#How high is the Danube, and how much water does it carry, town by town?
Height and flow, one above the other, town by town. By Vienna the river has made 76% of its descent but carries only 29% of the water it brings to the sea.
| Place | Danube km | Height above sea, m | Share of the fall made | Mean flow, m³/s (model) | Mean flow, m³/s (gauge) | Share of the water at the mouth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonaueschingenGermany | 2,779 | 678 | 0% | 6 | — | 0% |
| UlmGermany | 2,587 | 467 | 31% | 130 | — | 2% |
| IngolstadtGermany | 2,458 | 363 | 46% | 320 | — | 5% |
| RegensburgGermany | 2,379 | 327 | 52% | 430 | — | 6% |
| PassauGermany | 2,225 | 290 | 57% | 1,360 | 1,470 | 20% |
| LinzAustria | 2,135 | 250 | 63% | 1,430 | — | 21% |
| ViennaAustria | 1,929 | 161 | 76% | 1,940 | 1,920 | 29% |
| BratislavaSlovakia | 1,865 | 130 | 81% | 2,090 | — | 31% |
| BudapestHungary | 1,647 | 98 | 86% | 2,310 | 2,350 | 34% |
| MohácsHungary | 1,448 | 82 | 88% | 2,270 | — | 34% |
| VukovarCroatia | 1,335 | 74 | 89% | 2,790 | — | 41% |
| Novi SadSerbia | 1,254 | 74 | 89% | 2,790 | — | 41% |
| BelgradeSerbia | 1,170 | 68 | 90% | 3,710 | — | 55% |
| BaziașRomania | 1,073 | 67 | 90% | 5,480 | 5,523 | 81% |
| Drobeta-Turnu SeverinRomania | 931 | 39 | 94% | 5,510 | — | 82% |
| VidinBulgaria | 793 | 25 | 96% | 5,550 | — | 82% |
| LomBulgaria | 742 | 24 | 96% | 5,520 | — | 82% |
| SvishtovBulgaria | 554 | 15 | 98% | 5,780 | — | 86% |
| RuseBulgaria | 496 | 14 | 98% | 5,820 | — | 86% |
| GiurgiuRomania | 493 | 14 | 98% | 5,820 | — | 86% |
| SilistraBulgaria | 380 | 4 | 99% | 5,950 | — | 88% |
| BrăilaRomania | 170 | 1 | 100% | 6,230 | — | 92% |
| GalațiRomania | 150 | 1 | 100% | 6,530 | — | 97% |
Heights are rounded to the metre and are a satellite snapshot of the water surface, not a long-term mean level, except around Vienna, where they are official mean water levels. Gauge flows are long-term averages reported by Gâștescu (2023). The model's flow at the mouth is 6,740 m³/s; the measured average at Ceatal Chilia is 6,452.
#How was this measured?
The terrain is the Copernicus digital elevation model at 90-metre resolution, made from radar images taken by the TanDEM-X satellites, averaged here to cells of about 1.7 km.
The rivers come from HydroRIVERS, a global river network derived from satellite elevation data. Its 42,994 stretches in the Danube basin each carry a long-term mean flow from the WaterGAP hydrological model; the map shows the 14,248 with at least 1 m³/s. Checked against gauges, the model is close: about 1,940 m³/s at Vienna against a measured 1,920, about 2,310 at Budapest against 2,350, about 5,480 at Baziaș against 5,523. At the mouth it runs about 4% high.
The river's height is the lowest point of the elevation model within about 700 metres of the river line, smoothed so the river never flows uphill. Satellite elevation models flatten water surfaces, so these heights are a snapshot of the river's level when the images were taken. Bulgarian river agency gauges check them: their zero marks sit at 26.75 m at Novo Selo, 22.65 m at Lom, 14.89 m at Svishtov and 11.80 m at Ruse, and the satellite surface lies 0.1 to 2.2 m above each. In Vienna, though, the satellite reads the water up to eight metres too low (153 m at the Reichsbrücke, where the official mean water level is 161.42 m), so between Korneuburg and the Freudenau dam the profile uses the mean water levels published by via donau, Austria's waterway agency.
The power is gross hydraulic power: the density of water times gravity times the mean flow times the drop, summed segment by segment. It is the rate at which the falling river releases energy, before any turbine, and it is computed from mean flows, so floods and droughts average out.
The raindrop follows HydroRIVERS from the nearest mapped river stretch downstream to the sea. Its distances are measured along the mapped network, which runs 7 to 12% longer than the official river kilometres. The height of the starting point is the average ground in a cell of about 1.7 km, so on a mountain it reads lower than the summit. The countries come from Natural Earth's borders; Moldova's short stretch of Danube bank at Giurgiulești, too short for those cells, is added for every path that passes it. The river names come from Natural Earth's river lines, matched where they lie within three kilometres of a mapped river; two wrongly matched names were corrected (the Mur on the lower Drava, the Someșul Cald on the Someșul Mic and the Someș), and names that cover less than eight kilometres of a path are left out.
Two figures rest on weaker evidence. The kilometre of Donaueschingen, about 2,779, is inferred from the official German stationing; the Danube Commission gives the river's length from there as 2,845 km, so the shares of length here could be a point or two lower. The 27-metre head of the Iron Gates I dam comes from a Romanian press interview, and the Serbian side's 1,140 MW from a press report quoting the operator.
#Sources
- Gâștescu, P. (2023). The Danube and its delta: hydrogeographic characteristics. Water Resources and Wetlands conference. www.limnology.ro. Donaueschingen at 678 m; mean flows at Passau, Vienna, Budapest, Baziaș and Ceatal Chilia (1931–2020); Drava, Tisza and Sava; slope of the lower Danube.
- ICPDR, The Danube River Basin (mirrored by IW:LEARN). archive.iwlearn.net. Basin area of 801,463 km²; 19 countries; the world's most international river basin.
- via donau (2019). Manual on Danube Navigation. www.viadonau.org. River kilometres of ports and locks; length from Donaueschingen.
- via donau / Austrian Ministry for Climate Action (2024). Streckenatlas der österreichischen Donau. www.doris.bmk.gv.at. Kilometres of Linz and Vienna; free-flowing stretches of the Wachau and east of Vienna.
- via donau (2023). Kennzeichnende Wasserstände der österreichischen Donau, KWD 2020. www.viadonau.org. Mean water levels from Korneuburg to the Freudenau dam, used for the profile in Vienna (161.42 m at the Reichsbrücke).
- Bavarian Water Agency, Gewässerkundlicher Dienst: Hofkirchen and Passau-Ingling gauges, main values. www.gkd.bayern.de. Mean flow of the Inn (736 m³/s, 1921–2023) and of the Danube at Hofkirchen (633 m³/s, 1901–2025).
- LGRB Baden-Württemberg (Selg, 2010). Donauversickerung. lgrbwissen.lgrb-bw.de. Days without flow at the Danube sinks; distance and height to the Aachtopf; the 5 m³/s carried underground.
- Käss, W. (1969). Schrifttum zur Versickerung der oberen Donau zwischen Immendingen und Fridingen. Steirische Beiträge zur Hydrogeologie 1969, 215–246. opac.geologie.ac.at. Knop's 1877 fluorescein test; the Aach drains to Lake Constance and the Rhine.
- Verbund: power plant pages, Jochenstein to Freudenau. power.verbund.com. Ten Austrian Danube power plants and their capacities.
- Elektroprivreda Srbije: hydropower plants. www.eps.rs. Iron Gates I in operation from 16 May 1972; six units on each side; Iron Gates II from 1985.
- Bulgarian Executive Agency for Exploration and Maintenance of the Danube: gauge yearbooks for Novo Selo, Lom, Svishtov and Ruse. www.appd-bg.org. Gauge zero heights used to check the satellite water surface.
- Lehner, B. and Grill, G. (2013). Global river hydrography and network routing. Hydrological Processes 27; HydroRIVERS technical documentation v1.0. data.hydrosheds.org. River network and long-term mean flows (WaterGAP 2.2, 1971–2000).
- Copernicus DEM Product Handbook, version 5.0. dataspace.copernicus.eu. Terrain; radar images from December 2010 to January 2015; flattened water bodies.
- Natural Earth, 1:10m cultural and physical vectors. www.naturalearthdata.com. Country borders, lakes and river names.