

Steingass, p. 526: “Evil, bad, ugly (in such words as dushman, dushnām)” — the “ill” bit of the word, with its example quoted inside the dictionary.

manah- thought AV ATTESTED

Nişanyan: Avestan manah- “düşünce, akıl, ruh” — thought, mind, soul. The second bit of the deep compound, not modern Persian man.

duš-nām the ill name FA

Steingass, p. 527: “Ill name, abuse, reproach” — the same historical element, another target: the “ill name”.

duš-manah- Avestan AV ATTESTED

Nişanyan: Avestan dušmanah- “kötü düşünen”, the ill-thinking one, from duš “ill” and manah- “thought, mind”; Bartholomae (1904) lists it as an attested Avestan adjective, “whose thinking is ill or hostile”, with Persian dušman as its correspondent. The deepest root — and a kinship, not a borrowing.

“The ill-minded one” translates the Old Iranian structure. The Romanian word gând takes no part in the etymology: it comes from Hungarian gond.

The map

Two kinds of arrows

“How it reached us” and “what its ancestor was made of” are two different questions. This page keeps them on separate tracks — with arrows you cannot mistake for each other.

BORROWING THE BORROWING ROUTE

How the word reached us

  1. دشمن dušman, dušmān FA

    Persian — Steingass 1892: “An enemy, foe, adversary”

  2. düşman TR

    Turkish — TDK: “Farsça duşmān” — Turkish points at Persian

  3. dușman RO

    Romanian — DEX '09: “Din tc. düșman”

Two borrowings, three dictionaries. On this track, every step is one language taking the word from another.

KIN THE DEEP HISTORY

What its ancestor was made of

  1. duš- · manah- AV

    the pieces — “bad, hostile” and “thought, mind” (Nişanyan; Bartholomae)

  2. duš-manah- AV

    the compound — an attested Avestan adjective: “whose thinking is ill” (Bartholomae 1904)

  3. dušman, dušmān FA

    the heir — Persian inherits it through the Iranian layers (Nişanyan; Steingass)

No link on this track is a borrowing. Persian did not take the word from Avestan; it inherits it from the same family.

Legend

  • BORROWING — the word passes from one language into another

  • KIN — forms of the same family — inheritance, not borrowing

  • ATTESTED

    the form occurs in texts or dictionaries — every form on the tracks is attested

  • RECONSTRUCTED

    a form linguists deduce, marked with a star — none appears on the tracks above

How it went native

At home with us

Borrowed into Romanian through Turkish, the word then behaved perfectly Romanian: stress, plural, feminine, derivatives.

Stress: dușmán or dúșman

The standard is dușmán; Moldavia also says dúșman — DEX lists the regional variant, DLRLC pins it on Moldavia. Two stresses, no war. (DEX)

Plural: dușmani

DOOM 3 (2021): dușmán, pl. dușmáni; feminine dușmánă, pl. dușmáne. Nothing spectacular — which is exactly the proof of nativization. (DEX)

Derivatives: a whole family

DER lines them up: dușmancă, dușmănesc, dușmănește, dușmănos, dușmăni, dușmănie, îndușmăni — from adjective to verb and back. (DER)

Neculce, no year in the entry

MDA2 gives the attestation as “NECULCE, L. 313”, with no year in the entry: a yearless reference, not a dated first attestation. (MDA2)

1469 is a name, not a word

DON (Constantinescu, 1963) records the name DUȘMAN in 1469, 1542 and 1604 — people's names in documents, not the common noun. The only secure calendar dates are the name's, not the word's.

Title page of Elemente turcești
Șăineanu, Elemente turcești: the Romanian Turkisms, inventoried. Photo: Tipografia Academiei Române (Laboratorii Români), Wikimedia Commons, public domain

DEX '09: dușman ← tc. düșman →

The same compound, other skies

Cousins: Bulgarian, Serbian — and the mirrors

It travelled through several Balkan languages on the Turkish route; Latin and Greek had built their “enemy” differently.

Bulgarian: душман and душманин

From Persian through Turkish (RBE: “От перс. през тур. dûşman”); today's Bulgarian keeps it as obsolete, now vernacular or popular speech (RBE: “Остар., сега простонар”): душман, with the душманин variant, “enemy, foe”.

Serbo-Croatian: dušmanin

HJP: “tur. düşman ← perz. dušmen” — the same borrowing, sealed at Zagreb: “ljuti neprijatelj”, the bitter enemy. No separate Serbian academy entry found online.

Latin: in-amicus, the un-friend

Lewis & Short: in-amicus, “unfriendly, hostile” — literally “un-friend”: Latin negated its friend to make its enemy.

Greek: echthros, hatred

LSJ: ἐχθρός, “enemy” — the lexical family ties the enemy to hatred (ἔχθος): affect, not thought. Three logics: negation, affect, a mind turned wrong.

Suleiman receiving Barbarossa, a 1558 miniature
The Ottoman divan, Süleymanname 1558: the court through which Persian flowed to the Balkans. Photo: Suleymanname, 1558, Wikimedia Commons, public domain

HJP: dušman ← tur. ← perz. →

Where we stand

What holds and what stays open

Three things hold; three stay open. Each names its source and its kind of link. DISPUTED

What holds

The borrowing holds

Dușman from Turkish düşman, Turkish from Persian dušman — with DEX, TDK and Steingass witnessing in turn.

The deep history holds

The Iranian ancestor splits into duš- “bad, hostile” and manah- “thought, mind”: Avestan duš-manah-, “whose thinking is ill” — attested (Bartholomae 1904), analysed the same way by Nişanyan.

The cousins hold

Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian took the same word by the same route: RBE — “От перс. през тур. dûşman”; HJP — “tur. düşman ← perz. dušmen”.

What stays open

The dictionary Kipchak?

Wiktionary proposes a Kipchak first route, then Ottoman reinforcement — but the entry offers no specialist source for this precision here; the verified Romanian dictionaries indicate only a Turkish origin. This page leaves the sub-route open.

When does the noun enter?

MDA2 points at “NECULCE, L. 313”, with no year in the entry; 1469 is a person's name (DON 1963), not a common noun. The clean year of entry is missing — the hole stays visible.

Scriban and the Greek?

Scriban (1939) derived Persian from Greek dys-menés. The resemblance is real — LSJ breaks dus-menēs into dus- and menos — but the arrow runs backwards: the Greek word is a distant cousin, not the source. An outdated hypothesis, kept in the stamp.

No disputed link gets a single truth: mechanisms stand with their source beside them, and the alternatives stay on the table.

What is NOT disputed: the Romanian–Turkish–Persian borrowing and the Iranian duš- and manah- analysis — two different levels, both documented.

DER: Tc. (per.) düșmen →

Test yourself

Two roads

Four forms, three links — but not all links are alike. Choose the kind of each link: borrowing or kinship.

Tick one link-kind per gap, then check: every gap shows its source. To retry with the sources hidden, start over.

  1. dușman today's Romanian RO
  2. düşman Turkish TR
  3. دشمن dušman Persian FA
  4. dušmanah- Avestan AV
Link 1: dușman — düşman

Borrowing — DEX '09: “Din tc. düșman”. Romanian took the word from Turkish.

Link 2: düşman — dušman

Borrowing — TDK: “Farsça duşmān”. Turkish took it from Persian.

Link 3: dušman — dušmanah-

Kinship — Nişanyan: Avestan dušmanah- is of the same origin (“kötü düşünen”, the ill-thinking one); Bartholomae lists it as attested, with Persian dušman as its correspondent.

Score: 0 of 3

The same arrows would mislead. Romanian borrowed the word from Turkish; Persian did not borrow it from Avestan in the same way — it inherits it from Old Iranian.

The links, in brief

The same arrows would mislead. Romanian borrowed the word from Turkish; Persian did not borrow it from Avestan in the same way — it inherits it from Old Iranian.

  1. Link 1: dușman — düşman — Borrowing — DEX '09: “Din tc. düșman”. Romanian took the word from Turkish.
  2. Link 2: düşman — dušman — Borrowing — TDK: “Farsça duşmān”. Turkish took it from Persian.
  3. Link 3: dušman — dušmanah- — Kinship — Nişanyan: Avestan dušmanah- is of the same origin (“kötü düşünen”, the ill-thinking one); Bartholomae lists it as attested, with Persian dušman as its correspondent.

Two borrowings and a kinship: Romanian from Turkish, Turkish from Persian, Persian from the Iranian family.