Berlin · Spree Island

BERLIN · FIVE DOCUMENTED STATES

One Berlin plot, three buildings: reconstructed palace façades around a new museum

A Prussian palace was demolished, an East German palace was built and later demolished, and Baroque façades returned around a new museum. Five documented moments follow the different buildings that occupied one Berlin site.

Berlin, Germany: a royal residence, Palast der Republik (“Palace of the Republic”) and the Humboldt Forum occupied this site in turn; their footprints did not coincide.

Share
↗

A flat plan of the site and its surroundings

This plan shows central Berlin today. The violet marker locates Schlossplatz; it is not the footprint of a historic building. The Spree, Lustgarten, Berlin Cathedral and Unter den Linden stay in view in every state.

State shown:16 December 2020 / 20 July 2021

A flat plan of the site and its surroundingsThis plan shows central Berlin today. The violet marker locates Schlossplatz; it is not the footprint of a historic building. The Spree, Lustgarten, Berlin Cathedral and Unter den Linden stay in view in every state.SpreeLustgartenBerlin CathedralUnter den LindenSchlossplatz · site locator
Context plan; historic building outlines are omitted.
OSM extract: 2026-10-04
The Humboldt Forum seen from Schlossplatz on the day before its public opening, 19 July 2021.

Photograph dated 19 July 2021, one day before the public opening.

Geoprofi Lars · Own work · CC BY-SA 4.0 · 2021-07-19 Humboldt Forum Berlin 01.jpg

One site, with distinct buildings. Reconstructed Baroque façades frame a new museum designed by Franco Stella; the Spree-facing side is modern.

Context map: © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL 1.0 · ODbL 1.0

State shown

The Humboldt Forum opens in two stages

In 2002 the Bundestag approved a museum use plan and reconstructed Baroque façades; the competition jury selected Franco Stella’s design in 2008. The Forum opened digitally on 16 December 2020, then to the public on 20 July 2021. [V05] [V05.1] [V06] [V06.1] [V06.2]

“Came back” describes reconstructed Baroque façades around a new museum. The interior is new, and the Spree-facing side follows Stella’s modern design. In 2018, the first exhibits were moved into the building.

What the evidence showsPhotograph dated the day before the public opening; the two opening events have separate dates.

Context plan; historic building outlines are omitted. Context map: © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL 1.0. All five states, their chronology and image provenance are also available in the table and gallery below.

All five states, their chronology and image provenance are also available in the table and gallery below.
State shownPlanChoose a dated stateWhat the evidence shows
c. 1900Royal residence around 1900In 1701, King Frederick I of Prussia commissioned Andreas Schlüter and later Eosander to turn his residence into a representative Baroque palace; Berlin’s planning account describes the palace as anchoring the westward Unter den Linden axis. [V01.1] [V01.4] [V04.2] [V08]Dated photograph; see its file record and credit.
7 September–December 1950The palace is demolishedBerlin.de attributes the 7 September blast to Walter Ulbricht’s order and records mass protests; the Stiftung Humboldt Forum dates demolition from September through December and also places it at Ulbricht’s initiative. These sources do not reproduce the authorities’ exact justification. [V01.1] [V01.2]Photograph dated during demolition; it does not show the explosion.
23 April 1976Palast der Republik opensThe SED Politburo approved the project in March 1973; it opened on 23 April 1976 after 32 months of construction (Bundesarchiv). [V02.4] [V07]Dated construction, opening and later photographs; their dates differ from the state represented.
early 2006–December 2008 / Senate measure through 2009Palast der Republik is dismantledThe Bundestag decided on demolition in 2003, after its 2002 vote for reconstructed Baroque façades; the Stiftung Humboldt Forum places that decision in the plan to reshape the historic centre. The Berliner reports that asbestos removal had ended by 2003 and that dismantling continued. [V02.1] [V02.3] [V04] [V04.1] [V04.2] [V05]Photographs dated June 2007 and October 2008; records give different end scopes.
16 December 2020 / 20 July 2021The Humboldt Forum opens in two stagesIn 2002 the Bundestag approved a museum use plan and reconstructed Baroque façades; the competition jury selected Franco Stella’s design in 2008. The Forum opened digitally on 16 December 2020, then to the public on 20 July 2021. [V05] [V05.1] [V06] [V06.1] [V06.2]Photograph dated the day before the public opening; the two opening events have separate dates.
↗

What the records say about the demolitions

Dates and reasons stay attached to the institution or publication that reported them.

1950 · an order and protests

Berlin.de says Walter Ulbricht ordered the 7 September blast “despite massive protests from the population”. The Stiftung Humboldt Forum attributes the demolition to Ulbricht’s initiative and dates it from September through December. The sources checked here do not reproduce an exact official justification. [V01.2] [V01.1]

1990–2006 · asbestos removal, then demolition

The Stiftung Humboldt Forum links the 1990 closure to asbestos contamination and records the 2003 parliamentary decision to demolish. The Berliner reports that asbestos removal was complete by 2003 and that the carcinogen was no longer there. Both accounts remain attributed; this page does not select one motive. [V01.1] [V02.3]

December 2008 or March 2009?

The Stiftung Humboldt Forum, GHDI and Berlin.de place the building’s dismantling by December 2008. A Berlin Senate table dated 11 March 2009 lists “Demolition of the Palace of the Republic (incl. asbestos remediation)” as a measure ending in 2009. A Berlin planning document gives January 2009 in one section and 2006–March 2009 in another. The records use different scopes and date references, so we keep them side by side. [V01.1] [V01.2] [V02.1] [V04] [V04.1] [V04.2]

↗

Reconstructed façades, a new building

The Bundestag’s recorded vote on 4 July 2002: 380 votes for reconstructing the Baroque façades, 133 for an open competition, 62 against both alternatives, six abstentions and eight invalid ballots. The protocol says the first option had to exceed the other option plus the votes against; it won the required majority in the first round. In 2008, the jury unanimously selected architect Franco Stella. Reconstructed façades now frame a new museum; the building structure and interiors are modern. [V05] [V05.1] [V06]

↗

Bucharest: a palace kept

In Bucharest, Romania’s capital, the Palace of Parliament remained the seat of Parliament; the Chamber of Deputies decided to move there in 1993, after the Uranus district was demolished and the building was constructed. In Berlin after reunification, Palast der Republik was demolished and Baroque façades were rebuilt around a new museum. The comparison is limited to the later choice: whether to retain or remove a political building. [V09]

Read the Bucharest Palace of Parliament story
↗

Sources and credits

Each photograph’s date comes from its Commons file record; the file page and licence are linked beside the image. The drawing and the photographs have separate rights routes.

  1. Stiftung Humboldt Forum, Architectural BackgrounderSite chronology, the 1950 demolition, partial overlaps and reconstructed façades. · V01.1
  2. Berlin.de, StadtschlossThe 7 September 1950 blast date and the protests recorded by the city portal. · V01.2
  3. Berlin Senate, planning justification for the historic centreDescribes the Stadtschloss as an anchor of the Unter den Linden axis and the historic-centre planning context. · V01.4
  4. German History in Documents and Images, Palace Square before and afterThe 1976 opening, 1990 closure and demolition chronology through December 2008. · V02.1
  5. Bundesarchiv, Palast unter Stasi-SchutzSED Politburo approval, Honecker’s speech and demolition through the end of 2008. · V02.4
  6. The Berliner, The tumultuous story of the Palast der RepublikAttributed reporting on asbestos removal through 2003 and the dispute over the demolition rationale. · V02.3
  7. ENR, Senate-relayed spring-2009 end (attributed relay)Attributed relay: works ended spring 2009 “according to the Senate”; the 700-tonne figure stays off the page. · V04
  8. Berlin Senate, 2009 measure table11 March 2009 Senate table: “Demolition of the Palace of the Republic (incl. asbestos remediation)”, a measure ending in 2009. · V04.1
  9. Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin, planning dossier 17/0183The planning dossier records January 2009 on p. 13 and 2006–March 2009 on p. 75. · V04.2
  10. Deutscher Bundestag, 14th legislative period, plenary protocol 14/248Recorded vote of 4 July 2002: 380 for façades, 133 for an open competition, 62 against, six abstentions and eight invalid ballots. · V05
  11. Deutscher Bundestag, 4 July 2002 retrospectiveExplains the vote’s alternatives and the Forum plan as a place for dialogue between cultures and science. · V05.1
  12. Stiftung Humboldt Forum, opening dates and 2018 milestoneThe first exhibits moved into the building in 2018; digital opening was 16 December 2020 and public opening was 20 July 2021. · V06
  13. Stiftung Humboldt Forum, digital opening releaseDigital opening date: 16 December 2020. · V06.1
  14. Stiftung Humboldt Forum, public opening releasePublic opening date: 20 July 2021. · V06.2
  15. Architekturmuseum der TU Berlin, Inv. 14567 and image-ordering termsErnst Ludwig Reinhold Persius drawing, east view, c. 1880–90; free 3000-pixel JPG through the PD route. · V08
  16. Wikimedia Commons, twelve independently rechecked file recordsEach photograph’s licence, author, date and dimensions are linked in the local gallery and build manifest. · V07
  17. OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL 1.0Extract limited to a recorded area; current geography is simplified for the flat plan. · OSM
  18. Palatul Parlamentului project, Bucharest mirror evidenceA bridge to the Palatul Parlamentului documentation; its numbers are not repeated here. · V09

What the plan can show

This flat plan shows current geography. Historic building outlines are left off: the sources describe partial relationships between the sites but do not provide comparable footprints for each period. [V01.1] [V04] [OSM]

Context map: © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL 1.0 · ODbL 1.0. OpenStreetMap extract: 2026-10-04T23:50:49Z; frame south, west, north, east: 52.5125, 13.384, 52.5235, 13.416; SHA-256 0211bc654f6d4d8de3dca462742fcc1b48e63ea4cd43a6b9f47cfd12ffbbb9e5.